Literature DB >> 8643267

Recovery after tonsillectomy: electrodissection vs. sharp dissection techniques.

D B Wexler1.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that electrodissection tonsillectomy is associated with increased pain and delayed healing in comparison with sharp techniques for tonsillectomy. To better define the clinical significance of this difference, a detailed study of the time course of recovery was undertaken in adults and children after tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy by the sharp or electrodissection method. For electrodissection tonsillectomy, electrocautery set to 20 W was used for dissection and hemostasis, and after sharp dissection the suction electrocautery was used only selectively at bleeding sites. Daily pain scores were recorded for 2 weeks, and return to normal diet and activities was monitored. In adults the electrodissection tonsillectomy (n = 26) resulted in an average delay of 2 days in recovery from pain (p < 0.05) and a 2-day delay in return to a normal diet (p < 0.05) compared with sharp tonsillectomy (n = 24). In children (aged 2 to 12 years) the electrodissection technique (n = 26) resulted in an average delay trend of 1 to 1.5 days (not significant) compared with the sharp method (n = 24). Electrodissection tonsillectomy results in an average delay in recovery of 2 days for adults and in a lesser delay in pediatric patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8643267     DOI: 10.1016/S0194-59989670249-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   5.591


  9 in total

1.  Postoperative Pain in Adult Tonsillectomy: Is There Any Difference Between the Technique?

Authors:  Itziar Álvarez Palacios; Ricardo González-Orús Álvarez-Morujo; Cristina Alonso Martínez; Alejandra Ayala Mejías; Oscar Arenas Brítez
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-01-16

2.  Is the systemic inflammatory reaction to surgery responsible for post-operative pain after tonsillectomy, and is it "technique-related"?

Authors:  Zeljka Roje; Goran Racic; Goran Kardum; Mirnes Selimovic
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 3.  Dissection versus diathermy for tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Darren K Pinder; Helena Wilson; Malcolm P Hilton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-03-16

4.  Role of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Complications of Tonsillectomy in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Ziya Salturk; Tolgar Lutfi Kumral; Ahmet Arslanoglu; Imran Aydogdu; Guven Yildirim; Guler Berkiten; Yavuz Uyar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-02-11

5.  Vessel sealing system uvulopalatoplasty versus uvulopalatal flap: a randomized, controlled study of efficacy and adverse effects.

Authors:  Prakobkiat Hirunwiwatkul; Jesada Kanjanaumporn
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-13       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Paediatric tonsillectomy: radiofrequency-based plasma dissection compared to cold dissection with sutures.

Authors:  L Di Rienzo Businco; G Coen Tirelli
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  [Hydrodissection for tonsillectomy. Results of a pilot study--intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain symptoms and risk of secondary hemorrhage].

Authors:  K J Lorenz; A Kresz; H Maier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Randomized study comparing postoperative pain between coblation and bipolar scissor tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Hanna Hasan; Hannu Raitiola; Wojciech Chrapek; Juhani Pukander
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Positional changes in the uvula tip after adenotonsillectomy in children: preliminary result.

Authors:  Suk Won Chang; Chan Il Song; Jeong Hong Kim; Gil-Chai Lim; Ju Wan Kang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.