Literature DB >> 21367618

Does "spreading" skin dose by rotating the C-arm during an intervention work?

Alexander S Pasciak1, A Kyle Jones.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if C-arm rotation is beneficial for reducing peak skin dose (PSD) in interventional radiology (IR) and, if so, under what circumstances.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Monte Carlo method was used to perform ray tracing for detailed analyses of the effect of C-arm rotation on PSD across a range of patient sizes, C-arm configurations, and procedure types. Automatic dose-rate control curves on modern fluoroscopic systems were measured for input into the simulations.
RESULTS: Rotating the C-arm to reduce the PSD is in most cases contraindicated and results in increased PSD when the C-arm is rotated from an original posteroanterior projection, in some cases resulting in a PSD increase by a factor of 5 or more. When prophylactic rotation was performed before a procedure, however, and the C-arm was rotated between opposed, distinct oblique angles, substantial reduction in PSD was achieved for patients of any size.
CONCLUSIONS: Rotating the C-arm during a procedure with the aim of "spreading" dose on the skin of the patient may not result in a reduction in PSD and may increase PSD. However, when used as a prophylactic measure combined with tight x-ray beam collimation, C-arm rotation can be used as a tool to reduce PSD. Tight collimation greatly increases the benefit of C-arm rotation.
Copyright © 2011 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21367618     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  6 in total

Review 1.  Radiation-related injuries and their management: an update.

Authors:  Kevin Wunderle; Amanjit S Gill
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  C-arm rotation as a method for reducing peak skin dose in interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Alexander S Pasciak; Austin C Bourgeois; A Kyle Jones
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2014-12-23

Review 3.  Calculating the peak skin dose resulting from fluoroscopically guided interventions. Part I: Methods.

Authors:  A Kyle Jones; Alexander S Pasciak
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Calculating the peak skin dose resulting from fluoroscopically-guided interventions. Part II: case studies.

Authors:  A Kyle Jones; Alexander S Pasciak
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Real-time, ray casting-based scatter dose estimation for c-arm x-ray system.

Authors:  Zaid Alnewaini; Eric Langer; Philipp Schaber; Matthias David; Dominik Kretz; Volker Steil; Jürgen Hesser
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 12.a: Fluoroscopy dose management.

Authors:  Ryan F Fisher; Kimberly E Applegate; Lindsey K Berkowitz; Olav Christianson; Jaydev K Dave; Lindsay DeWeese; Nichole Harris; Mary Ellen Jafari; A Kyle Jones; Robert J Kobistek; Brendan Loughran; Loren Marous; Donald L Miller; Beth Schueler; Bryan C Schwarz; Adam Springer; Kevin A Wunderle
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.