Literature DB >> 21374079

Visual-haptic cue integration with spatial and temporal disparity during pointing movements.

Sascha Serwe1, Konrad P Körding, Julia Trommershäuser.   

Abstract

Many perceptual cue combination studies have shown that humans can integrate sensory information across modalities as well as within a modality in a manner that is close to optimal. While the limits of sensory cue integration have been extensively studied in the context of perceptual decision tasks, the evidence obtained in the context of motor decisions provides a less consistent picture. Here, we studied the combination of visual and haptic information in the context of human arm movement control. We implemented a pointing task in which human subjects pointed at an invisible unknown target position whose vertical position varied randomly across trials. In each trial, we presented a haptic and a visual cue that provided noisy information about the target position half-way through the reach. We measured pointing accuracy as function of haptic and visual cue onset and compared pointing performance to the predictions of a multisensory decision model. Our model accounts for pointing performance by computing the maximum a posteriori estimate, assuming minimum variance combination of uncertain sensory cues. Synchronicity of cue onset has previously been demonstrated to facilitate the integration of sensory information. We tested this in trials in which visual and haptic information was presented with temporal disparity. We found that for our sensorimotor task temporal disparity between visual and haptic cue had no effect. Sensorimotor learning appears to use all available information and to apply the same near-optimal rules for cue combination that are used by perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21374079      PMCID: PMC3400546          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2603-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  52 in total

1.  System identification applied to a visuomotor task: near-optimal human performance in a noisy changing task.

Authors:  R J Baddeley; H A Ingram; R C Miall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Jeffrey M Beck; Peter E Latham; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Automatic adjustment of visuomotor readiness.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Target selection in visual search as revealed by movement trajectories.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant?

Authors:  David C Knill; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Detection of temporal delays in visual-haptic interfaces.

Authors:  Ingrid M L C Vogels
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.888

10.  Judging surface slant for placing objects: a role for motion parallax.

Authors:  Stefan Louw; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  4 in total

1.  Time gain influences adaptive visual-motor isometric force control.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Molly M Mazich; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Dynamic weighting of multisensory stimuli shapes decision-making in rats and humans.

Authors:  John P Sheppard; David Raposo; Anne K Churchland
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Trust in haptic assistance: weighting visual and haptic cues based on error history.

Authors:  Tricia L Gibo; Winfred Mugge; David A Abbink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.