Literature DB >> 21366528

Tumor physiology and charge dynamics of anticancer drugs: implications for camptothecin-based drug development.

D J Adams1, L R Morgan.   

Abstract

Charge is an important characteristic of drug molecules, since ionization sites determine the pKa at a particular pH. The pKa in turn can affect many parameters, including solubility, dissolution rate, reaction kinetics, formulation, cell permeability, tissue distribution, renal elimination, metabolism, protein binding and receptor interactions. The impact of charge dynamics is amplified in human solid tumors that exhibit the glycolytic phenotype and associated acidic extracellular microenvironment. This phenotype is driven by hypoxia and creates a pH gradient in tumors that favors uptake of weak acids and exclusion of weak bases. Established anticancer drugs exhibit a range of pKa's and thus variable ability to exploit the tumor pH gradient. The camptothecins are a prime example as they represent a diverse class of approved anticancer drugs and drug candidates whose charge distribution varies with pH. An in silico method was used to predict charge distribution of camptothecins at physiological versus acidic pH in both the lactone and carboxylate forms. A significant amount of uncharged carboxylate was predicted at acidic pH that could enter tumor cells and accumulate in mitochondria to inhibit mitochondrial topoisomerase I. A model is presented to describe the charge dynamics of a new camptothecin analog and the impact on nuclear and mitochondrial mechanism(s) of action. This example illustrates the importance of integrating tumor physiology and charge dynamics into anticancer drug development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21366528      PMCID: PMC3086837          DOI: 10.2174/092986711795029609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Chem        ISSN: 0929-8673            Impact factor:   4.530


  33 in total

1.  On respiratory impairment in cancer cells.

Authors:  O WARBURG
Journal:  Science       Date:  1956-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Critical Compilation of pK(a) Values for Pharmaceutical Substances.

Authors:  Richard J Prankerd
Journal:  Profiles Drug Subst Excip Relat Methodol       Date:  2007-11-21

3.  Culturing at atmospheric oxygen levels impacts lymphocyte function.

Authors:  Kondala R Atkuri; Leonard A Herzenberg; Leonore A Herzenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Benchmarking and validating algorithms that estimate pK(a) values of drugs based on their molecular structures.

Authors:  Milan Meloun; Sylva Bordovská
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Camptothecin analogues with enhanced antitumor activity at acidic pH.

Authors:  D J Adams; M W Dewhirst; J L Flowers; M P Gamcsik; O M Colvin; G Manikumar; M C Wani; M E Wall
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  pH and drug resistance in tumors.

Authors:  Natarajan Raghunand; Robert J. Gillies
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 18.500

7.  Kinetics of lactone hydrolysis in antitumor drugs of camptothecin series as studied by fluorescence spectroscopy.

Authors:  I Chourpa; J M Millot; G D Sockalingum; J F Riou; M Manfait
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1998-03-02

8.  Comparison of nine programs predicting pK(a) values of pharmaceutical substances.

Authors:  Chenzhong Liao; Marc C Nicklaus
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  The glycolytic phenotype in carcinogenesis and tumor invasion: insights through mathematical models.

Authors:  Robert A Gatenby; Edward T Gawlinski
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Understanding the tumor metabolic phenotype in the genomic era.

Authors:  M Stubbs; C L Bashford; J R Griffiths
Journal:  Curr Mol Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.222

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Cancer nanomedicines targeting tumor extracellular pH.

Authors:  Li Tian; You Han Bae
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 5.268

Review 2.  Nanoparticles for Targeting Intratumoral Hypoxia: Exploiting a Potential Weakness of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Mihaela Aldea; Ioan Alexandru Florian; Gabriel Kacso; Lucian Craciun; Sanda Boca; Olga Soritau; Ioan Stefan Florian
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  The Valley of Death in anticancer drug development: a reassessment.

Authors:  David J Adams
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 4.  Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Therapy for Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Amitesh Verma; Sarwish Rafiq
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2022

5.  Targeting ion transport in cancer.

Authors:  E Oosterwijk; R J Gillies
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  In vivo tumour extracellular pH monitoring using electron paramagnetic resonance: the effect of X-ray irradiation.

Authors:  Jonathan Goodwin; Katsuya Yachi; Masaki Nagane; Hironobu Yasui; Yusuke Miyake; Osamu Inanami; Andrey A Bobko; Valery V Khramtsov; Hiroshi Hirata
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 7.  DNA topoisomerase-targeting chemotherapeutics: what's new?

Authors:  Selma M Cuya; Mary-Ann Bjornsti; Robert C A M van Waardenburg
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 8.  PSMA-Targeting Imaging and Theranostic Agents-Current Status and Future Perspective.

Authors:  Sashi Debnath; Ning Zhou; Mark McLaughlin; Samuel Rice; Anil K Pillai; Guiyang Hao; Xiankai Sun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Design of High-Specificity Nanocarriers by Exploiting Non-Equilibrium Effects in Cancer Cell Targeting.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsekouras; Igor Goncharenko; Michael E Colvin; Kerwyn Casey Huang; Ajay Gopinathan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Influence of Hypoxia and pH on Bioluminescence Imaging of Luciferase-Transfected Tumor Cells and Xenografts.

Authors:  Ashraf A Khalil; Mark J Jameson; William C Broaddus; Peck Sun Lin; Seth M Dever; Sarah E Golding; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Kristoffer Valerie; Theodore D Chung
Journal:  Int J Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.