Literature DB >> 21388901

Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant- based breast reconstruction: evaluating the evidence.

T JoAnna Nguyen1, Joseph N Carey, Alex K Wong.   

Abstract

The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in implant based breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular to the point that a subset of surgeons use ADM for virtually every tissue expander/implant based reconstruction. While there may be a number of perceived and anecdotal advantages such as decreased post-operative pain, increased initial expander fill volume, and improved aesthetic outcome, it remains unclear as to whether there is sufficient evidence to support these as well as other claims or its routine use. In this review, we identified all papers in the PubMed and Medline databases that addressed outcomes of the use of ADM in single and multiple staged implant based breast reconstruction. Papers were evaluated for any claim of benefit in using ADM in breast reconstruction. The following perceived advantages were supported solely by anecdotal reports and opinions: reduction in post-op pain, decreased operative time, precise control of the lateral and IMF, maximal use of mastectomy skin flaps, and improved lower pole expansion. There was inconsistent data for commonly perceived advantages, such as: eliminating the need for expanders, increased initial fill volumes, fewer expansions, faster time to reconstruction completion, decreased rate of revision, and improved aesthetic outcome. We found consistent support for a decreased incidence of capsular contracture; however the existing reports have limited long term follow-up. Despite the many heralded benefits of ADM in breast reconstruction, the data supporting these claims is mostly anecdotal. Both long term outcomes and randomized controlled prospective studies are needed in order to definitively evaluate the perceived advantages of ADM in breast reconstruction.
Copyright © 2011 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21388901     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  36 in total

1.  Update on breast reconstruction techniques and indications.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Petit; Mario Rietjens; Visnu Lohsiriwat; Piercarlo Rey; Cristina Garusi; Francesca De Lorenzi; Stefano Martella; Andrea Manconi; Benedetta Barbieri; Krishna B Clough
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Surveillance and Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Breast Oncologic Surgery with Immediate Reconstruction.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Ida K Fox
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-11

Review 3.  Alloplastic adjuncts in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Miguel S Cabalag; Marie Rostek; George S Miller; Michael P Chae; Tam Quinn; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

Review 4.  Evidence for the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Paula R Gravina; Rowland W Pettit; Matthew J Davis; Sebastian J Winocour; Jesse C Selber
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Human Acellular Dermal Matrix (Epiflex®) in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Skin- and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Treatment of Capsular Fibrosis: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational NOGGO-AWOGyn Study.

Authors:  Lea Beier; Andree Faridi; Corina Neumann; Stefan Paepke; Christine Mau; Maren Keller; Hans Joachim Strittmatter; Claudia Gerber-Schäfer; Lelia Bauer; Maria Margarete Karsten; Sherko Kümmel; Jens-Uwe Blohmer
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Remodeling Characteristics and Collagen Distributions of Biologic Scaffold Materials Biopsied From Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Sites.

Authors:  Jaime A Cavallo; Noopur Gangopadhyay; Jason Dudas; Andres A Roma; Mateusz S Jasielec; Jack Baty; Sara Baalman; Margaret M Frisella; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn; Brent D Matthews; Corey R Deeken
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Safety and Efficacy of Smooth Surface Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Berry Fairchild; Warren Ellsworth; Jesse C Selber; David P Bogue; Dmitry Zavlin; Stephanie Nemir; Cristina M Checka; Mark W Clemens
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.283

8.  Acellular Dermal Matrix in Reconstructive Breast Surgery: Survey of Current Practice among Plastic Surgeons.

Authors:  Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Pieter G L Koolen; Azra A Ashraf; Kuylhee Kim; Marc A M Mureau; Bernard T Lee; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-05-07

Review 9.  Acellular dermal matrices and radiotherapy in breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Luigi Valdatta; Anna Giulia Cattaneo; Igor Pellegatta; Stefano Scamoni; Anna Minuti; Mario Cherubino
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2014-05-21

10.  Esthetic Outcomes of ADM-Assisted Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Khang T Nguyen; Lauren M Mioton; John T Smetona; Akhil K Seth; John Y Kim
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-12-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.