Literature DB >> 21375306

Significant enhancement of docking sensitivity using implicit ligand sampling.

Mengang Xu1, Markus A Lill.   

Abstract

The efficient and accurate quantification of protein-ligand interactions using computational methods is still a challenging task. Two factors strongly contribute to the failure of docking methods to predict free energies of binding accurately: the insufficient incorporation of protein flexibility coupled to ligand binding and the neglected dynamics of the protein-ligand complex in current scoring schemes. We have developed a new methodology, named the 'ligand-model' concept, to sample protein conformations that are relevant for binding structurally diverse sets of ligands. In the ligand-model concept, molecular-dynamics (MD) simulations are performed with a virtual ligand, represented by a collection of functional groups that binds to the protein and dynamically changes its shape and properties during the simulation. The ligand model essentially represents a large ensemble of different chemical species binding to the same target protein. Representative protein structures were obtained from the MD simulation, and docking was performed into this ensemble of protein conformation. Similar binding poses were clustered, and the averaged score was utilized to rerank the poses. We demonstrate that the ligand-model approach yields significant improvements in predicting native-like binding poses and quantifying binding affinities compared to static docking and ensemble docking simulations into protein structures generated from an apo MD simulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21375306      PMCID: PMC3172320          DOI: 10.1021/ci100457t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  57 in total

1.  Protein flexibility and dynamics using constraint theory.

Authors:  M F Thorpe; M Lei; A J Rader; D J Jacobs; L A Kuhn
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.518

2.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Philippe Ferrara; Holger Gohlke; Daniel J Price; Gerhard Klebe; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Modeling correlated main-chain motions in proteins for flexible molecular recognition.

Authors:  Maria I Zavodszky; Ming Lei; M F Thorpe; Anthony R Day; Leslie A Kuhn
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-11-01

4.  A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; David L Pincus; Chaya S Rapp; Tyler J F Day; Barry Honig; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

5.  Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening.

Authors:  Anna Maria Ferrari; Binqing Q Wei; Luca Costantino; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Xun Li; Yan Li; Zhihai Liu; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  J Aqvist; C Medina; J E Samuelsson
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-03

Review 8.  Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function.

Authors:  Ivet Bahar; Timothy R Lezon; Lee-Wei Yang; Eran Eyal
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.981

9.  Studying enzyme binding specificity in acetylcholinesterase using a combined molecular dynamics and multiple docking approach.

Authors:  Jeremy Kua; Yingkai Zhang; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  6 in total

1.  Utilizing experimental data for reducing ensemble size in flexible-protein docking.

Authors:  Mengang Xu; Markus A Lill
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 2.  Efficient incorporation of protein flexibility and dynamics into molecular docking simulations.

Authors:  Markus A Lill
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 3.  Induced fit docking, and the use of QM/MM methods in docking.

Authors:  Mengang Xu; Markus A Lill
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Technol       Date:  2013-09

4.  Protein pharmacophore selection using hydration-site analysis.

Authors:  Bingjie Hu; Markus A Lill
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Efficiency of Stratification for Ensemble Docking Using Reduced Ensembles.

Authors:  Bing Xie; John D Clark; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  PharmDock: a pharmacophore-based docking program.

Authors:  Bingjie Hu; Markus A Lill
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.514

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.