Literature DB >> 21380993

Mothers' satisfaction with planned vaginal and planned cesarean birth.

Joan L Blomquist1, Lieschen H Quiroz, Deborah Macmillan, Alexis McCullough, Victoria L Handa.   

Abstract

We sought to describe maternal satisfaction with childbirth among women planning either cesarean or vaginal birth. We enrolled primiparous women planning cesarean birth and a comparison group planning vaginal birth. After delivery, the maternal subjective experience was assessed with a visual analogue satisfaction scale and the Salmon questionnaire, with scale scores for these aspects of the maternal experience of birth: fulfillment, distress, and difficulty. The sample included 160 women planning vaginal birth and 44 women planning cesarean. Eight weeks postpartum, women planning cesarean reported higher satisfaction ratings ( P = 0.023), higher scores for fulfillment ( P = 0.017), lower scores for distress ( P = 0.010), and lower scores for difficulty ( P < 0.001). The least favorable scores were associated with unplanned cesarean ( N = 48). Women planning cesarean reported a more favorable birth experience than women planning vaginal birth, due in part to low satisfaction associated with unplanned cesarean. Maternal satisfaction with childbirth may be improved by efforts to reduce unplanned cesarean, but also by support for maternal-choice cesarean. © Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21380993      PMCID: PMC3086342          DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1274508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  20 in total

1.  Have women become more willing to accept obstetric interventions and does this relate to mode of birth? Data from a prospective study.

Authors:  Josephine M Green; Helen A Baston
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.689

2.  Memory of childbirth in the second year: the long-term effect of a negative birth experience and its modulation by the perceived intranatal relationship with caregivers.

Authors:  W Stadlmayr; F Amsler; S Lemola; S Stein; M Alt; D Bürgin; D Surbek; J Bitzer
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.949

3.  The emergence of high-tech birthing.

Authors:  Elaine Zwelling
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb

4.  Measurement of maternal perceptions of support and control in birth (SCIB).

Authors:  Elizabeth Ford; Susan Ayers; Daniel B Wright
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 5.  Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Fay Menacker; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.430

6.  Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy; S Katherine Laughon; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Helain J Landy; Judith U Hibbard; Shoshana Haberman; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Matthew K Hoffman; Kimberly D Gregory; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Christos G Hatjis; Paul van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Maternal expectations and experiences of labour pain and analgesia: a multicentre study of nulliparous women.

Authors:  G Capogna; S Alahuhtat; D Celleno; H De Vlieger; J Moreira; B Morgan; C Moore; P Pasqualetti; M Soetens; A Van Zundertl; J D Vertommen
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.603

8.  Cesarean section on maternal request: reasons for the request, self-estimated health, expectations, experience of birth and signs of depression among first-time mothers.

Authors:  Ingela Wiklund; Gunnar Edman; Ellika Andolf
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Perinatal factors related to negative or positive recall of birth experience in women 3 years postpartum in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Marlies Rijnders; Helen Baston; Yvonne Schönbeck; Karin van der Pal; Marianne Prins; Josephine Green; Simone Buitendijk
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.689

10.  Assessment of social psychological determinants of satisfaction with childbirth in a cross-national perspective.

Authors:  Wendy Christiaens; Piet Bracke
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  13 in total

1.  First-Time Mothers' Experiences of a Planned Cesarean Birth.

Authors:  Denise Puia
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2018

2.  Maternal goals for childbirth associated with planned vaginal and planned cesarean birth.

Authors:  Lieschen H Quiroz; Joan L Blomquist; Deborah Macmillan; Alexis McCullough; Victoria L Handa
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Maternal childbirth experience and induction of labour in each mode of delivery: a retrospective seven-year cohort study of 95,051 parturients in Finland.

Authors:  Johanna M Joensuu; Hannu Saarijärvi; Hanna Rouhe; Mika Gissler; Veli-Matti Ulander; Seppo Heinonen; Paulus Torkki; Tomi S Mikkola
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.105

4.  Mode of delivery and subsequent fertility.

Authors:  E C Evers; K C McDermott; J L Blomquist; V L Handa
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Maternal and paternal satisfaction in the delivery room: a cross-sectional comparative study.

Authors:  Marie-Noëlle Bélanger-Lévesque; Marilou Pasquier; Naomé Roy-Matton; Simon Blouin; Jean-Charles Pasquier
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Impact of mode of delivery on the birth experience in first-time mothers: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marie-Julia Guittier; Christine Cedraschi; Nasir Jamei; Michel Boulvain; Francis Guillemin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Indications for Emergency Intervention, Mode of Delivery, and the Childbirth Experience.

Authors:  Jonathan E Handelzalts; Avigail Waldman Peyser; Haim Krissi; Sigal Levy; Arnon Wiznitzer; Yoav Peled
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Client Satisfaction with Delivery Care Service and Associated Factors in the Public Health Facilities of Gamo Gofa Zone, Southwest Ethiopia: In a Resource Limited Setting.

Authors:  Rahel Tesfaye; Amare Worku; Wanzahun Godana; Bernt Lindtjorn
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2016-06-20

9.  Psychosocial factors that mediate the association between mode of birth and maternal postnatal adjustment: findings from a population-based survey.

Authors:  Fiona Alderdice; Jane Henderson; Charles Opondo; Marci Lobel; Maria Quigley; Maggie Redshaw
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Questionnaire survey on women's views after a first caesarean delivery in two tertiary centres in Ireland and their preference for involvement in a future randomised trial on mode of birth.

Authors:  Gillian Ryan; Kate C O Doherty; Declan Devane; Fionnuala McAuliffe; John Morrison
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.