Literature DB >> 19324343

Transfer of two versus three embryos in women less than 40 years old undergoing frozen transfer cycles.

Inna Berin1, Lawrence L Engmann, Claudio A Benadiva, David W Schmidt, John C Nulsen, Donald B Maier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles when two or three embryos were transferred in women aged <40 years.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: A university-affiliated IVF program. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing FET cycles between January 2004 and December 2005. INTERVENTION(S): Transfer of two or three embryos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate (PR), multiple pregnancy rate (MPR), and live birth rate (LBR). RESULT(S): In patients aged <35 (n = 145), two versus three embryo group had similar PR and LBR, but the MPR was significantly higher in the three-embryo group (41% for three embryos vs. 9.4% for two embryos). Clinical pregnancy in the fresh cycle from which the frozen embryos were obtained did not affect the PR, and an increase in MPR was still observed. In patients aged 35 to 39 (n = 93), there were no differences in the PR, MPR, or LBR between the two groups. CONCLUSION(S): Transfer of two instead of three frozen embryos in patients <35 years old resulted in a significant decrease in MPR without compromising PR or LBR. Transferring additional embryos when a patient had an unsuccessful fresh cycle was not warranted. In the age group 35-39 years, transferring two instead of three embryos did not decrease PR or LBR, and had no effect on the risk of high-order multiples. Copyright 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19324343     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

1.  Pregnancy rates for single embryo transfer (SET) of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts after cryopreservation by vitrification and slow freeze.

Authors:  Leah Kaye; Erica Anspach Will; Alison Bartolucci; John Nulsen; Claudio Benadiva; Lawrence Engmann
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Outcome Analysis of Day-3 Frozen Embryo Transfer v/s Fresh Embryo Transfer in Infertility: A Prospective Therapeutic Study in Indian Scenario.

Authors:  Neha Palo Chandel; Vidya V Bhat; B S Bhat; Sidharth S Chandel
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-05-22

3.  Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: clinical outcomes of single and double blastocyst transfers.

Authors:  Inna Berin; Sarah T McLellan; Eric A Macklin; Thomas L Toth; Diane L Wright
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles in China: clinical outcomes of two and three multicellular embryos transfers.

Authors:  Yijuan Sun; Yun Feng; Aijun Zhang; Xiaowei Lu; Zhihong Niu; Ruihuan Gu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Specialists' Attitude toward Appropriate Number of Transferable Embryos in Assisted Reproductive Technology in Iran.

Authors:  Zohreh Behjati Ardakani; Malihe Zaman Momeniha; Fereshteh Azedi; Kourosh Kamali; Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2011-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.