Literature DB >> 21383671

The predictability of T3 disease in staging MRI following prostate biopsy decreases in patients with high initial PSA and Gleason score.

Young Hwii Ko1, Deuk Jae Sung, Sung Gu Kang, Seok Ho Kang, Jeong Gu Lee, Je Jong Kim, Jun Cheon.   

Abstract

To obtain improved accuracy in predicting extracapsular extension (ECE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), we evaluated the variables affecting the predictability of staging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, phased-array coil) and estimated their impact on accuracy between preoperative MRI staging and histological outcome. A total of 121 patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy (RALP) were included. Following transrectal biopsy, all enrolled patients had undergone MRI for staging work-up. After RALP, only 43.8% (53/121) of the patients were matched with the MRI predicted stage. Compared to the matched group in the prediction of ECE, the unmatched group had significantly higher initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA, 12.8 ng ml⁻¹ versus 8.1 ng ml⁻¹, P = 0.048). In the prediction of SVI, initial PSA (8.1 ng ml⁻¹ versus 17.3 ng ml⁻¹, P = 0.009) and biopsy Gleason score (6.5 versus 7.6, P = 0.035) were significantly higher in the unmatched group. When applying clinical cutoffs of initial PSA of 10 and 20 ng ml⁻¹, the accuracy of MRI in the prediction of ECE was decreased in the group with PSA over 20 ng ml⁻¹ (75.6, 64.5 and 37.5%, P = 0.01), and this group had significantly decreased accuracy of MRI in the prediction of SVI (91.5, 77.4 and 37.5%, P<0.01). Applying the clinical cutoff of a Gleason score of 7, the accuracy of MRI in the prediction of SVI was decreased in the higher Gleason score group (93.9, 82.1 and 62.9%, P = 0.01). Thus, for these patient groups, to obtain margin negativity during radical prostatectomy, operative findings, rather than post-biopsy MRI images, may provide substantial information, implying a clinical advantage in conducting MRI before prostate biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21383671      PMCID: PMC3739336          DOI: 10.1038/aja.2010.165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  33 in total

1.  Organ-confined prostate cancer: effect of prior transrectal biopsy on endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; Fergus V Coakley; Ying Lu; Jeffrey D Olpin; Louis Wu; Benjamin M Yeh; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of prostatic cancer: does detection vary between high and low gleason score tumors?

Authors:  S Ikonen; P Kärkkäinen; L Kivisaari; J O Salo; K Taari; T Vehmas; P Tervahartiala; S Rannikko
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 4.104

3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is a useful modality for the precise detection and staging of early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Noboru Hara; Mina Okuizumi; Hiroshi Koike; Makoto Kawaguchi; Vladimir Bilim
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 4.104

4.  Use of endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M J Chelsky; M D Schnall; E J Seidmon; H M Pollack
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  MR imaging and sonography of early prostatic cancer: pathologic and imaging features that influence identification and diagnosis.

Authors:  J H Ellis; C Tempany; M S Sarin; C Gatsonis; M D Rifkin; B J McNeil
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Prostate cancer localization with endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging: effect of clinical data on reader accuracy.

Authors:  Rajpal Dhingsa; Aliya Qayyum; Fergus V Coakley; Ying Lu; Kirk D Jones; Mark G Swanson; Peter R Carroll; Hedvig Hricak; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Seminal vesicles: biopsy-related hemorrhage simulating tumor invasion at endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  S A Mirowitz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Determining the volume of prostatic carcinoma: value of MR imaging with an external-array coil.

Authors:  F G Sommer; H V Nghiem; R Herfkens; J McNeal; R N Low
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marc R Engelbrecht; Gerrit J Jager; Robert J Laheij; André L M Verbeek; H J van Lier; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Michael Mullerad; Hui-Ni Chen; Steven C Eberhardt; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  Oncological outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in a multiracial Asian population.

Authors:  Low Wei Xiang Alvin; Sim Hong Gee; Huang Hong Hong; Cheng Wai Sam Christopher; Ho Sien Sun Henry; Lau Kam On Weber; Tan Puay Hoon; Lee Lui Shiong
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-07-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.