Literature DB >> 21385161

A moment-adjusted imputation method for measurement error models.

Laine Thomas1, Leonard Stefanski, Marie Davidian.   

Abstract

Studies of clinical characteristics frequently measure covariates with a single observation. This may be a mismeasured version of the "true" phenomenon due to sources of variability like biological fluctuations and device error. Descriptive analyses and outcome models that are based on mismeasured data generally will not reflect the corresponding analyses based on the "true" covariate. Many statistical methods are available to adjust for measurement error. Imputation methods like regression calibration and moment reconstruction are easily implemented but are not always adequate. Sophisticated methods have been proposed for specific applications like density estimation, logistic regression, and survival analysis. However, it is frequently infeasible for an analyst to adjust each analysis separately, especially in preliminary studies where resources are limited. We propose an imputation approach called moment-adjusted imputation that is flexible and relatively automatic. Like other imputation methods, it can be used to adjust a variety of analyses quickly, and it performs well under a broad range of circumstances. We illustrate the method via simulation and apply it to a study of systolic blood pressure and health outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21385161      PMCID: PMC3208089          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01569.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  14 in total

1.  Regression analysis when covariates are regression parameters of a random effects model for observed longitudinal measurements.

Authors:  C Y Wang; N Wang; S Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Linear mixed models with flexible distributions of random effects for longitudinal data.

Authors:  D Zhang; M Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Is a series of blood pressure measurements by the general practitioner or the patient a reliable alternative to ambulatory blood pressure measurement? A study in general practice with reference to short-term and long-term between-visit variability.

Authors:  M M Brueren; P van Limpt; H J Schouten; P W de Leeuw; J W van Ree
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Smooth nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation for population pharmacokinetics, with application to quinidine.

Authors:  M Davidian; A R Gallant
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-10

5.  Conditional estimation for generalized linear models when covariates are subject-specific parameters in a mixed model for longitudinal measurements.

Authors:  Erning Li; Daowen Zhang; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  A new method for dealing with measurement error in explanatory variables of regression models.

Authors:  Laurence S Freedman; Vitaly Fainberg; Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The problem of profound mismeasurement and the power of epidemiological studies of diet and cancer.

Authors:  J L Freudenheim; J R Marshall
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.900

8.  Statistical methods to assess and minimize the role of intra-individual variability in obscuring the relationship between dietary lipids and serum cholesterol.

Authors:  K Liu; J Stamler; A Dyer; J McKeever; P McKeever
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1978

9.  How many self-measured blood pressure readings are needed to estimate hypertensive patients' "true" blood pressure?

Authors:  M P García-Vera; J Sanz
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1999-02

10.  A comparison of regression calibration, moment reconstruction and imputation for adjusting for covariate measurement error in regression.

Authors:  Laurence S Freedman; Douglas Midthune; Raymond J Carroll; Victor Kipnis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  7 in total

1.  Moment Adjusted Imputation for Multivariate Measurement Error Data with Applications to Logistic Regression.

Authors:  Laine Thomas; Leonard A Stefanski; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 2-More complex methods of adjustment and advanced topics.

Authors:  Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Ruth H Keogh; Victor Kipnis; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Helmut Küchenhoff; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Moment reconstruction and moment-adjusted imputation when exposure is generated by a complex, nonlinear random effects modeling process.

Authors:  Cornelis J Potgieter; Rubin Wei; Victor Kipnis; Laurence S Freedman; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Censoring Trace-Level Environmental Data: Statistical Analysis Considerations to Limit Bias.

Authors:  Barbara Jane George; Leslie Gains-Germain; Kristin Broms; Kelly Black; Marschall Furman; Michael D Hays; Kent W Thomas; Jane Ellen Simmons
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  A toolkit for measurement error correction, with a focus on nutritional epidemiology.

Authors:  Ruth H Keogh; Ian R White
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Separating variability in healthcare practice patterns from random error.

Authors:  Laine E Thomas; Phillip J Schulte
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Refinements of LC-MS/MS Spectral Counting Statistics Improve Quantification of Low Abundance Proteins.

Authors:  Ha Yun Lee; Eunhee G Kim; Hye Ryeon Jung; Jin Woo Jung; Han Byeol Kim; Jin Won Cho; Kristine M Kim; Eugene C Yi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.