Literature DB >> 33675001

Repetition blindness for words and pictures: A failure to form stable type representations?

Irina M Harris1, William G Hayward2, Manuel S Seet3, Sally Andrews4.   

Abstract

Repetition blindness (RB) is the failure to detect and report a repeated item during rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). The RB literature reveals consistent and robust RB for word stimuli, but somewhat variable RB effects for pictorial stimuli. We directly compared RB for object pictures and their word labels, using exactly the same procedure in the same participants. Experiment 1 used a large pool of stimuli that only occurred once during the experiment and found significant RB for words, but significant repetition facilitation for pictures. These differential repetition effects were replicated when the task required participants to only report the last item of the stream. Experiment 2 used a small pool of stimuli presented several times throughout the experiment. Significant RB was found for both words and pictures, although it was more pronounced for words. These findings present a challenge to the token individuation hypothesis (Kanwisher, Cognition, 27, 117-143, 1987) and suggest that RB is more likely to be due to a difficulty in establishing a robust type representation. We propose that an experimental context that contains high levels of overlap in visual features (e.g., letters in the case of words, visual fragments in the case of repeatedly presented pictures) may prevent the formation of distinct object-level episodic representations, resulting in RB.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Object tokens; Repetition blindness; Stimulus format; Types

Year:  2021        PMID: 33675001     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-021-01146-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  19 in total

1.  Priming from distractors in rapid serial visual presentation is modulated by image properties and attention.

Authors:  Irina M Harris; Claire T Benito; Paul E Dux
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Visual recognition: as soon as you know it is there, you know what it is.

Authors:  Kalanit Grill-Spector; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-02

3.  Turning objects on their heads: the influence of the stored axis on object individuation.

Authors:  Irina M Harris; Paul E Dux
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-08

4.  Repetition blindness for rotated objects.

Authors:  William G Hayward; Guomei Zhou; Wai-Fung Man; Irina M Harris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation.

Authors:  N G Kanwisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-11

6.  Repetition blindness reveals differences between the representations of manipulable and nonmanipulable objects.

Authors:  Irina M Harris; Alexandra M Murray; William G Hayward; Claire O'Callaghan; Sally Andrews
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Repetition blindness: perception or memory failure?

Authors:  C Fagot; H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Repetition blindness between visually different items: the case of pictures and words.

Authors:  D Bavelier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994-03

9.  Repetition blindness occurs in nonwords.

Authors:  Catherine L Harris; Alison L Morris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Orientation sensitivity at different stages of object processing: evidence from repetition priming and naming.

Authors:  Irina M Harris; Paul E Dux; Claire T Benito; E Charles Leek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.