Literature DB >> 19200451

Intradermal hepatitis B vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laura Sangaré1, Lisa Manhart, Darin Zehrung, Chia C Wang.   

Abstract

To compare seroprotection achieved by intradermal versus intramuscular hepatitis B vaccine, we conducted a systematic review of observational studies and a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Meta-analysis of data from 757 adults demonstrated that intradermal hepatitis B vaccination was slightly (14%) less likely to achieve seroprotection than intramuscular vaccination (risk ratio(pooled) 0.86; 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.95). Diverse study methodologies detracted from our ability to synthesize data from these studies; standardized approaches would enhance comparability of future studies. Seroprotection from intradermal vaccination was higher among females and children, suggesting that these populations may be most appropriate for future intradermal vaccine development efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19200451     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  17 in total

1.  Poly[di(carboxylatophenoxy)phosphazene] is a potent adjuvant for intradermal immunization.

Authors:  Alexander K Andrianov; Daniel P DeCollibus; Helice A Gillis; Henry H Kha; Alexander Marin; Mark R Prausnitz; Lorne A Babiuk; Hugh Townsend; George Mutwiri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Intradermal delivery of vaccines: potential benefits and current challenges.

Authors:  J K Hickling; K R Jones; M Friede; D Zehrung; D Chen; D Kristensen
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 3.  Laser vaccine adjuvants. History, progress, and potential.

Authors:  Satoshi Kashiwagi; Timothy Brauns; Jeffrey Gelfand; Mark C Poznansky
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Intradermal vaccination using the novel microneedle device MicronJet600: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Yotam Levin; Efrat Kochba; Ivan Hung; Richard Kenney
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Immunogenicity, safety and tolerability of intradermal influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Ivan F N Hung; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Intradermal Synthetic DNA Vaccination Generates Leishmania-Specific T Cells in the Skin and Protection against Leishmania major.

Authors:  Lumena Louis; Megan Clark; Megan C Wise; Nelson Glennie; Andrea Wong; Kate Broderick; Jude Uzonna; David B Weiner; Phillip Scott
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Direct comparison of an inactivated subvirion influenza A virus subtype H5N1 vaccine administered by the intradermal and intramuscular routes.

Authors:  Shital M Patel; Robert L Atmar; Hana M El Sahly; Kuo Guo; Heather Hill; Wendy A Keitel
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Intramuscular vs intradermal route for hepatitis B booster vaccine in celiac children.

Authors:  Salvatore Leonardi; Andrea Domenico Praticò; Elena Lionetti; Massimo Spina; Giovanna Vitaliti; Mario La Rosa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Intradermal vaccination for infants and children.

Authors:  Akihiko Saitoh; Yuta Aizawa
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Hepatitis B virus: where do we stand and what is the next step for eradication?

Authors:  Haruki Komatsu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.