Literature DB >> 21388275

Lack of nontargeted effects in murine bone marrow after low-dose in vivo X irradiation.

Nikolay A Zyuzikov1, Philip J Coates, John M Parry, Sally A Lorimore, Eric G Wright.   

Abstract

Exposure to high doses of ionizing radiation unequivocally produces adverse health effects including malignancy. At low doses the situation is much less clear, because effects are generally too small to be estimated directly by epidemiology, and extrapolation of risk and establishment of international rules and standards rely on the linear no-threshold (LNT) concept. Claims that low doses are more damaging than would be expected from LNT have been made on the basis of in vitro studies of nontargeted bystander effects and genomic instability, but relevant investigations of primary cells and tissues are limited. Here we show that after low-dose low-LET in vivo radiation exposures in the 0-100-mGy range of murine bone marrow there is no evidence of a bystander effect, assessed by p53 pathway signaling, nor is there any evidence for longer-term chromosomal instability in the bone marrow at doses below 1000 mGy. The data are not consistent with speculations based on in vitro nontargeted effects that low-dose X radiation is more damaging than would be expected from linear extrapolation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21388275     DOI: 10.1667/RR2386.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  9 in total

1.  A stochastic markov model of cellular response to radiation.

Authors:  Krzysztof Wojciech Fornalski; Ludwik Dobrzyński; Marek Krzysztof Janiak
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Investigation of the bystander effect in CHO-K1 cells.

Authors:  Urszula Kaźmierczak; Dariusz Banaś; Janusz Braziewicz; Iwona Buraczewska; Joanna Czub; Marian Jaskóła; Łukasz Kaźmierczak; Andrzej Korman; Marcin Kruszewski; Anna Lankoff; Halina Lisowska; Marta Nesteruk; Zygmunt Szefliński; Maria Wojewódzka
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-05-19

3.  What mechanisms/processes underlie radiation-induced genomic instability?

Authors:  Andrei V Karotki; Keith Baverstock
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Alternative medicine techniques have non-linear effects on radiation response and can alter the expression of radiation induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Richard Smith; Matthew Henry; Colin Seymour; Raimond Wong
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  An evaluation of novel real-time technology as a tool for measurement of radiobiological and radiation-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Mohammad Johari Ibahim; Jeffrey C Crosbie; Premila Paiva; Yuqing Yang; Marina Zaitseva; Peter A W Rogers
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Uncomfortable issues in radiation protection posed by low-dose radiobiology.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 7.  Cancer risk at low doses of ionizing radiation: artificial neural networks inference from atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  Masao S Sasaki; Akira Tachibana; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 8.  Mechanisms and biological importance of photon-induced bystander responses: do they have an impact on low-dose radiation responses.

Authors:  Masanori Tomita; Munetoshi Maeda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  The dose and dose-rate effects of paternal irradiation on transgenerational instability in mice: a radiotherapy connection.

Authors:  Safeer K Mughal; Andrey E Myazin; Leonid P Zhavoronkov; Alexander V Rubanovich; Yuri E Dubrova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.