Literature DB >> 2665823

EMG feedback for the treatment of upper-extremity dysfunction: can it be effective?

J Tries1.   

Abstract

This paper examines the application of EMG feedback for upper-extremity dysfunction secondary to neurologic injury. A rationale for the use of EMG feedback to enhance rotational components of upper-limb movement, train recruitment of the prime movers, and promote inhibition of motor responses that interfere with efficient and effortless movement is presented. Specific strategies that can be used to reinforce functional movement patterns are elaborated. A case study illustrating the application of the feedback strategies is provided. Despite sensory, perceptual, and cognitive impairments, a 53-year-old left hemiplegic obtained significant clinical upper-limb functional gains when given EMG feedback in conjunction with occupational therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2665823     DOI: 10.1007/bf00999339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul        ISSN: 0363-3586


  17 in total

1.  NEUROMUSCULAR RE-EDUCATION OF THE HEMIPLEGIC WITH THE AID OF THE ELECTROMYOGRAPH.

Authors:  J M ANDREWS
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1964-10       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Procedures for EMG biofeedback training in involved upper extremities of hemiplegic patients.

Authors:  J L Kelly; M P Baker; S L Wolf
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1979-12

3.  Developing strategies for biofeedback. Applications in neurologically handicapped patients.

Authors:  M Baker; E Regenos; S L Wolf; J V Basmajian
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1977-04

Review 4.  Electromyographic biofeedback applications to stroke patients. A critical review.

Authors:  S L Wolf
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1983-09

5.  EMG biofeedback therapy in the re-education of the hemiplegic shoulder in patients with sensory loss.

Authors:  A M Skelly; R M Kenedi
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.358

Review 6.  Electromyography--dynamic gross anatomy: a review.

Authors:  J V Basmajian
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1980-11

7.  EMG biofeedback in stroke: effect of patient characteristics.

Authors:  S L Wolf; M P Baker; J L Kelly
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status.

Authors:  S L Wolf; S A Binder-MacLeod
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1983-09

9.  Electromyographic feedback: effect on voluntary muscle contractions in paretic subjects.

Authors:  S J Middaugh; M C Miller
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Stroke treatment: comparison of integrated behavioral-physical therapy vs traditional physical therapy programs.

Authors:  J V Basmajian; C A Gowland; M A Finlayson; A L Hall; L R Swanson; P W Stratford; J E Trotter; M E Brandstater
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  3 in total

1.  On clinical efficacy: why biofeedback does--and does not--work.

Authors:  S J Middaugh
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1990-09

2.  Individual muscle contributions to push and recovery subtasks during wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Jeffery W Rankin; W Mark Richter; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping.

Authors:  E Taub; J E Crago; L D Burgio; T E Groomes; E W Cook; S C DeLuca; N E Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.