Literature DB >> 21367982

Multiplex immunoassay for Lyme disease using VlsE1-IgG and pepC10-IgM antibodies: improving test performance through bioinformatics.

Richard B Porwancher1, C Greg Hagerty, Jianqing Fan, Lisa Landsberg, Barbara J B Johnson, Mark Kopnitsky, Allen C Steere, Karen Kulas, Susan J Wong.   

Abstract

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention currently recommends a 2-tier serologic approach to Lyme disease laboratory diagnosis, comprised of an initial serum enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for antibody to Borrelia burgdorferi followed by supplementary IgG and IgM Western blotting of EIA-positive or -equivocal samples. Western blot accuracy is limited by subjective interpretation of weakly positive bands, false-positive IgM immunoblots, and low sensitivity for detection of early disease. We developed an objective alternative second-tier immunoassay using a multiplex microsphere system that measures VlsE1-IgG and pepC10-IgM antibodies simultaneously in the same sample. Our study population comprised 79 patients with early acute Lyme disease, 82 patients with early-convalescent-phase disease, 47 patients with stage II and III disease, 34 patients post-antibiotic treatment, and 794 controls. A bioinformatic technique called partial receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) regression was used to combine individual antibody levels into a single diagnostic score with a single cutoff; this technique enhances test performance when a high specificity is required (e.g., ≥ 95%). Compared to Western blotting, the multiplex assay was equally specific (95.6%) but 20.7% more sensitive for early-convalescent-phase disease (89.0% versus 68.3%, respectively; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] for difference, 12.1% to 30.9%) and 12.5% more sensitive overall (75.0% versus 62.5%, respectively; 95% CI for difference, 8.1% to 17.1%). As a second-tier test, a multiplex assay for VlsE1-IgG and pepC10-IgM antibodies performed as well as or better than Western blotting for Lyme disease diagnosis. Prospective validation studies appear to be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21367982      PMCID: PMC3122529          DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00409-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol        ISSN: 1556-679X


  30 in total

1.  Regularized ROC method for disease classification and biomarker selection with microarray data.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Jian Huang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Combining predictors for classification using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Tianxi Cai; Gary Longton
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Advanced multiplexed analysis with the FlowMetrix system.

Authors:  R J Fulton; R L McDade; P L Smith; L J Kienker; J R Kettman
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Decision support for diagnosis of lyme disease.

Authors:  Ole K Hejlesen; Kristian G Olesen; Ram Dessau; Ivan Beltoft; Michael Trangeled
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2005

5.  Simultaneous use of serum IgG and IgM for risk scoring of suspected early Lyme borreliosis: graphical and bivariate analyses.

Authors:  Ram B Dessau; Tove Ejlertsen; Jørgen Hilden
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 6.  Diagnosis of lyme borreliosis.

Authors:  Maria E Aguero-Rosenfeld; Guiqing Wang; Ira Schwartz; Gary P Wormser
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  A reanalysis of IgM Western blot criteria for the diagnosis of early Lyme disease.

Authors:  R Porwancher
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Prospective study of serologic tests for lyme disease.

Authors:  Allen C Steere; Gail McHugh; Nitin Damle; Vijay K Sikand
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  A genome-wide proteome array reveals a limited set of immunogens in natural infections of humans and white-footed mice with Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  Alan G Barbour; Algimantas Jasinskas; Matthew A Kayala; D Huw Davies; Allen C Steere; Pierre Baldi; Philip L Felgner
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Dominant epitopes of the C6 diagnostic peptide of Borrelia burgdorferi are largely inaccessible to antibody on the parent VlsE molecule.

Authors:  Monica E Embers; Mary B Jacobs; Barbara J B Johnson; Mario T Philipp
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-06-13
View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease: advances and challenges.

Authors:  Adriana R Marques
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.982

2.  A Multiplexed Serologic Test for Diagnosis of Lyme Disease for Point-of-Care Use.

Authors:  Siddarth Arumugam; Samiksha Nayak; Taylor Williams; Francesco Serra di Santa Maria; Mariana Soares Guedes; Rodrigo Cotrim Chaves; Vincent Linder; Adriana R Marques; Elizabeth J Horn; Susan J Wong; Samuel K Sia; Maria Gomes-Solecki
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  A concise critical analysis of serologic testing for the diagnosis of lyme disease.

Authors:  Roberta L DeBiasi
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.725

4.  Detection of IFN-γ Secretion by T Cells Collected Before and After Successful Treatment of Early Lyme Disease.

Authors:  Steven M Callister; Dean A Jobe; Aleksandra Stuparic-Stancic; Misato Miyamasu; Jeff Boyle; Raymond J Dattwyler; Paul M Arnaboldi
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Comparative cost-effectiveness of two-tiered testing strategies for serodiagnosis of lyme disease with noncutaneous manifestations.

Authors:  Gary P Wormser; Andrew Levin; Sandeep Soman; Omosalewa Adenikinju; Michael V Longo; John A Branda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Performance of a multiplexed serological microarray for the detection of antibodies against central nervous system pathogens.

Authors:  Anne J Jääskeläinen; Sari M Viitala; Satu Kurkela; Satu Hepojoki; Heidi Sillanpää; Hannimari Kallio-Kokko; Tomas Bergström; Jukka Suni; Ale Närvänen; Olli Vapalahti; Antti Vaheri
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 2.363

7.  Development of a Multiantigen Panel for Improved Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi Infection in Early Lyme Disease.

Authors:  Lauren J Lahey; Michael W Panas; Rong Mao; Michelle Delanoy; John J Flanagan; Steven R Binder; Alison W Rebman; Jose G Montoya; Mark J Soloski; Allen C Steere; Raymond J Dattwyler; Paul M Arnaboldi; John N Aucott; William H Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Lyme Disease, Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis, and Babesiosis: A Review.

Authors:  Edgar Sanchez; Edouard Vannier; Gary P Wormser; Linden T Hu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Revisiting the Lyme Disease Serodiagnostic Algorithm: the Momentum Gathers.

Authors:  Adriana R Marques
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Emerging Tick-Borne Diseases.

Authors:  Susan Madison-Antenucci; Laura D Kramer; Linda L Gebhardt; Elizabeth Kauffman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.