Literature DB >> 21371666

Adoption of CT colonography by US hospitals.

Megan McHugh1, Awo Osei-Anto, Carrie N Klabunde, Barbara A Galen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a new noninvasive technology proposed as an option for colorectal cancer screening. The purpose of this study was to identify the percentage of US hospitals that offered CTC between 2005 and 2008 and factors that motivated or impeded adoption.
METHODS: Data on the provision of colorectal cancer screening services by nonfederal, general hospitals were analyzed using the 2005 to 2008 American Hospital Association annual surveys. Additionally, in 2009, exploratory interviews were conducted with representatives from radiology departments at 9 hospitals; 6 that provided CTC and 3 that did not.
RESULTS: In 2008, 17% of hospitals offered CTC, up from 13% in 2005. Sixty-nine percent of hospitals that offered CTC in 2008 also offered optical colonoscopy services. Factors motivating the adoption of CTC included a desire to provide an alternative screening option for frail, elderly patients and patients with failed optical colonoscopy; long waits for optical colonoscopy; and promising evidence on CTC published in peer-reviewed literature. Lack of reimbursement was a commonly cited barrier.
CONCLUSIONS: Growth of CT colonographic services at US hospitals occurred even in the absence of Medicare coverage or agreement among national guideline-setting organizations regarding CTC's use in screening. Almost one-third of hospitals that offer CTC do not offer optical colonoscopy and may not be prepared to provide adequate follow-up for patients with failed CTC.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Radiology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21371666      PMCID: PMC3058241          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  13 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?

Authors:  S Sofaer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Thomas B Richards; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Diane L Manninen; Leslie S Given; Fred B Dong; Linda D Winges; Matthew T McKenna
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Expanded use of imaging technology and the challenge of measuring value.

Authors:  Laurence C Baker; Scott W Atlas; Christopher C Afendulis
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Paying accurately for imaging services in medicare.

Authors:  Ariel Winter; Nancy Ray
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research.

Authors:  C Pope; N Mays
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-01

7.  Use of colorectal cancer tests--United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States.

Authors:  Helen I Meissner; Nancy Breen; Carrie N Klabunde; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Adoption and spread of new imaging technology: a case study.

Authors:  Joseph A Ladapo; Jill R Horwitz; Milton C Weinstein; G Scott Gazelle; David M Cutler
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Bernard Levin; David A Lieberman; Beth McFarland; Robert A Smith; Durado Brooks; Kimberly S Andrews; Chiranjeev Dash; Francis M Giardiello; Seth Glick; Theodore R Levin; Perry Pickhardt; Douglas K Rex; Alan Thorson; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  6 in total

1.  Adoption of Robotic Technology for Treating Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Mario Schootman; Samantha Hendren; Kendra Ratnapradipa; Lisa Stringer; Nick O Davidson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Initial experience with a dual-console robotic-assisted platform for training in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  J C Bolger; M P Broe; M A Zarog; A Looney; K McKevitt; D Walsh; S Giri; C Peirce; J C Coffey
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Impact of the 2008-2009 economic recession on screening colonoscopy utilization among the insured.

Authors:  Spencer D Dorn; David Wei; Joel F Farley; Nilay D Shah; Nicholas J Shaheen; Robert S Sandler; Michael D Kappelman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Optical colonoscopy and virtual colonoscopy numbers after initiation of a CT colonography program: long term data.

Authors:  Mark Benson; Jeff Pier; Sally Kraft; David Kim; Perry Pickhardt; Jennifer Weiss; Deepak Gopal; Mark Reichelderfer; Patrick Pfau
Journal:  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.008

5.  CT colonography: a survey of general practitioners' knowledge and interest.

Authors:  Nicola Flor; Andrea Laghi; Mauro Peri; Gianpaolo Cornalba; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Using computed tomography colonography in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer - a prospective study in a university hospital in South America.

Authors:  Augusto Castelli von Atzingen; Dario Ariel Tiferes; Elizabeth Deak; Délcio Matos; Giuseppe D'Ippolito
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.365

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.