Literature DB >> 21370283

The human carcinogen aristolochic acid i is activated to form DNA adducts by human NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase without the contribution of acetyltransferases or sulfotransferases.

Marie Stiborová1, Jaroslav Mareš, Eva Frei, Volker M Arlt, Václav Martínek, Heinz H Schmeiser.   

Abstract

Ingestion of aristolochic acid (AA) is associated with development of urothelial tumors linked with AA nephropathy and is implicated in the development of Balkan endemic nephropathy-associated urothelial tumors. We investigated the efficiency of human NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1) to activate aristolochic acid I (AAI) and used in silico docking, using soft-soft (flexible) docking procedure, to study the interactions of AAI with the active site of human NQO1. AAI binds to the active site of NQO1 indicating that the binding orientation allows for direct hydride transfer (i.e., two electron reductions) to the nitro group of AAI. NQO1 activated AAI, generating DNA adduct patterns reproducing those found in urothelial tissues from humans exposed to AA. Because reduced aromatic nitro-compounds are often further activated by sulfotransferases (SULTs) or N,O-acetlytransferases (NATs), their roles in AAI activation were investigated. Our results indicate that phase II reactions do not play a major role in AAI bioactivation; neither native enzymes present in human hepatic or renal cytosols nor human SULT1A1, -1A2, -1A3, -1E, or -2A nor NAT1 or NAT2 further enhanced DNA adduct formation by AAI. Instead under the in vitro conditions used, DNA adducts arise by enzymatic reduction of AAI through the formation of a cyclic hydroxamic acid (N-hydroxyaristolactam I) favored by the carboxy group in peri position to the nitro group without additional conjugation. These results emphasize the major importance of NQO1 in the metabolic activation of AAI and provide the first evidence that initial nitroreduction is the rate limiting step in AAI activation.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21370283     DOI: 10.1002/em.20642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  23 in total

1.  Differential methylation pattern of xenobiotic metabolizing genes and susceptibility to Balkan endemic nephropathy, in a cohort of Romanian patients.

Authors:  Alexandra Ivan; Dilys Lam; Mirabela Iustina Cristea; Ada Telea; Alexandra Teodora Gruia; Camelia Oprean; Florin Margineanu; Florina Maria Bojin; Richard Saffery; Virgil Paunescu; Calin Adrian Tatu
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.902

2.  Effect of base sequence context on the conformational heterogeneity of aristolactam-I adducted DNA: structural and energetic insights into sequence-dependent repair and mutagenicity.

Authors:  Preetleen Kathuria; Purshotam Sharma; Stacey D Wetmore
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Human liver-kidney model elucidates the mechanisms of aristolochic acid nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  Shih-Yu Chang; Elijah J Weber; Viktoriya S Sidorenko; Alenka Chapron; Catherine K Yeung; Chunying Gao; Qingcheng Mao; Danny Shen; Joanne Wang; Thomas A Rosenquist; Kathleen G Dickman; Thomas Neumann; Arthur P Grollman; Edward J Kelly; Jonathan Himmelfarb; David L Eaton
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-11-16

4.  Aristolochic acid I metabolism in the isolated perfused rat kidney.

Authors:  Horacio A Priestap; M Cecilia Torres; Robert A Rieger; Kathleen G Dickman; Tomoko Freshwater; David R Taft; Manuel A Barbieri; Charles R Iden
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  Bioactivation versus detoxication of the urothelial carcinogen aristolochic acid I by human cytochrome P450 1A1 and 1A2.

Authors:  Marie Stiborová; Katerina Levová; Frantisek Bárta; Zhanquan Shi; Eva Frei; Heinz H Schmeiser; Daniel W Nebert; David H Phillips; Volker M Arlt
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  A fluorescence-based analysis of aristolochic acid-derived DNA adducts.

Authors:  Victor Romanov; Victoria Sidorenko; Thomas A Rosenquist; Terry Whyard; Arthur P Grollman
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.365

7.  Sulfotransferase-1A1-dependent bioactivation of aristolochic acid I and N-hydroxyaristolactam I in human cells.

Authors:  Keiji Hashimoto; Irina N Zaitseva; Radha Bonala; Sivaprasad Attaluri; Katherine Ozga; Charles R Iden; Francis Johnson; Masaaki Moriya; Arthur P Grollman; Viktoriya S Sidorenko
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Mutagenicity and DNA adduct formation by aristolochic acid in the spleen of Big Blue® rats.

Authors:  L Patrice McDaniel; Elizabeth R Elander; Xiaoqing Guo; Tao Chen; Volker M Arlt; Nan Mei
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Structure and stability of DNA containing an aristolactam II-dA lesion: implications for the NER recognition of bulky adducts.

Authors:  Mark Lukin; Tanya Zaliznyak; Francis Johnson; Carlos de los Santos
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Bioactivation of the human carcinogen aristolochic acid.

Authors:  Viktoriya S Sidorenko; Sivaprasad Attaluri; Irina Zaitseva; Charles R Iden; Kathleen G Dickman; Francis Johnson; Arthur P Grollman
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 4.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.