Literature DB >> 21400127

Vessel sealing system uvulopalatoplasty versus uvulopalatal flap: a randomized, controlled study of efficacy and adverse effects.

Prakobkiat Hirunwiwatkul1, Jesada Kanjanaumporn.   

Abstract

The objective of this randomized, controlled study is to compare intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative pain and postoperative adverse effects (bleeding, velopharyngeal insufficiency and others) between vessel sealing system uvulopalatoplasty (VSSU) and uvulopalatal flap (UPF). The study was conducted at the Department of Otolaryngology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. 31 subjects with sleep-disordered breathing and obstruction at the retropalatal level were enrolled consecutively. Intervention was randomized by mixed block randomization into 2 groups (UPF, VSSU). Stratification was also done by the presence or absence of concomitant tonsillectomy. Measured outcomes, which were blinded to patients and outcome assessor, were intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative pain, postoperative bleeding, postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency and other adverse effects. Median (IQR) of intraoperative blood loss from VSSU and UPF was 0.00 (0.00-1.00) and 6.00 (1.25-12.75) ml (p < 0.001). Median (IQR) of operative time from VSSU and UPF was 3.50 (3.00-5.00) and 15.00 (12.25-18.00) min (p < 0.001). There was significantly less pain in VSSU group on operative day (p = 0.001) and postoperative day 1 (p = 0.009). However, no significant difference of pain on postoperative day 2 to day 14 (p = 0.055-0.983) between both groups. Regarding postoperative bleeding, 1 case of immediate bleeding in UPF group and 1 case of delayed bleeding in VSSU group were found in this study. Postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency and other adverse effects were not found in both groups. In conclusion, VSSU was better than UPF in terms of less intraoperative blood loss, less operative time and less pain in early postoperative period. Postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency and other adverse effects were not found in both groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21400127     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1553-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  15 in total

1.  The use of the Ligasure Vessel Sealing System in parotid gland surgery.

Authors:  Emmanuel P Prokopakis; Vassilios A Lachanas; Emmanuel S Helidonis; George A Velegrakis
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 2.  Laparoscopic splenectomy: present status and future perspective.

Authors:  Charles F Bellows; John F Sweeney
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.166

3.  LigaSure device in parotid gland surgery.

Authors:  Giuseppe Colella; Amerigo Giudice
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Tonsillectomy using the Ligasure vessel sealing system. A preliminary report.

Authors:  Emmanuel P Prokopakis; Vassilios A Lachanas; Antonios A Benakis; Emmanuel S Helidonis; George A Velegrakis
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 5.  Principles and initial experience of a new device for dissection and hemostasis.

Authors:  A S Gözen; D Teber; J J Rassweiler
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.442

6.  Ligasure versus cold knife tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Vassilios A Lachanas; Emmanuel P Prokopakis; Constantinos A Bourolias; Alexander D Karatzanis; Stylianos G Malandrakis; Emmanuel S Helidonis; George A Velegrakis
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Postoperative tonsillectomy pain in pediatric patients: electrocautery (hot) vs cold dissection and snare tonsillectomy--a randomized trial.

Authors:  D A Nunez; J Provan; M Crawford
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-07

8.  Pediatric total tonsillectomy using coblation compared to conventional electrosurgery: a prospective, controlled single-blind study.

Authors:  Kelly E Stoker; Debra M Don; D Richard Kang; Michael S Haupert; Anthony Magit; David N Madgy
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Radiofrequency tonsil reduction: safety, morbidity, and efficacy.

Authors:  Michael Friedman; Phillip LoSavio; Hani Ibrahim; Vidyasagar Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Recovery after tonsillectomy: electrodissection vs. sharp dissection techniques.

Authors:  D B Wexler
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.591

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of early postoperative pain among surgical techniques for obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Timur Akcam; Hasan Huseyin Arslan; Suleyman Deniz; Hakan Genc; Omer Karakoc; Serkan Senkal; Mustafa Gerek
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of LigaSure small jaw vessel sealing system versus conventional technique in thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Prakobkiat Hirunwiwatkul; Sutumma Tungkavivachagul
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.