BACKGROUND: The predictive ability of dietary assessment methods to estimate specific circulating plasma carotenoid concentrations has been compared between African Americans and whites in only one study to date. OBJECTIVE: The predictive abilities of 24-h dietary recalls and a food-frequency questionnaire in reporting dietary carotenoids when measured against concentration biomarkers were assessed in African Americans and compared with the findings in whites. DESIGN: Data were collected from 250 generally healthy, nonsmoking white and African American participants aged 21-69 y, who completed 8 self-administered online 24-h dietary recalls and one National Cancer Institute diet-history questionnaire in the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Energetics Study. Mean intakes from 4-d dietary recalls were correlated with plasma xanthophyll concentrations (lutein + zeaxanthin and β-cryptoxanthin) and hydrocarbon carotenoids (lycopene, α-carotene, and β-carotene). RESULTS: Adjusted correlations of plasma carotenoids with reported dietary intakes for African Americans in the 24-h dietary recall ranged from 0.03 for β-carotene to 0.40 for β-cryptoxanthin. For whites, the correlations ranged from 0.13 for lycopene to 0.51 for β-cryptoxanthin. CONCLUSIONS: Despite stronger validity in reported energy intakes for African Americans than for whites in the 24-h dietary recall in the Energetics Study, both recalls and food-frequency dietary assessment methods yielded lower correlations in African Americans than in whites. This finding might be attributable to reporting differences in both dietary sources and food preparation or to racially related genetic variants influencing circulating concentrations. The current findings support the need to account for differences in race, age, sex, and body mass index in regression calibrations of dietary reports and measurement error adjustments.
BACKGROUND: The predictive ability of dietary assessment methods to estimate specific circulating plasma carotenoid concentrations has been compared between African Americans and whites in only one study to date. OBJECTIVE: The predictive abilities of 24-h dietary recalls and a food-frequency questionnaire in reporting dietary carotenoids when measured against concentration biomarkers were assessed in African Americans and compared with the findings in whites. DESIGN: Data were collected from 250 generally healthy, nonsmoking white and African American participants aged 21-69 y, who completed 8 self-administered online 24-h dietary recalls and one National Cancer Institute diet-history questionnaire in the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Energetics Study. Mean intakes from 4-d dietary recalls were correlated with plasma xanthophyll concentrations (lutein + zeaxanthin and β-cryptoxanthin) and hydrocarbon carotenoids (lycopene, α-carotene, and β-carotene). RESULTS: Adjusted correlations of plasma carotenoids with reported dietary intakes for African Americans in the 24-h dietary recall ranged from 0.03 for β-carotene to 0.40 for β-cryptoxanthin. For whites, the correlations ranged from 0.13 for lycopene to 0.51 for β-cryptoxanthin. CONCLUSIONS: Despite stronger validity in reported energy intakes for African Americans than for whites in the 24-h dietary recall in the Energetics Study, both recalls and food-frequency dietary assessment methods yielded lower correlations in African Americans than in whites. This finding might be attributable to reporting differences in both dietary sources and food preparation or to racially related genetic variants influencing circulating concentrations. The current findings support the need to account for differences in race, age, sex, and body mass index in regression calibrations of dietary reports and measurement error adjustments.
Authors: W C Leung; S Hessel; C Méplan; J Flint; V Oberhauser; F Tourniaire; J E Hesketh; J von Lintig; G Lietz Journal: FASEB J Date: 2008-12-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: L C Su; M Bui; A Kardinaal; J Gomez-Aracena; J Martin-Moreno; B Martin; M Thamm; N Simonsen; P van't Veer; F Kok; S Strain; L Kohlmeier Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Luigi Ferrucci; John R B Perry; Amy Matteini; Markus Perola; Toshiko Tanaka; Kaisa Silander; Neil Rice; David Melzer; Anna Murray; Christie Cluett; Linda P Fried; Demetrius Albanes; Anna-Maria Corsi; Antonio Cherubini; Jack Guralnik; Stefania Bandinelli; Andrew Singleton; Jarmo Virtamo; Jeremy Walston; Richard D Semba; Timothy M Frayling Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Lisa Gallicchio; Kristina Boyd; Genevieve Matanoski; Xuguang Grant Tao; Liwei Chen; Tram K Lam; Meredith Shiels; Edward Hammond; Karen A Robinson; Laura E Caulfield; James G Herman; Eliseo Guallar; Anthony J Alberg Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Sameera A Talegawkar; Elizabeth J Johnson; Teresa C Carithers; Herman A Taylor; Margaret L Bogle; Katherine L Tucker Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2007-12-06 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Kevin Cohen; Ying Liu; Jingqin Luo; Catherine M Appleton; Graham A Colditz Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-02-11 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kristi M Crowe-White; Venkata S Voruganti; Valentina Talevi; Tanja Dudenbostel; Vinoth A Nagabooshanam; Julie L Locher; Amy C Ellis Journal: Curr Dev Nutr Date: 2020-06-17
Authors: Tracy L Burrows; Megan E Rollo; Rebecca Williams; Lisa G Wood; Manohar L Garg; Megan Jensen; Clare E Collins Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 5.717