Literature DB >> 21381969

Media multitasking behavior: concurrent television and computer usage.

S Adam Brasel1, James Gips.   

Abstract

Changes in the media landscape have made simultaneous usage of the computer and television increasingly commonplace, but little research has explored how individuals navigate this media multitasking environment. Prior work suggests that self-insight may be limited in media consumption and multitasking environments, reinforcing a rising need for direct observational research. A laboratory experiment recorded both younger and older individuals as they used a computer and television concurrently, multitasking across television and Internet content. Results show that individuals are attending primarily to the computer during media multitasking. Although gazes last longer on the computer when compared to the television, the overall distribution of gazes is strongly skewed toward very short gazes only a few seconds in duration. People switched between media at an extreme rate, averaging more than 4 switches per min and 120 switches over the 27.5-minute study exposure. Participants had little insight into their switching activity and recalled their switching behavior at an average of only 12 percent of their actual switching rate revealed in the objective data. Younger individuals switched more often than older individuals, but other individual differences such as stated multitasking preference and polychronicity had little effect on switching patterns or gaze duration. This overall pattern of results highlights the importance of exploring new media environments, such as the current drive toward media multitasking, and reinforces that self-monitoring, post hoc surveying, and lay theory may offer only limited insight into how individuals interact with media.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21381969      PMCID: PMC3171998          DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw        ISSN: 2152-2715


  7 in total

Review 1.  Automatic behaviour: efficient not mindless.

Authors:  L L Saling; J G Phillips
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Electronic media use, reading, and academic distractibility in college youth.

Authors:  Laura E Levine; Bradley M Waite; Laura L Bowman
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2007-08

Review 3.  The limits of top-down control of visual attention.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Artem V Belopolsky; Judith C Peters; Jasper G Wijnen; Martijn Meeter; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-07-26

4.  Cognitive control in media multitaskers.

Authors:  Eyal Ophir; Clifford Nass; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The role of awareness in processing of oculomotor capture: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Artem V Belopolsky; Arthur F Kramer; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A short rating scale as a potential measure of pattern A behavior.

Authors:  R W Bortner
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1969-07

7.  Distractions, distractions: does instant messaging affect college students' performance on a concurrent reading comprehension task?

Authors:  Annie Beth Fox; Jonathan Rosen; Mary Crawford
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2009-02
  7 in total
  11 in total

1.  Media multitasking in adolescence.

Authors:  Matthew S Cain; Julia A Leonard; John D E Gabrieli; Amy S Finn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

2.  Volitional media multitasking: awareness of performance costs and modulation of media multitasking as a function of task demand.

Authors:  Brandon C W Ralph; Paul Seli; Kristin E Wilson; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-07-17

3.  Multitasking With Television Among Adolescents.

Authors:  Claire G Christensen; David Bickham; Craig S Ross; Michael Rich
Journal:  J Broadcast Electron Media       Date:  2015-03-11

Review 4.  Mass media interventions for preventing smoking in young people.

Authors:  Kristin V Carson; Faisal Ameer; Kourosh Sayehmiri; Khin Hnin; Joseph Em van Agteren; Fatemeh Sayehmiri; Malcolm P Brinn; Adrian J Esterman; Anne B Chang; Brian J Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-02

5.  Screenomics: A Framework to Capture and Analyze Personal Life Experiences and the Ways that Technology Shapes Them.

Authors:  Byron Reeves; Nilam Ram; Thomas N Robinson; James J Cummings; C Lee Giles; Jennifer Pan; Agnese Chiatti; M J Cho; Katie Roehrick; Xiao Yang; Anupriya Gagneja; Miriam Brinberg; Daniel Muise; Yingdan Lu; Mufan Luo; Andrew Fitzgerald; Leo Yeykelis
Journal:  Hum Comput Interact       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.750

6.  Concurrent screen use and cross-sectional association with lifestyle behaviours and psychosocial health in adolescent females.

Authors:  Deirdre M Harrington; Ekaterini Ioannidou; Melanie J Davies; Charlotte L Edwardson; Trish Gorely; Alex V Rowlands; Lauren B Sherar; Amanda E Staiano
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Cognitive control in media multitaskers: Two replication studies and a meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wisnu Wiradhany; Mark R Nieuwenstein
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Accident risk associated with smartphone addiction: A study on university students in Korea.

Authors:  Hye-Jin Kim; Jin-Young Min; Hyun-Jin Kim; Kyoung-Bok Min
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 6.756

Review 9.  A Review of Evidence on the Role of Digital Technology in Shaping Attention and Cognitive Control in Children.

Authors:  Maria Vedechkina; Francesca Borgonovi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-24

10.  Media Multitasking: A Bibliometric Approach and Literature Review.

Authors:  Emma Beuckels; Guoquan Ye; Liselot Hudders; Veroline Cauberghe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.