Literature DB >> 21377414

Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates the spinal plasticity induced with patterned electrical stimulation.

Toshiyuki Fujiwara1, Tetsuya Tsuji, Kaoru Honaga, Kimitaka Hase, Junichi Ushiba, Meigen Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patterned sensory electrical stimulation (PES) has been shown to induce plasticity in spinal reciprocal Ia inhibition of the calf muscles. To study the cortical modulation of spinal plasticity, we examined the effects of giving transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the motor cortex before PES.
METHODS: Seven healthy volunteers participated in this study. PES involved stimulating the left common peroneal nerve at the fibular head with a train of 10 pulses at 100 Hz every 1.5s for 20 min using an intensity equal to the motor threshold of the tibialis anterior. tDCS was applied for 10 min before PES. For anodal stimulation, the electrode was placed over the motor cortex, and the cathodal electrode over the contralateral supraorbital area. For cathodal stimulation, the electrodes were reversed. Reciprocal inhibition was assessed using a soleus H reflex conditioning-test paradigm.
RESULTS: PES increased disynaptic reciprocal inhibition from the peroneal nerve to the soleus H reflex. When cathodal tDCS was applied before PES, PES no longer increased reciprocal inhibition.
CONCLUSIONS: Applying tDCS before PES modulated the effects of PES on spinal reciprocal inhibition in a polarity specific manner. SIGNIFICANCE: We suggest that the motor cortex may play a role in spinal plasticity.
Copyright © 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21377414     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  11 in total

1.  Contribution of axonal orientation to pathway-dependent modulation of excitatory transmission by direct current stimulation in isolated rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Anatoli Y Kabakov; Paul A Muller; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Frances E Jensen; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effects of repetitive passive movement on ankle joint on spinal reciprocal inhibition.

Authors:  Ryo Hirabayashi; Mutsuaki Edama; Sho Kojima; Shota Miyaguchi; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The changes in spinal reciprocal inhibition during motor imagery in lower extremity.

Authors:  Hideto Nakayama; Michiyuki Kawakami; Yoko Takahashi; Kunitsugu Kondo; Eiji Shimizu
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Brain stimulation paired with novel locomotor training with robotic gait orthosis in chronic stroke: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Megan M Danzl; Kenneth C Chelette; Kara Lee; Dana Lykins; Lumy Sawaki
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.138

Review 5.  Hybrid Assistive Neuromuscular Dynamic Stimulation Therapy: A New Strategy for Improving Upper Extremity Function in Patients with Hemiparesis following Stroke.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Fujiwara; Michiyuki Kawakami; Kaoru Honaga; Michi Tochikura; Kaoru Abe
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  Change in Reciprocal Inhibition of the Forearm with Motor Imagery among Patients with Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Michiyuki Kawakami; Kohei Okuyama; Yoko Takahashi; Miho Hiramoto; Atsuko Nishimura; Junichi Ushiba; Toshiyuki Fujiwara; Meigen Liu
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Effects of Leg Motor Imagery Combined With Electrical Stimulation on Plasticity of Corticospinal Excitability and Spinal Reciprocal Inhibition.

Authors:  Yoko Takahashi; Michiyuki Kawakami; Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Yusuke Idogawa; Shigeo Tanabe; Kunitsugu Kondo; Meigen Liu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Enhances Recovery in Central Cord Syndrome Patients.

Authors:  Hana Choi; Kyung Cheon Seo; Tae Uk Kim; Seong Jae Lee; Jung Keun Hyun
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2019-02-28

9.  The effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and patterned electrical stimulation on spinal inhibitory interneurons and motor function in patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Toshiyuki Fujiwara; Yun-An Tsai; Shuen-Chang Tang; Michiyuki Kawakami; Katsuhiro Mizuno; Mitsuhiko Kodama; Yoshihisa Masakado; Meigen Liu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Priming With Intermittent Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Promotes Spinal Plasticity Induced by Peripheral Patterned Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Toshiyuki Fujiwara; Su-Chuan Lin; Yoko Takahashi; Kozo Hatori; Meigen Liu; Ying-Zu Huang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.