Literature DB >> 22949952

Locking plate for proximal humeral fracture in the elderly population: serial change of neck shaft angle.

Aditya C Pawaskar1, Kee-Won Lee, Jong-Min Kim, Jin-Woong Park, Iman W Aminata, Hong-Jun Jung, Jae-Myeung Chun, In-Ho Jeon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted this radiographic study in the elderly population with proximal humeral fracture aiming to evaluate 1) the serial changes of neck-shaft angle after locking plate fixation and 2) find relationship between change in neck shaft angle and various factors such as age, fracture pattern, severity of osteoporosis, medial support and initial reduction angle.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients who underwent surgical treatment for proximal humeral fracture with locking plate between September 2008 and August 2010 are included. True anteroposterior and axillary lateral radiographs were made postoperatively and at each follow-up visit. Measurement of neck shaft angle was done at immediate postoperative, 3 months postoperative and a final follow-up (average, 11 months; range, 8 to 17 months). Severity of osteoporosis was assessed using cortical thickness suggested by Tingart et al.
RESULTS: The mean neck shaft angles were 133.6° (range, 100° to 116°) at immediate postoperative, 129.8° (range, 99° to 150°) at 3 months postoperative and 128.4° (range, 97° to 145°) at final follow-up. The mean loss in the neck-shaft angle in the first 3 months was 3.8° as compared to 1.3° in the period between 3 months and final follow-up. This was statistically significant (p = 0.002), indicating that most of the fall in neck shaft angle occurs in the first three months after surgery. Relationship between neck shaft angle change and age (p = 0.29), fracture pattern (p = 0.41), cortical thickness (p = 0.21), medial support (p = 0.63) and initial reduction accuracy (p = 0.65) are not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The proximal humerus locking plate maintains reliable radiographic results even in the elderly population with proximal humerus fracture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly population; Locking plate; Neck shaft angle; Proximal humeral fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22949952      PMCID: PMC3425651          DOI: 10.4055/cios.2012.4.3.209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg        ISSN: 2005-291X


  29 in total

1.  Effect of screw placement on fixation in the humeral head.

Authors:  A S Liew; J A Johnson; S D Patterson; G J King; D G Chess
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the PHILOS plate: early experience.

Authors:  Athanasios Koukakis; Constantinos D Apostolou; Tarun Taneja; Dimitrios S Korres; Alexander Amini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  Markus J Tingart; Maria Apreleva; Dietrich von Stechow; David Zurakowski; Jon J Warner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-05

4.  Relationship of cortical thickness of the proximal humerus and pullout strength of a locked plate and screw construct.

Authors:  Maegen J Wallace; Gary Bledsoe; Berton R Moed; Heidi A Israel; Scott G Kaar
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Rigid internal fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus in older patients.

Authors:  B Hintermann; H H Trouillier; D Schäfer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-11

6.  Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus.

Authors:  A J Wijgman; W Roolker; T W Patt; E L F B Raaymakers; R K Marti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Percutaneous pinning of the proximal part of the humerus. An anatomic study.

Authors:  D J Rowles; J E McGrory
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Yoram Weil; Joseph U Barker; Bryan T Kelly; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty of fractures of the proximal humerus: outcomes in a consecutive case series.

Authors:  Johannes D Bastian; Ralph Hertel
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with locking proximal humeral plate (LPHP) in elderly patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ramchander Siwach; Roop Singh; Rajesh Kumar Rohilla; Virender Singh Kadian; Sukhbir Singh Sangwan; Manjeet Dhanda
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-07-16
View more
  4 in total

1.  Postoperative Evaluation of Reduction Loss in Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Comparison of Plain Radiographs and Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Xiao-Yang Jia; Yan-Xi Chen; Min-Fei Qiang; Kun Zhang; Hao-Bo Li; Yu-Chen Jiang; Yi-Jie Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.071

2.  Serial changes in the head-shaft angle of proximal humeral fractures treated by placing locking plates: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ji-Qi Wang; Bing-Jie Jiang; Wei-Jun Guo; You-Ming Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Proximal humeral internal locking plate combined with a custom neutral-position shoulder and elbow sling for proximal humerus fractures: A randomized study.

Authors:  Xiong Chen; Zheng-Xi Yu; Huai-Yun Wang; Feng Shen; Guo-Bing Lin; Sheng Wang; Zong-Sheng Yin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Inter-rater agreement among shoulder surgeons on treatment options for proximal humeral fractures among shoulder surgeons.

Authors:  Hyojune Kim; Si-Jung Song; In-Ho Jeon; Kyoung Hwan Koh
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2022-01-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.