Literature DB >> 2137867

Perceptual identification, fragment completion, and free recall: concepts and data.

R R Hunt1, J P Toth.   

Abstract

The effects of orthographically distinctive and orthographically common words were compared on tests of free recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and lexical decision. Orthographic distinctiveness is argued to effect data-driven processing and, in light of recent theory, should have little effect upon free recall but substantial effects upon fragment completion and perceptual identification. The results showed superior recall and fragment completion of orthographically distinctive words but more accurate perceptual identification of orthographically common words. Latency of lexical decision was longer for orthographically distinctive than for orthographically common words. The visual complexity of orthographically distinctive words may require more extensive sensory processing than is possible within the temporal constraints of perceptual identification tests. The effect of orthographic distinctiveness upon free recall reveals a certain inadequacy in the notion of transfer-appropriate processing.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2137867     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.16.2.282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  14 in total

1.  Prospective memory: are preparatory attentional processes necessary for a single focal cue?

Authors:  Tyler L Harrison; Gilles O Einstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  The role of syllabic and orthographic properties of letter cues in solving word fragments.

Authors:  K Srinivas; H L Roediger; S Rajaram
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-05

3.  Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information.

Authors:  Daniel J Burns; Carin L Jenkins; Erica E Dean
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

4.  An investigation into the resource requirements of event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  Shayne Loft; Gillian Yeo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

5.  Is task interference in event-based prospective memory dependent on cue presentation?

Authors:  Shayne Loft; Rebecca Kearney; Roger Remington
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

6.  Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember.

Authors:  Anna-Lisa Cohen; Alexander Jaudas; Peter M Gollwitzer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

7.  On the relationship between reading, listening and speaking: it's different for people's names.

Authors:  T Valentine; J Hollis; V Moore
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

8.  Dissociative effects of orthographic distinctiveness in pure and mixed lists: an item-order account.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Michael Cahill; Julie M Bugg; Nathaniel G Meadow
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

9.  Does the isolation effect require attention?

Authors:  Tamra J Bireta; Colleen M Mazzei
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

10.  Priming on verbal perceptual tests: roles of lexical, surface, and conceptual processes.

Authors:  W Wippich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1995
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.