Literature DB >> 21375894

NICE guidance on long-term sickness and incapacity.

Mark Gabbay1, Lorraine Taylor, Linda Sheppard, Jim Hillage, Clare Bambra, Fiona Ford, Richard Preece, Nichole Taske, Michael P Kelly.   

Abstract

Long-term sickness absence and incapacity benefits (disability pension) rates have increased across industrialised countries. Effective measures are needed to support return to work. The recommendations of this guidance were informed by the most appropriate available evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Public health evidence was provided by research using a variety of study designs that attempted to determine the outcome of a particular intervention by evaluating status before and after the intervention had been effected, and was not limited to randomised control trials. Where the evidence base was depleted or underdeveloped, expert witnesses were called to give their opinion on the best available evidence and emerging interventions. The process enabled challenge and contestability from stakeholder groups at different points as the guidance was developed. Forty-five heterogeneous studies were included in the review of interventions to reduce long-term sickness absence and transitions from short-term to long-term absence (mainly covering the former and also mainly examining musculoskeletal conditions). The analysis of evidence was restricted to descriptive synthesis. Three general themes emerged from an analysis of the studies that were more likely to report positive results: early interventions; multidisciplinary approaches; and interventions with a workplace component. Two further reviews were undertaken, one on interventions to reduce the re-occurrence of sickness absence, which identified seven studies on lower back pain, and concluded that early intervention and direct workplace input are important factors. The final evidence review focused on six studies of interventions for those in receipt of incapacity benefit. The evidence was that work-focused interviews coupled with access to tailored support are effective and cost-effective interventions. Practitioners should consider the impact of interventions and management options on work ability for patients of working age. Work ability should be considered a key outcome for future intervention studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21375894      PMCID: PMC3047344          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X561221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  8 in total

Review 1.  Occupational health services in the UK--challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  P J Nicholson
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 2.  Evidence based public health: A review of the experience of the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) of developing public health guidance in England.

Authors:  Michael Kelly; Antony Morgan; Simon Ellis; Tricia Younger; Jane Huntley; Catherine Swann
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Predictors for outcome of a multi-modal cognitive behavioural treatment program for low back pain patients-a 12-month follow-up study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 4.  Environmental and societal influences acting on cardiovascular risk factors and disease at a population level: a review.

Authors:  Clara Kayei Chow; Karen Lock; Koon Teo; S V Subramanian; Martin McKee; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Mental health as a reason for claiming incapacity benefit--a comparison of national and local trends.

Authors:  Judith Brown; Phil Hanlon; Ivan Turok; David Webster; James Arnott; Ewan B Macdonald
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.341

6.  Electronic fit notes: sickness certification in the new decade.

Authors:  Mark B Gabbay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Distribution of sickness absence in the European Union countries.

Authors:  D Gimeno; F G Benavides; J Benach; B C Amick
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Patient factors associated with duration of certified sickness absence and transition to long-term incapacity.

Authors:  Chris Shiels; Mark B Gabbay; Fiona Mary Ford
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.386

  8 in total
  27 in total

1.  The Management of Long-Term Sickness Absence in Large Public Sector Healthcare Organisations: A Realist Evaluation Using Mixed Methods.

Authors:  Angela Higgins; Peter O'Halloran; Sam Porter
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-09

2.  Intervention policies and social security in case of reduced working capacity in the Netherlands, Finland and Germany: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Oskar Mittag; Toomas Kotkas; Christina Reese; Hanna Kampling; Henning Groskreutz; Wouter de Boer; Felix Welti
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Self-certification versus physician certification of sick leave for reducing sickness absence and associated costs.

Authors:  Johanna Kausto; Jos H Verbeek; Jani H Ruotsalainen; Jaana I Halonen; Lauri J Virta; Eila Kankaanpää
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-14

4.  Predicting disability retirement among Abu Dhabi police using multiple measure of sickness absence.

Authors:  Faisal Almurbahani Alkaabi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.135

5.  Primary healthcare professionals' experiences of the sick leave process: a focus group study in Sweden.

Authors:  Emma Nilsing; Elsy Söderberg; Carina Berterö; Birgitta Öberg
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-09

6.  Prognostic factors for return to work, sickness benefits, and transitions between these states: a 4-year follow-up after work-related rehabilitation.

Authors:  Irene Oyeflaten; Stein Atle Lie; Camilla M Ihlebæk; Hege R Eriksen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

Review 7.  Effectiveness of very early workplace interventions to reduce sickness absence: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sergio Vargas-Prada; Evangelia Demou; Drushca Lalloo; Ione Avila-Palencia; Kaveh A Sanati; Maite Sampere; Kerry Freer; Consol Serra; Ewan B Macdonald
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.024

8.  "A powerful intervention: general practitioners'; use of sickness certification in depression".

Authors:  Sara Macdonald; Margaret Maxwell; Philip Wilson; Michael Smith; Will Whittaker; Matt Sutton; Jill Morrison
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Early coordinated multidisciplinary intervention to prevent sickness absence and labour market exclusion in patients with low back pain: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Annette Fisker; Henning Langberg; Tom Petersen; Ole Steen Mortensen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Psychosocial Risk Factors, Interventions, and Comorbidity in Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain in Primary Care: Need for Comprehensive and Patient-Centered Care.

Authors:  Aline Ramond-Roquin; Céline Bouton; Cyril Bègue; Audrey Petit; Yves Roquelaure; Jean-François Huez
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.