PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles when one or two blastocysts are transferred. METHODS: Retrospective chart review RESULTS: Two hundred forty-three frozen blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles were analyzed. Clinical pregnancy rate (50.4% vs. 34.7%), live birth rate (45.8% vs. 30.6%), and twin live birth rate (19.3% vs. 0) were significantly higher in the double versus single FBT group, respectively (p < 0.05). Prior fresh cycle success with same-cohort embryos did not predict outcome of FBT cycle. When the fresh cycle was unsuccessful, there still was a significant increase in twinning when two frozen-thawed blastocysts were transferred. CONCLUSIONS: Transferring two blastocysts during an FBT cycle resulted in higher live birth and twin live birth rates. Single FBT provided acceptable pregnancy rates for couples seeking to avoid a multiple pregnancy or for those having a single blastocyst stored. Interestingly, the outcome of fresh cycle with same-cohort embryos did not influence the outcome of frozen-thawed cycle.
PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles when one or two blastocysts are transferred. METHODS: Retrospective chart review RESULTS: Two hundred forty-three frozen blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles were analyzed. Clinical pregnancy rate (50.4% vs. 34.7%), live birth rate (45.8% vs. 30.6%), and twin live birth rate (19.3% vs. 0) were significantly higher in the double versus single FBT group, respectively (p < 0.05). Prior fresh cycle success with same-cohort embryos did not predict outcome of FBT cycle. When the fresh cycle was unsuccessful, there still was a significant increase in twinning when two frozen-thawed blastocysts were transferred. CONCLUSIONS: Transferring two blastocysts during an FBT cycle resulted in higher live birth and twin live birth rates. Single FBT provided acceptable pregnancy rates for couples seeking to avoid a multiple pregnancy or for those having a single blastocyst stored. Interestingly, the outcome of fresh cycle with same-cohort embryos did not influence the outcome of frozen-thawed cycle.
Authors: Ann Thurin; Jon Hausken; Torbjörn Hillensjö; Barbara Jablonowska; Anja Pinborg; Annika Strandell; Christina Bergh Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Inna Berin; Lawrence L Engmann; Claudio A Benadiva; David W Schmidt; John C Nulsen; Donald B Maier Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2009-03-26 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Kate Devine; Matthew T Connell; Kevin S Richter; Christina I Ramirez; Eric D Levens; Alan H DeCherney; Robert J Stillman; Eric A Widra Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Melanie R Freeman; M Shaun Hinds; Kay G Howard; Julie M Howard; George A Hill Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Eden R Cardozo; Alexcis P Thomson; Anatte E Karmon; Kristy A Dickinson; Diane L Wright; Mary E Sabatini Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2015-01-18 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Sang Min Kang; Sang Won Lee; San Hyun Yoon; Joo Cheol Kim; Jin Ho Lim; Seong Goo Lee Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2013-05-30 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Jin Hee Eum; Jae Kyun Park; So Young Kim; Soo Kyung Paek; Hyun Ha Seok; Eun Mi Chang; Dong Ryul Lee; Woo Sik Lee Journal: Clin Exp Reprod Med Date: 2016-09-22