Literature DB >> 19006461

Distractions, distractions: does instant messaging affect college students' performance on a concurrent reading comprehension task?

Annie Beth Fox1, Jonathan Rosen, Mary Crawford.   

Abstract

Instant messaging (IM) has become one of the most popular forms of computer-mediated communication (CMC) and is especially prevalent on college campuses. Previous research suggests that IM users often multitask while conversing online. To date, no one has yet examined the cognitive effect of concurrent IM use. Participants in the present study (N = 69) completed a reading comprehension task uninterrupted or while concurrently holding an IM conversation. Participants who IMed while performing the reading task took significantly longer to complete the task, indicating that concurrent IM use negatively affects efficiency. Concurrent IM use did not affect reading comprehension scores. Additional analyses revealed that the more time participants reported spending on IM, the lower their reading comprehension scores. Finally, we found that the more time participants reported spending on IM, the lower their self-reported GPA. Implications and future directions are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19006461     DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav        ISSN: 1094-9313


  13 in total

1.  Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration.

Authors:  Kelvin F H Lui; Alan C-N Wong
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

2.  Students' perceived stress and perception of barriers to effective study: impact on academic performance in examinations.

Authors:  J Turner; D Bartlett; M Andiappan; L Cabot
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Female College Students' Media Use and Academic Outcomes: Results from a Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Walsh; Robyn L Fielder; Kate B Carey; Michael P Carey
Journal:  Emerg Adulthood       Date:  2013-09-01

4.  Technology and interactive social media use among 8th and 10th graders in the U.S. and associations with homework and school grades.

Authors:  Sandra Tang; Megan E Patrick
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2018-04-14

5.  Media multitasking behavior: concurrent television and computer usage.

Authors:  S Adam Brasel; James Gips
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw       Date:  2011-03-07

6.  Volitional media multitasking: awareness of performance costs and modulation of media multitasking as a function of task demand.

Authors:  Brandon C W Ralph; Paul Seli; Kristin E Wilson; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-07-17

7.  Policy Recommendations for Preventing Problematic Internet Use in Schools: A Qualitative Study of Parental Perspectives.

Authors:  Melina A Throuvala; Mark D Griffiths; Mike Rennoldson; Daria J Kuss
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Smartphones and Cognition: A Review of Research Exploring the Links between Mobile Technology Habits and Cognitive Functioning.

Authors:  Henry H Wilmer; Lauren E Sherman; Jason M Chein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-25

Review 9.  A Review of Evidence on the Role of Digital Technology in Shaping Attention and Cognitive Control in Children.

Authors:  Maria Vedechkina; Francesca Borgonovi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-24

10.  The reciprocal relationships between social media self-control failure, mindfulness and wellbeing: A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jie Du; Peter Kerkhof; Guido M van Koningsbruggen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.