Literature DB >> 21371810

HIFU-induced cavitation and heating in ex vivo porcine subcutaneous fat.

Zoe Kyriakou1, Marc Ignasi Corral-Baques, Albert Amat, Constantin-C Coussios.   

Abstract

The present study is motivated by the fact that there are no published studies quantifying cavitation activity and heating induced by ultrasound in adipose tissue and that there are currently no reliable techniques for monitoring successful deposition of ultrasound energy in fat in real time. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) exposures were performed in excised porcine fat at four different frequencies (0.5, 1.1, 1.6 and 3.4 MHz) over a range of pressure amplitudes and exposure durations. The transmission losses arising from reflection at the skin interface and attenuation through skin and fat were quantified at all frequencies using an embedded needle hydrophone. A 15 MHz passive cavitation detector (PCD) coaxial to the HIFU transducer was used to capture acoustic emissions emanating from the focus during HIFU exposures, while the focal temperature rise was measured using minimally invasive needle thermocouples. Repeatable temperature rises in excess of 10°C could be readily instigated across all four frequencies for acoustic intensities (Ispta) in excess of 50 W/cm(2) within the first 2 s of exposure. Even though cavitation could not be initiated at 1.1, 1.6 and 3.4 MHz over the in situ peak rarefactional (p(-)) pressure range 0-3 MPa explored in the present study, inertial cavitation activity was always initiated at 0.5 MHz for pressures greater than 1.6 MPa (p(-)) and was found to enhance focal heat deposition. A good correlation was identified between the energy of broadband emissions detected by the PCD and the focal temperature rise at 0.5 MHz, particularly for short 2 s exposures, which could be exploited as a tool for noninvasive monitoring of successful treatment delivery.
Copyright © 2011 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21371810     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  12 in total

Review 1.  MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery in musculoskeletal diseases: the hot topics.

Authors:  Alberto Bazzocchi; Alessandro Napoli; Beatrice Sacconi; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Carlo Catalano; Ugo Albisinni
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Phase-shift perfluorocarbon agents enhance high intensity focused ultrasound thermal delivery with reduced near-field heating.

Authors:  Linsey C Phillips; Connor Puett; Paul S Sheeran; G Wilson Miller; Terry O Matsunaga; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Focused Ultrasound for Neuromodulation.

Authors:  David P Darrow
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Passive cavitation detection during pulsed HIFU exposures of ex vivo tissues and in vivo mouse pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  Tong Li; Hong Chen; Tatiana Khokhlova; Yak-Nam Wang; Wayne Kreider; Xuemei He; Joo Ha Hwang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Effects of Temperature on the Histotripsy Intrinsic Threshold for Cavitation.

Authors:  Eli Vlaisavljevich; Zhen Xu; Adam Maxwell; Lauren Mancia; Xi Zhang; Kuang-Wei Lin; Alexander Duryea; Jonathan Sukovich; Tim Hall; Eric Johnsen; Charles Cain
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Probability of cavitation for single ultrasound pulses applied to tissues and tissue-mimicking materials.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Charles A Cain; Timothy L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Effects of ultrasound frequency and tissue stiffness on the histotripsy intrinsic threshold for cavitation.

Authors:  Eli Vlaisavljevich; Kuang-Wei Lin; Adam Maxwell; Matthew T Warnez; Lauren Mancia; Rahul Singh; Andrew J Putnam; Brian Fowlkes; Eric Johnsen; Charles Cain; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Cavitation-enhanced MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation of rabbit tumors in vivo using phase shift nanoemulsions.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kopechek; Eun-Joo Park; Yong-Zhi Zhang; Natalia I Vykhodtseva; Nathan J McDannold; Tyrone M Porter
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  The impact of vaporized nanoemulsions on ultrasound-mediated ablation.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Jonathan A Kopechek; Tyrone M Porter
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2013-04-25

Review 10.  Improving the performance of phase-change perfluorocarbon droplets for medical ultrasonography: current progress, challenges, and prospects.

Authors:  Paul S Sheeran; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2014-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.