Literature DB >> 21387176

The clinical benefit of medial support screws in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures: a prospective randomized study.

Lei Zhang1, Jinyou Zheng, Weiliang Wang, Guangmao Lin, Yijiang Huang, Jin Zheng, Ghamor-Amegavi Edem Prince, Guojing Yang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of medial support screws for locking plating of proximal humerus fractures.
METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients underwent prospective treatment for proximal humerus fractures with locking plates between October 2007 and September 2008. Sixty-eight patients accomplished a mean 30.8-month follow-up and were randomized into two groups: 39 patients were treated with only a locking plate and were classified in the -MSS (medial support screw) group, and 29 patients were included in the + MSS group, which were fixed with additional medial support screws. Clinical and radiological investigations were performed in both groups.
RESULTS: The fractures united at an average of 13.6 weeks after final surgery. Comparably better shoulder function recovery was achieved in the +MSS group with regard to the Constant shoulder score (P = 0.01), with the respective excellent and good rates of 79% and 62%. Eleven patients developed various complications. A statistical difference (P = 0.036) was observed regarding the failure rate (23.1% in the -MSS group vs. 3.4% in the +MSS group). The early loss of fixation was related to higher age (P < 0.001) and less initial neck-shaft angle (NSA) (P = 0.011) of the patients. However, bone mineral density was not significantly associated with loss of fixation (P = 0.076). Although no difference was found in all types of the fractures between the +MSS and -MSS groups regarding immediate postoperative NSA, we observed a significantly lower final NSA in the -MSS group and greater secondary angle loss in the subgroup of Neer three-part (P = 0.033 and 0.015, respectively) and four-part fractures (P = 0.043 and 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical reduction can substantially decrease the risk of postoperative failure in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures. Medial support for proximal humerus fractures seems to have no benefits in Neer two-part fractures. However, the additional medial support screws inserted into the medio-inferior region of the humeral head may help to enhance mechanical stability in complex fractures and allow for better maintenance of reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21387176      PMCID: PMC3193968          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1227-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  21 in total

1.  Effect of screw placement on fixation in the humeral head.

Authors:  A S Liew; J A Johnson; S D Patterson; G J King; D G Chess
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Long-term outcome of a proximal humerus fracture predicted after 1 year: a 13-year prospective population-based follow-up study of 47 patients.

Authors:  Christian Olsson; Anders Nordquist; Claes J Petersson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Proximal humeral fractures: regional differences in bone mineral density of the humeral head affect the fixation strength of cancellous screws.

Authors:  Markus J Tingart; Janne Lehtinen; David Zurakowski; Jon J P Warner; Maria Apreleva
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation.

Authors:  C S Neer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Fractures in the proximal humerus: functional outcome and evaluation of 70 patients treated in hospital.

Authors:  Tore Fjalestad; Knut Strømsøe; Judith Blücher; Bjørn Tennøe
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Hybrid locked plating of osteoporotic fractures of the humerus.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Matthew H Griffith; Demetris Demetrakopoulos; Robert H Brophy; Andrew Grose; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Biomechanical in vitro assessment of fixed angle plating using a new concept of locking for the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Götz Röderer; Florian Gebhard; Gert Krischak; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lutz Claes
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Nonunions of the humerus.

Authors:  David A Volgas; James P Stannard; Jorge E Alonso
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Where should implants be anchored in the humeral head?

Authors:  Pierre Hepp; Helmut Lill; Hermann Bail; Jan Korner; Manuel Niederhagen; Norbert P Haas; Christoph Josten; Georg N Duda
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  41 in total

1.  Complex fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly--outcome and complications after locking plate fixation.

Authors:  B Schliemann; J Siemoneit; Ch Theisen; C Kösters; A Weimann; M J Raschke
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-05

2.  The Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fracture Using Internal Fixation with Fixed-angle Plates.

Authors:  Patrick Ziegler; Sven Maier; Ulrich Stöckle; Markus Gühring; Fabian M Stuby
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Management of proximal humerus fractures in adults.

Authors:  Leonidas Vachtsevanos; Lydia Hayden; Aravind S Desai; Asterios Dramis
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

4.  The fragility and reverse fragility indices of proximal humerus fracture randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter William Kyriakides; Blake Joseph Schultz; Kenneth Egol; Philipp Leucht
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Open reduction and fixation with a locking plate without bone grafting is a reasonable and safe option for treating proximal humerus nonunion.

Authors:  Stefan Quadlbauer; Georg J Hofmann; Martin Leixnering; Rudolf Rosenauer; Thomas Hausner; Jürgen Reichetseder
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Open reduction internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Marschall B Berkes; Milton T M Little; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-03

7.  Postoperative Evaluation of Reduction Loss in Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Comparison of Plain Radiographs and Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Xiao-Yang Jia; Yan-Xi Chen; Min-Fei Qiang; Kun Zhang; Hao-Bo Li; Yu-Chen Jiang; Yi-Jie Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.071

8.  Proximal humeral fractures: an understanding of the ideal plate positioning.

Authors:  Pedro José Labronici; Rodrigo Pires e Albuquerque; Vinícius Schott; Robinson Esteves Santos Pires; Willian Dias Belangero; José Sérgio Franco
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Open reduction and internal fixation of three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures by intra-focal distraction: observational study of twenty five cases.

Authors:  Levon Doursounian; Anthony Le Sant; Raphael Mauprivez; Anne Miquel; Violaine Beauthier-Landauer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Locking plate for proximal humeral fracture in the elderly population: serial change of neck shaft angle.

Authors:  Aditya C Pawaskar; Kee-Won Lee; Jong-Min Kim; Jin-Woong Park; Iman W Aminata; Hong-Jun Jung; Jae-Myeung Chun; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-08-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.