Literature DB >> 31728595

Effects of repetitive passive movement on ankle joint on spinal reciprocal inhibition.

Ryo Hirabayashi1, Mutsuaki Edama2, Sho Kojima2, Shota Miyaguchi2, Hideaki Onishi2.   

Abstract

Repetitive passive movement (RPM) activates afferent Ia fibers. The input of afferent Ia fibers from antagonist muscle may modulate the extent of spinal reciprocal inhibition (RI). However, effects of RPM on RI remain unknown. We aimed to clarify these effects in 20 healthy adults. Four RPM tasks (40°/s, 80°/s, 120°/s, and 160°/s), with the range of ankle joint movement set to 40°, ranging from 10° in dorsiflexion to 30° in plantar flexion, were performed for 10 min. For measuring RI, a deep peroneal nerve as a conditioning stimulus, tibial nerve as a test stimulus, and three condition-test stimulus intervals (CTIs; single, 2 ms, and 20 ms) were used. The stimulation frequency was 0.3 Hz for 36 times (3 stimulation conditions × 12 sets). RI was measured before, immediately after, and 5, 10, 15, and 20 min (Pre, Post 5, 10, 15, and 20, respectively) after the task. The extent of reciprocal Ia inhibition (CTI 2 ms) significantly increased in Post 5 and 10 at RPM speed of ≥ 120°/s. The extent of D1 inhibition (CTI 20 ms) significantly increased in Post 5 and 10 at RPM speed of ≥ 80°/s, and continued to increase until Post 15 at RPM speed of 160°/s. The extent of RI was the highest at RPM speed of 160°/s for both Ia and D1. Therefore, high RPM may increase the extent of reciprocal Ia inhibition and D1 inhibition, suggesting that rapid movements affect RI by increasing the firing frequency from the muscle spindle to afferent Ia fibers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrical stimulation; Electromyograph; H-reflex; Joint movement; M wave

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31728595     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05689-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  47 in total

1.  Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  K Stefan; E Kunesch; L G Cohen; R Benecke; J Classen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Reciprocal inhibition in hemiplegic patients--a longitudinal study.

Authors:  C Crone; L L Johnsen; J Nielsen
Journal:  Suppl Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates the spinal plasticity induced with patterned electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Fujiwara; Tetsuya Tsuji; Kaoru Honaga; Kimitaka Hase; Junichi Ushiba; Meigen Liu
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Reciprocal group I inhibition on triceps surae motoneurons in man.

Authors:  Y Mizuno; R Tanaka; N Yanagisawa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Changes in transmission across synapses of Ia afferents in spastic patients.

Authors:  J Nielsen; N Petersen; C Crone
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  The effects of patterned electrical stimulation combined with voluntary contraction on spinal reciprocal inhibition in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Yoko Takahashi; Toshiyuki Fujiwara; Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Michiyuki Kawakami; Katsuhiro Mizuno; Meigen Liu
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  A comparative study of methods for estimation of presynaptic inhibition.

Authors:  I Milanov
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Event-related potentials elicited by passive movements in humans: characterization, source analysis, and comparison to fMRI.

Authors:  F Alary; B Doyon; I Loubinoux; C Carel; K Boulanouar; J P Ranjeva; P Celsis; F Chollet
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Disorder in reciprocal innervation upon initiation of voluntary movement in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  A Hayashi; Y Kagamihara; Y Nakajima; H Narabayashi; Y Okuma; R Tanaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Neuromagnetic activation following active and passive finger movements.

Authors:  Hideaki Onishi; Kazuhiro Sugawara; Koya Yamashiro; Daisuke Sato; Makoto Suzuki; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Hiroatsu Murakami; Shigeki Kameyama
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.