Katharine E Zuckerman1, Alison E Chavez, Julie A Reeder. 1. *Division of General Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Doernbecher Children's Hospital, Portland, OR; †Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR; ‡Oregon Health Authority, Oregon WIC Program, Portland, OR.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess how staff at the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) address potential developmental delays and parent developmental concerns in children <5 years. METHODS: A Web-based survey of Oregon WIC staff in nonadministrative roles assessed staff interactions with parents regarding concerning child development/behavior, perceptions of connectedness with local developmental resources, and knowledge of typical child development. RESULTS: Staff (N = 153) responses indicated knowledge of typical child development, frequent interactions with families about child development, and frequent noticing of developmental concerns. However, most staff reported being less than very well connected to developmental resources. Open-ended responses suggested that staff frequently make direct referrals to early intervention, public health nurses, and others who can further assess developmental concerns. CONCLUSION: Although it is outside the primary scope of their work, developmental and behavioral concerns are frequently raised and addressed by WIC staff. Findings suggest that strengthening the existing referral processes and enhancing continuity of care between WIC and developmental providers may improve child outcomes and reduce disparities.
OBJECTIVE: To assess how staff at the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) address potential developmental delays and parent developmental concerns in children <5 years. METHODS: A Web-based survey of Oregon WIC staff in nonadministrative roles assessed staff interactions with parents regarding concerning child development/behavior, perceptions of connectedness with local developmental resources, and knowledge of typical child development. RESULTS: Staff (N = 153) responses indicated knowledge of typical child development, frequent interactions with families about child development, and frequent noticing of developmental concerns. However, most staff reported being less than very well connected to developmental resources. Open-ended responses suggested that staff frequently make direct referrals to early intervention, public health nurses, and others who can further assess developmental concerns. CONCLUSION: Although it is outside the primary scope of their work, developmental and behavioral concerns are frequently raised and addressed by WIC staff. Findings suggest that strengthening the existing referral processes and enhancing continuity of care between WIC and developmental providers may improve child outcomes and reduce disparities.
Authors: Coleen A Boyle; Sheree Boulet; Laura A Schieve; Robin A Cohen; Stephen J Blumberg; Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp; Susanna Visser; Michael D Kogan Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-05-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Deborah L Christensen; Jon Baio; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Deborah Bilder; Jane Charles; John N Constantino; Julie Daniels; Maureen S Durkin; Robert T Fitzgerald; Margaret Kurzius-Spencer; Li-Ching Lee; Sydney Pettygrove; Cordelia Robinson; Eldon Schulz; Chris Wells; Martha S Wingate; Walter Zahorodny; Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2016-04-01
Authors: Ashwini Lakshmanan; Ashley Y Song; Nicole Flores-Fenlon; Urvashi Parti; Douglas L Vanderbilt; Philippe S Friedlich; Roberta Williams; Michele Kipke Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: Ashwini Lakshmanan; Katrina Kubicek; Roberta Williams; Marisela Robles; Douglas L Vanderbilt; Christine B Mirzaian; Philippe S Friedlich; Michele Kipke Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 2.125