Emily Feinberg1, Michael Silverstein, Sara Donahue, Robin Bliss. 1. From the *Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA; Departments of †Community Health Sciences and ‡Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To quantify racial differences in receipt of early intervention (EI) services among children ages birth to 3 years. METHODS: Multivariable analyses of a nationally representative sample of children eligible for EI services using data from the Early Child Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort was conducted. Birth weight <1000 g, genetic and medical conditions associated with developmental delay, or low scores on a standardized measure of developmental performance defined EI eligibility. Receipt of EI services was ascertained from parent self-report. The effect of race on receipt of EI services was examined in main effect models and models stratified by EI qualifying condition, which was defined as either established medical condition or developmental delay in the absence of an underlying medical diagnosis. RESULTS: At 9 months of age, among the 1000 children eligible for EI services, 9% of children received services; there were no black-white racial differences in receipt of services. At 24 months of age, among the 1000 children eligible for EI services, 12% received services; black children were 5 times less likely to receive services than white children (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09, 0.39). In models stratified by qualifying condition, black children who qualified for services at 24 months based on developmental delay alone were less likely to receive services (aOR 0.09; 95% CI 0.02, 0.39); there were no differences by race among children who qualified based on established medical conditions (aOR 0.56; 95% CI 0.18, 1.72). CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities in EI service receipt, which were not present during infancy, emerged as children became toddlers. These disparities were found most consistently among children who qualified for services based on developmental delay alone.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify racial differences in receipt of early intervention (EI) services among children ages birth to 3 years. METHODS: Multivariable analyses of a nationally representative sample of children eligible for EI services using data from the Early Child Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort was conducted. Birth weight <1000 g, genetic and medical conditions associated with developmental delay, or low scores on a standardized measure of developmental performance defined EI eligibility. Receipt of EI services was ascertained from parent self-report. The effect of race on receipt of EI services was examined in main effect models and models stratified by EI qualifying condition, which was defined as either established medical condition or developmental delay in the absence of an underlying medical diagnosis. RESULTS: At 9 months of age, among the 1000 children eligible for EI services, 9% of children received services; there were no black-white racial differences in receipt of services. At 24 months of age, among the 1000 children eligible for EI services, 12% received services; black children were 5 times less likely to receive services than white children (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09, 0.39). In models stratified by qualifying condition, black children who qualified for services at 24 months based on developmental delay alone were less likely to receive services (aOR 0.09; 95% CI 0.02, 0.39); there were no differences by race among children who qualified based on established medical conditions (aOR 0.56; 95% CI 0.18, 1.72). CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities in EI service receipt, which were not present during infancy, emerged as children became toddlers. These disparities were found most consistently among children who qualified for services based on developmental delay alone.
Authors: Michael Silverstein; Nina Sand; Frances P Glascoe; Vidya B Gupta; Thomas P Tonniges; Karen G O'Connor Journal: Ambul Pediatr Date: 2006 Mar-Apr
Authors: David S Mandell; Lisa D Wiggins; Laura Arnstein Carpenter; Julie Daniels; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Maureen S Durkin; Ellen Giarelli; Michael J Morrier; Joyce S Nicholas; Jennifer A Pinto-Martin; Paul T Shattuck; Kathleen C Thomas; Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp; Russell S Kirby Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-12-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: C Jason Wang; Marc N Elliott; Jeannette Rogowski; Nelson Lim; Jessica A Ratner; Mark A Schuster Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2009-05-30 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Katharine E Zuckerman; Kimber M Mattox; Brianna K Sinche; Gregory S Blaschke; Christina Bethell Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: Zachary S Richardson; Elizabeth A Scully; Jodi K Dooling-Litfin; Natalie J Murphy; Briana Rigau; Mary A Khetani; Beth M McManus Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Elizabeth Peacock-Chambers; JoAnna K Leyenaar; Sheila Foss; Emily Feinberg; Donna Wilson; Peter D Friedmann; Paul Visintainer; Rachana Singh Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2019 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Kathleen A Mussatto; Danielle Hollenbeck-Pringle; Felicia Trachtenberg; Erica Sood; Renee Sananes; Nancy A Pike; Linda M Lambert; William T Mahle; David J Goldberg; Caren S Goldberg; Carolyn Dunbar-Masterson; Michelle Otto; Bradley S Marino; Bronwyn H Bartle; Ismee A Williams; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Sinai C Zyblewski; Victoria L Pemberton Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 1.093