Literature DB >> 31632205

Evidence for the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Paula R Gravina1, Rowland W Pettit1, Matthew J Davis1, Sebastian J Winocour1, Jesse C Selber2.   

Abstract

Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are tissue grafts that have been specially processed to remove all cellular components. These machined biological scaffolds have become popular in a variety of surgical settings due to their rapid incorporation into living tissue. As ADMs are highly malleable and cause minimal inflammation, they have come to serve as a useful tool in implant-based breast reconstruction procedures. The major benefits of using an ADM in this setting include superior initial breast contouring, decreased risk of capsular contracture after implant insertion, and consistent sustained positioning of the reconstructed breast. Despite these advantages, these tissue grafts are foreign to the host, and postoperative complications following ADM insertion, including infection and seroma, have been well documented. When considering using ADMs in this setting, it is important to first consider patient-specific factors that could preclude their use, such as low body mass index, small breasts, or a history of radiation exposure to the breast tissue. ADM grafts are also expensive, which may present another barrier to their use. Review of the literature ultimately suggests a continued role for ADMs in implant-based breast reconstruction, and continued research in this field is warranted. © Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acellular dermal matrix; breast reconstruction; implant-based reconstruction

Year:  2019        PMID: 31632205      PMCID: PMC6797488          DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1696986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Plast Surg        ISSN: 1535-2188            Impact factor:   2.314


  45 in total

1.  Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs.

Authors:  Amy S Colwell; Branimir Damjanovic; Bita Zahedi; Laura Medford-Davis; Catherine Hertl; William G Austen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Comparison of different ADM materials in breast surgery.

Authors:  Angela Cheng; Michel Saint-Cyr
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 3.  Low incidence of complications using polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) mesh in breast reconstruction: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nelson Rodriguez-Unda; Stephanie Leiva; Hsu-Tang Cheng; Stella M Seal; Carisa M Cooney; Gedge D Rosson
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  The effect of AlloDerm envelopes on periprosthetic capsule formation with and without radiation.

Authors:  Ewa Komorowska-Timek; Kerby C Oberg; Tomasz A Timek; Daila S Gridley; Duncan A G Miles
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  An algorithmic approach for selective acellular dermal matrix use in immediate two-stage breast reconstruction: indications and outcomes.

Authors:  Sumanas W Jordan; Nima Khavanin; Neil A Fine; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  Acellular dermal matrix in cosmetic breast procedures and capsular contracture.

Authors:  M Mark Mofid
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.283

7.  Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Kristy L Kummerow; Liping Du; David F Penson; Yu Shyr; Mary A Hooks
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes.

Authors:  Hani Sbitany; Sven N Sandeen; Ashley N Amalfi; Mark S Davenport; Howard N Langstein
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  A Comparison of Psychological Response, Body Image, Sexuality, and Quality of Life between Immediate and Delayed Autologous Tissue Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Long-Term Outcome Study.

Authors:  Toni Zhong; Jiayi Hu; Shaghayegh Bagher; Anthony Vo; Anne C O'Neill; Kate Butler; Christine B Novak; Stefan O P Hofer; Kelly A Metcalfe
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Immediate single-stage breast reconstruction using implants and human acellular dermal tissue matrix with adjustment of the lower pole of the breast to reduce unwanted lift.

Authors:  Bruce M Topol; Edward F Dalton; Teresa Ponn; Connie J Campbell
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.539

View more
  2 in total

1.  Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix for Two-Staged Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: An Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Jessica Luo; Rhett N Willis; Suzanna M Ohlsen; Meghan Piccinin; Neal Moores; Alvin C Kwok; Jayant P Agarwal
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2022-04-06

Review 2.  Submuscular and Pre-Pectoral ADM Assisted Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Roberto Cuomo
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.