Literature DB >> 2138257

Neuropsychological dimensions of the fragile X syndrome: support for a non-dominant hemisphere dysfunction hypothesis.

S F Crowe1, D A Hay.   

Abstract

This study contends that males with the fragile X syndrome feature problems in the visuospatial sphere as compared with Down syndrome males matched on vocabulary ability. Fragile X males suffer impairments of constructional functions, as demonstrated by their poor performance on block construction tests and on drawing tasks. These problems exist in association with visuoperceptive impairments, including the inability to reliably estimate angular relationships (Judgement of Line Orientation). They have shortened Digit and Corsi spans, and may feature some deficits in left hand co-ordination. The observation of a pervasive non-verbal deficit may also apply to carrier females, who despite functioning at an overall higher level, feature a similar pattern of deficits. It is possible that the deficit in non-dominant hemisphere functioning may be a pathognomonic feature of the chromosomal abnormality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2138257     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90082-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  14 in total

Review 1.  Visuo-spatial ability in individuals with Down syndrome: is it really a strength?

Authors:  Yingying Yang; Frances A Conners; Edward C Merrill
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2014-04-20

2.  Working memory subsystems and task complexity in young boys with Fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  S Baker; S Hooper; M Skinner; D Hatton; J Schaaf; P Ornstein; D Bailey
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2010-12-01

3.  Fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  J Turk
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Between-generation differences in ascertainment and penetrance: relevance to genetic hypotheses in fragile X.

Authors:  D Z Loesch; L J Sheffield; D A Hay
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Contrast detection in infants with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  F Farzin; D Whitney; R J Hagerman; S M Rivera
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Genotype-phenotype relationships in fragile X syndrome: a family study.

Authors:  D Z Loesch; R Huggins; D A Hay; A K Gedeon; J C Mulley; G R Sutherland
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Frontostriatal deficits in fragile X syndrome: relation to FMR1 gene expression.

Authors:  V Menon; J Leroux; C D White; A L Reiss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Prefrontal social cognition network dysfunction underlying face encoding and social anxiety in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Laura M Holsen; Kim M Dalton; Tom Johnstone; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Autism: the point of view from fragile X studies.

Authors:  C Feinstein; A L Reiss
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1998-10

10.  FRAXE and mental retardation.

Authors:  J C Mulley; S Yu; D Z Loesch; D A Hay; A Donnelly; A K Gedeon; P Carbonell; I López; G Glover; I Gabarrón
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.