Literature DB >> 24613635

Passive cavitation detection during pulsed HIFU exposures of ex vivo tissues and in vivo mouse pancreatic tumors.

Tong Li1, Hong Chen2, Tatiana Khokhlova3, Yak-Nam Wang2, Wayne Kreider2, Xuemei He4, Joo Ha Hwang3.   

Abstract

Pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound (pHIFU) has been shown to enhance vascular permeability, disrupt tumor barriers and enhance drug penetration into tumor tissue through acoustic cavitation. Monitoring of cavitation activity during pHIFU treatments and knowing the ultrasound pressure levels sufficient to reliably induce cavitation in a given tissue are therefore very important. Here, three metrics of cavitation activity induced by pHIFU and evaluated by confocal passive cavitation detection were introduced: cavitation probability, cavitation persistence and the level of the broadband acoustic emissions. These metrics were used to characterize cavitation activity in several ex vivo tissue types (bovine tongue and liver and porcine adipose tissue and kidney) and gel phantoms (polyacrylamide and agarose) at varying peak-rare factional focal pressures (1-12 MPa) during the following pHIFU protocol: frequency 1.1 MHz, pulse duration 1 ms and pulse repetition frequency 1 Hz. To evaluate the relevance of the measurements in ex vivo tissue, cavitation metrics were also investigated and compared in the ex vivo and in vivo murine pancreatic tumors that develop spontaneously in transgenic KrasLSL.G12 D/+; p53 R172 H/+; PdxCretg/+ (KPC) mice and closely re-capitulate human disease in their morphology. The cavitation threshold, defined at 50% cavitation probability, was found to vary broadly among the investigated tissues (within 2.5-10 MPa), depending mostly on the water-lipid ratio that characterizes the tissue composition. Cavitation persistence and the intensity of broadband emissions depended both on tissue structure and lipid concentration. Both the cavitation threshold and broadband noise emission level were similar between ex vivo and in vivo pancreatic tumor tissue. The largest difference between in vivo and ex vivo settings was found in the pattern of cavitation occurrence throughout pHIFU exposure: it was sporadic in vivo, but it decreased rapidly and stopped over the first few pulses ex vivo. Cavitation activity depended on the interplay between the destruction and circulation of cavitation nuclei, which are not only used up by HIFU treatment but also replenished or carried away by circulation in vivo. These findings are important for treatment planning and optimization in pHIFU-induced drug delivery, in particular for pancreatic tumors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cavitation; Drug delivery; Pancreatic cancer; Passive cavitation detection; Pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound; pHIFU

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24613635      PMCID: PMC4048799          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  30 in total

1.  Controlled tissue emulsification produced by high intensity focused ultrasound shock waves and millisecond boiling.

Authors:  Tatiana D Khokhlova; Michael S Canney; Vera A Khokhlova; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Lawrence A Crum; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  In vivo bubble nucleation probability in sheep brain tissue.

Authors:  J Gateau; J-F Aubry; D Chauvet; A-L Boch; M Fink; M Tanter
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Comparison of the lipid content and fatty acid composition of intermuscular and subcutaneous adipose tissues in pig carcasses.

Authors:  M Monziols; M Bonneau; A Davenel; M Kouba
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  A tissue phantom for visualization and measurement of ultrasound-induced cavitation damage.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Tzu-Yin Wang; Lingqian Yuan; Alexander P Duryea; Zhen Xu; Charles A Cain
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers.

Authors:  J A Jensen; N B Svendsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of boiling induced by high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Tatiana D Khokhlova; Michael S Canney; Donghoon Lee; Kenneth I Marro; Lawrence A Crum; Vera A Khokhlova; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Acoustic microcavitation: enhancement and applications.

Authors:  S I Madanshetty; R E Apfel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Correlation between inertial cavitation dose and endothelial cell damage in vivo.

Authors:  Joo Ha Hwang; Juan Tu; Andrew A Brayman; Thomas J Matula; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Probability of cavitation for single ultrasound pulses applied to tissues and tissue-mimicking materials.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Charles A Cain; Timothy L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Pulsed-high intensity focused ultrasound enhanced tPA mediated thrombolysis in a novel in vivo clot model, a pilot study.

Authors:  Michael J Stone; Victor Frenkel; Sergio Dromi; Peter Thomas; Ryan P Lewis; King C P Li; McDonald Horne; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 3.944

View more
  27 in total

1.  A new active cavitation mapping technique for pulsed HIFU applications--bubble Doppler.

Authors:  Tong Li; Tatiana D Khokhlova; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Matthew O'Donnell; Joo Ha Hwang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Dependence of inertial cavitation induced by high intensity focused ultrasound on transducer F-number and nonlinear waveform distortion.

Authors:  Tatiana Khokhlova; Pavel Rosnitskiy; Christopher Hunter; Adam Maxwell; Wayne Kreider; Gail Ter Haar; Marcia Costa; Oleg Sapozhnikov; Vera Khokhlova
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  For Whom the Bubble Grows: Physical Principles of Bubble Nucleation and Dynamics in Histotripsy Ultrasound Therapy.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Eli Vlaisavljevich; Adam D Maxwell
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Ultrasound Stimulation of Insulin Release from Pancreatic Beta Cells as a Potential Novel Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Ivan Suarez Castellanos; Aleksandar Jeremic; Joshua Cohen; Vesna Zderic
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Displacement Imaging for Focused Ultrasound Peripheral Nerve Neuromodulation.

Authors:  Stephen A Lee; Hermes A S Kamimura; Mark T Burgess; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Quantitative Frequency-Domain Passive Cavitation Imaging.

Authors:  Kevin J Haworth; Kenneth B Bader; Kyle T Rich; Christy K Holland; T Douglas Mast
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Release of Cell-free MicroRNA Tumor Biomarkers into the Blood Circulation with Pulsed Focused Ultrasound: A Noninvasive, Anatomically Localized, Molecular Liquid Biopsy.

Authors:  John R Chevillet; Tatiana D Khokhlova; Maria D Giraldez; George R Schade; Frank Starr; Yak-Nam Wang; Emily N Gallichotte; Kai Wang; Joo Ha Hwang; Muneesh Tewari
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Dependence of Boiling Histotripsy Treatment Efficiency on HIFU Frequency and Focal Pressure Levels.

Authors:  Tatiana D Khokhlova; Yasser A Haider; Adam D Maxwell; Wayne Kreider; Michael R Bailey; Vera A Khokhlova
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Pulsed High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Enhances Delivery of Doxorubicin in a Preclinical Model of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Tong Li; Yak-Nam Wang; Tatiana D Khokhlova; Samantha D'Andrea; Frank Starr; Hong Chen; Jeannine S McCune; Linda J Risler; Afshin Mashadi-Hossein; Sunil R Hingorani; Amy Chang; Joo Ha Hwang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Focused ultrasound for immuno-adjuvant treatment of pancreatic cancer: An emerging clinical paradigm in the era of personalized oncotherapy.

Authors:  Ezekiel Maloney; Tanya Khokhlova; Venu G Pillarisetty; George R Schade; Elizabeth A Repasky; Yak-Nam Wang; Lorenzo Giuliani; Matteo Primavera; Joo Ha Hwang
Journal:  Int Rev Immunol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.