Robert G Frykberg1, David V Williams. 1. Podiatry Section, Carl T. Hayden Veterans Administration Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85012, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to assess the benefits of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) versus traditional wound therapies in reducing the incidence of lower-extremity amputations in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. METHODS: Administrative claims data for patients with diabetic foot ulcers from commercial payers (n=3,524) and Medicare (n=12,795) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into NPWT and control/traditional therapy groups on the basis of administrative codes. Risk-adjustment procedures were then performed to match patient risk categories (through total treatment costs) and wound severities (through debridement depth). RESULTS: The incidence of amputations in the NPWT groups was lower than that in the control groups. For the cost-based risk-adjustment analysis, amputation incidences with NPWT versus traditional therapy were 35% lower in the Medicare sample (10.8% versus 16.6%; P=.0077) and 34% lower in the commercial payer sample (14.1% versus 21.4%; P=.0951). Whereas overall amputation rates increased progressively with increasing wound debridement depth in both control groups, the same increasing trend did not occur in the NPWT groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetic foot ulcers in the Medicare sample treated with NPWT had a lower incidence of amputations than those undergoing traditional wound therapy; this finding was evident in wounds of varying depth in both populations studied.
BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to assess the benefits of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) versus traditional wound therapies in reducing the incidence of lower-extremity amputations in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. METHODS: Administrative claims data for patients with diabetic foot ulcers from commercial payers (n=3,524) and Medicare (n=12,795) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into NPWT and control/traditional therapy groups on the basis of administrative codes. Risk-adjustment procedures were then performed to match patient risk categories (through total treatment costs) and wound severities (through debridement depth). RESULTS: The incidence of amputations in the NPWT groups was lower than that in the control groups. For the cost-based risk-adjustment analysis, amputation incidences with NPWT versus traditional therapy were 35% lower in the Medicare sample (10.8% versus 16.6%; P=.0077) and 34% lower in the commercial payer sample (14.1% versus 21.4%; P=.0951). Whereas overall amputation rates increased progressively with increasing wound debridement depth in both control groups, the same increasing trend did not occur in the NPWT groups. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with diabetic foot ulcers in the Medicare sample treated with NPWT had a lower incidence of amputations than those undergoing traditional wound therapy; this finding was evident in wounds of varying depth in both populations studied.
Authors: Sarah J Whitehead; Véronique L Forest-Bendien; Jean-Louis Richard; Serge Halimi; Georges Ha Van; Paul Trueman Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 3.315