Literature DB >> 25164023

Mode of delivery and subsequent fertility.

E C Evers1, K C McDermott2, J L Blomquist3, V L Handa4.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: When compared with vaginal delivery, is Cesarean delivery associated with reduced childbearing, a prolonged inter-birth interval or infertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: Women whose first delivery was by Cesarean section were not significantly different from those who delivered vaginally with respect to subsequent deliveries, inter-birth interval or infertility after delivery. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: Some studies have suggested that delivery by Cesarean section reduces subsequent fertility, while others have reported no association. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a planned secondary analysis of the Mothers' Outcomes After Delivery study, a longitudinal cohort study. This analysis included 956 women with 1835 deliveries, who completed a study questionnaire at 6-11 years (median [interquartile range]: 8.1 [7.1, 9.8]) after their first delivery. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Exclusion criteria regarding the first birth were: maternal age <15 or >50 years, delivery at <37 weeks gestation, placenta previa, multiple gestation, known fetal congenital abnormality, stillbirth, prior myomectomy and abruption. Of the 956 women included, the first delivery was by Cesarean section for 534 women and by vaginal birth for 422 women. Infertility was self-reported. To compare maternal characteristics by mode of first delivery, P-values were calculated using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's χ(2) test for categorical variables and a Kruskall-Wallis test for continuous variables. We also considered whether, across all deliveries to date, a prior Cesarean is associated with decreased fertility. In this analysis, self-reported infertility after each delivery (across all participants) was considered as a function of one or more prior Cesarean births, using generalized estimating equations to control for within-woman correlation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: No differences were observed between the Cesarean and vaginal groups (for first delivery) with respect to infertility after their most recent delivery (7 versus 6%, P = 0.597), the interval between their first and second births (30.8 versus 30.6 months, P = 0.872), or multiparity (75 versus 76%, P = 0.650). Across all births, a history of Cesarean delivery was not significantly associated with infertility (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.26). Women who reported infertility prior to their first delivery were significantly more likely to report infertility after each subsequent delivery (OR, 5.16; 95% CI, 3.60-7.39). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Due to the use of self-reported infertility, the fertility status of some participants may be misclassified. Also, the small sample size may result in insufficient power to detect small differences between groups. Finally, a relatively high proportion of our participants were over age 35 at the time of first delivery (26%) and highly educated (37% with graduate degrees), which may indicate that our population may not be generalizable. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: While some prior studies have shown decreased family size among women who deliver by Cesarean, our results suggest that the rate of infertility is not different after Cesarean compared with vaginal birth. Our findings should be reassuring to women who deliver by Cesarean section. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH, R01-HD056275). No competing interests are declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section; childbearing; fertility; inter-birth interval; reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25164023      PMCID: PMC4191449          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  24 in total

Review 1.  Does Caesarean section cause infertility?

Authors:  Maureen Porter; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Edwin van Teijlingen; Allan Templeton
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  The impact of cesarean birth on subsequent fertility.

Authors:  Engin Oral; Koray Elter
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  First cesarean birth and subsequent fertility.

Authors:  Gordon C S Smith; Angela M Wood; Jill P Pell; Richard Dobbie
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009.

Authors:  F Zegers-Hochschild; G D Adamson; J de Mouzon; O Ishihara; R Mansour; K Nygren; E Sullivan; S Vanderpoel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Pelvic muscle strength after childbirth.

Authors:  Sarah Friedman; Joan L Blomquist; Joann M Nugent; Kelly C McDermott; Alvaro Muñoz; Victoria L Handa
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Pregnancy after Caesarean section: fewer or later?

Authors:  J J H Eijsink; L van der Leeuw-Harmsen; P J Q van der Linden
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 7.  Impact of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  I Gurol-Urganci; S Bou-Antoun; C P Lim; D A Cromwell; T A Mahmood; A Templeton; J H van der Meulen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  First birth Caesarean section and subsequent fertility: a population-based study in the USA, 2000-2008.

Authors:  K H Kjerulff; J Zhu; C S Weisman; C V Ananth
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Mode of birth and women's psychological and physical wellbeing in the postnatal period.

Authors:  Ingrid J Rowlands; Maggie Redshaw
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Caesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancy interval: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sinéad M O'Neill; Patricia M Kearney; Louise C Kenny; Tine B Henriksen; Jennifer E Lutomski; Richard A Greene; Ali S Khashan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  6 in total

1.  The impact of Severe Maternal Morbidity on probability of subsequent birth in a population-based study of women in California from 1997-2017.

Authors:  Shalmali Bane; Suzan L Carmichael; Jonathan M Snowden; Can Liu; Audrey Lyndon; Elizabeth Wall-Wieler
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Brief Report: Cesarean Delivery and Subsequent Fecundability.

Authors:  Rose G Radin; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Kenneth J Rothman; Elizabeth E Hatch; Henrik T Sorensen; Anders H Riis; Wendy Kuohung; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Parameters in Canines After Cesarean Sections.

Authors:  Theresa Conze; Kathrin Büttner; Axel Wehrend
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-16

4.  Reduced pregnancy and live birth rates after in vitro fertilization in women with previous Caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  J Vissers; T C Sluckin; C C Repelaer van Driel-Delprat; R Schats; C J M Groot; C B Lambalk; J W R Twisk; J A F Huirne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Fertility intentions and the way they change following birth- a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Heidi Preis; Selen Tovim; Pnina Mor; Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky; Arnon Samueloff; Yael Benyamini
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Determinants associated with high-risk fertility behaviours among reproductive aged women in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Md Hasan Howlader; Harun Or Roshid; Satyajit Kundu; Henry Ratul Halder; Sanjoy Kumar Chanda; Md Ashfikur Rahman
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.223

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.