Literature DB >> 10700325

Predictors for outcome of a multi-modal cognitive behavioural treatment program for low back pain patients-a 12-month follow-up study.

.   

Abstract

Low back pain patients (n=142) on sick leave for at least 8 weeks were given a multi-modal cognitive behavioural treatment program (MMCBT) that lasted for 4 weeks. Before treatment, all patients were tested with a comprehensive test battery. The outcome at 12-month follow-up was predictable from the pretest, but only when combining medical and psychological data. Patients who returned to work (Returners, 50%) in the MMCBT group were characterised by less pain, more psychological strength, were evaluated by the physiotherapist as having a good prognosis for return to work, and were less educated. Patients who did not return to work (Non-returners) in the MMCBT group felt tense and unfit, felt hopelessness concerning the future, were less physically active, thought their complaints would worsen if they continued working, and reported fewer difficulties driving a car. Returners to work (58%) in the randomised control group (n=81), who received ordinary physical therapy, were characterised by high levels of energy, less subjective health complaints, less exhaustion for a condition test, and did not work in positions giving a constant load on the back. There was no significant differences between number of patients who had returned to work in the MMCBT and the control group. Non-returners in the control group lacked energy, trained less regularly, worked in occupations that gave an almost constant load on the back, and did not expect to be back to work in the course of a couple of weeks. It seems to be important to develop further diagnostic tools to identify those who might benefit from extensive or specific treatments. Copyright 1998 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 10700325     DOI: 10.1016/s1090-3801(98)90028-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  10 in total

1.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

Review 2.  Comparison of risk factors predicting return to work between patients with subacute and chronic non-specific low back pain: systematic review.

Authors:  C A M Heitz; R Hilfiker; L M Bachmann; H Joronen; T Lorenz; D Uebelhart; A Klipstein; Florian Brunner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  NICE guidance on long-term sickness and incapacity.

Authors:  Mark Gabbay; Lorraine Taylor; Linda Sheppard; Jim Hillage; Clare Bambra; Fiona Ford; Richard Preece; Nichole Taske; Michael P Kelly
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Effectiveness of community- and workplace-based interventions to manage musculoskeletal-related sickness absence and job loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  Keith T Palmer; Elizabeth C Harris; Cathy Linaker; Mary Barker; Wendy Lawrence; Cyrus Cooper; David Coggon
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Age as a predicting factor in the therapy outcome of multidisciplinary treatment of patients with chronic low back pain--a prospective longitudinal clinical study in 405 patients.

Authors:  Matthias Buchner; Eva Neubauer; Anita Zahlten-Hinguranage; Marcus Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Protocol for the Cognitive Interventions and Nutritional Supplements (CINS) trial: a randomized controlled multicenter trial of a brief intervention (BI) versus a BI plus cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) versus nutritional supplements for patients with long-lasting muscle and back pain.

Authors:  Silje E Reme; Torill H Tveito; Trudie Chalder; Tormod Bjørkkjaer; Aage Indahl; Jens I Brox; Egil Fors; Eli M Hagen; Hege R Eriksen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  What facilitates return to work? Patients' experiences 3 years after occupational rehabilitation.

Authors:  Liv Haugli; Silje Maeland; Liv H Magnussen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-12

Review 8.  A Systematic Search and Review of Questionnaires Measuring Individual psychosocial Factors Predicting Return to Work After Musculoskeletal and Common Mental Disorders.

Authors:  Andrea Gragnano; Patrizia Villotti; Christian Larivière; Alessia Negrini; Marc Corbière
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2020-12-23

9.  Designing a workplace return-to-work program for occupational low back pain: an intervention mapping approach.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia; David Cassidy; Ivan Steensta; Sophie Soklaridis; Eleanor Boyle; Stephanie Eng; Hamer Howard; Bains Bhupinder; Pierre Côté
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Expectations, perceptions, and physiotherapy predict prolonged sick leave in subacute low back pain.

Authors:  Silje E Reme; Eli M Hagen; Hege R Eriksen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.