Literature DB >> 21378266

Self-renewal induced efficiently, safely, and effective therapeutically with one regulatable gene in a human somatic progenitor cell.

Kwang S Kim1, Hong J Lee, Han S Jeong, Jianxue Li, Yang D Teng, Richard L Sidman, Evan Y Snyder, Seung U Kim.   

Abstract

In the field of induced potency and fate reprogramming, it remains unclear what the best starting cell might be and to what extent a cell need be transported back to a more primitive state for translational purposes. Reprogramming a committed cell back to pluripotence to then instruct it toward a particular specialized cell type is demanding and may increase risks of neoplasia and undesired cell types. Precursor/progenitor cells from the organ of therapeutic concern typically lack only one critical attribute--the capacity for sustained self-renewal. We speculated that this could be induced in a regulatable manner such that cells proliferate only in vitro and differentiate in vivo without the need for promoting pluripotence or specifying lineage identity. As proof-of-concept, we generated and tested the efficiency, safety, engraftability, and therapeutic utility of "induced conditional self-renewing progenitor (ICSP) cells" derived from the human central nervous system (CNS); we conditionally induced self-renewal efficiently within neural progenitors solely by introducing v-myc tightly regulated by a tetracycline (Tet)-on gene expression system. Tet in the culture medium activated myc transcription and translation, allowing efficient expansion of homogeneous, clonal, karyotypically normal human CNS precursors ex vivo; in vivo, where Tet was absent, myc was not expressed, and self-renewal was entirely inactivated (as was tumorigenic potential). Cell proliferation ceased, and differentiation into electrophysiologically active neurons and other CNS cell types in vivo ensued upon transplantation into rats, both during development and after adult injury--with functional improvement and without neoplasia, overgrowth, deformation, emergence of non-neural cell types, phenotypic or genomic instability, or need for immunosuppression. This strategy of inducing self-renewal might be applied to progenitors from other organs and may prove to be a safe, effective, efficient, and practical method for optimizing insights gained from the ability to reprogram cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21378266      PMCID: PMC3064385          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1019743108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

Review 1.  Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches.

Authors:  Shinya Yamanaka; Helen M Blau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Pluripotency and cellular reprogramming: facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues.

Authors:  Jacob H Hanna; Krishanu Saha; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Why myc? An unexpected ingredient in the stem cell cocktail.

Authors:  Paul S Knoepfler
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 24.633

4.  c-Myc is dispensable for direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts.

Authors:  Marius Wernig; Alexander Meissner; John P Cassady; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Human neural stem cells genetically modified to overexpress brain-derived neurotrophic factor promote functional recovery and neuroprotection in a mouse stroke model.

Authors:  Hong J Lee; In J Lim; Min C Lee; Seung U Kim
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  N-myc is essential during neurogenesis for the rapid expansion of progenitor cell populations and the inhibition of neuronal differentiation.

Authors:  Paul S Knoepfler; Pei Feng Cheng; Robert N Eisenman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 7.  The cell cycle and Myc intersect with mechanisms that regulate pluripotency and reprogramming.

Authors:  Amar M Singh; Stephen Dalton
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 24.633

8.  Induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Holm Zaehres; Jeong Beom Kim; Hans R Schöler
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors.

Authors:  In-Hyun Park; Rui Zhao; Jason A West; Akiko Yabuuchi; Hongguang Huo; Tan A Ince; Paul H Lerou; M William Lensch; George Q Daley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Human neural stem cell transplantation promotes functional recovery in rats with experimental intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Sang-Wuk Jeong; Kon Chu; Keun-Hwa Jung; Seung U Kim; Manho Kim; Jae-Kyu Roh
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Gene therapy using stem cells.

Authors:  Erin R Burnight; Luke A Wiley; Robert F Mullins; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 2.  Modeling complex neuropsychiatric disorders with human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Brian T D Tobe; Evan Y Snyder; Jeffrey S Nye
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 5.547

3.  Establishment and Characterization of Immortalized Minipig Neural Stem Cell Line.

Authors:  Sung S Choi; Seung-Bin Yoon; Sang-Rae Lee; Sun-Uk Kim; Young Joo Cha; Daniel Lee; Seung U Kim; Kyu-Tae Chang; Hong J Lee
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Direct conversion of dermal fibroblasts into neural progenitor cells by a novel cocktail of defined factors.

Authors:  C Tian; R J Ambroz; L Sun; Y Wang; K Ma; Q Chen; B Zhu; J C Zheng
Journal:  Curr Mol Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.222

Review 5.  Concise review: self-renewal in the central nervous system: neural stem cells from embryo to adult.

Authors:  Lidia De Filippis; Elena Binda
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 6.940

6.  Human motor neurons generated from neural stem cells delay clinical onset and prolong life in ALS mouse model.

Authors:  Hong J Lee; Kwang S Kim; Jin Ahn; Hye M Bae; Inja Lim; Seung U Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Thrombospondin-1 signaling through CD47 inhibits self-renewal by regulating c-Myc and other stem cell transcription factors.

Authors:  Sukhbir Kaur; David R Soto-Pantoja; Erica V Stein; Chengyu Liu; Abdel G Elkahloun; Michael L Pendrak; Alina Nicolae; Satya P Singh; Zuqin Nie; David Levens; Jeffrey S Isenberg; David D Roberts
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Bioimaging of microRNA124a-independent neuronal differentiation of human G2 neural stem cells.

Authors:  Jonghwan Lee; Do Won Hwang; Seung U Kim; Dong Soo Lee; Yong Seung Lee; Hyejung Heo; Bahy A Ali; Abdulaziz A Al-Khedhairy; Soonhag Kim
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.693

9.  Selective Generation of Dopaminergic Precursors from Mouse Fibroblasts by Direct Lineage Conversion.

Authors:  Changhai Tian; Yuju Li; Yunlong Huang; Yongxiang Wang; Dapeng Chen; Jinxu Liu; Xiaobei Deng; Lijun Sun; Kristi Anderson; Xinrui Qi; Yulong Li; R Lee Mosley; Xiangmei Chen; Jian Huang; Jialin C Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Implications and limitations of cellular reprogramming for psychiatric drug development.

Authors:  Brian T D Tobe; Michael G Brandel; Jeffrey S Nye; Evan Y Snyder
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 8.718

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.