Literature DB >> 27230936

Nanoparticles for Targeting Intratumoral Hypoxia: Exploiting a Potential Weakness of Glioblastoma.

Mihaela Aldea1, Ioan Alexandru Florian2, Gabriel Kacso3, Lucian Craciun4, Sanda Boca5, Olga Soritau6, Ioan Stefan Florian7.   

Abstract

Extensive hypoxic regions are the daunting hallmark of glioblastoma, as they host aggressive stem-like cells, hinder drug delivery and shield cancer cells from the effects of radiotherapy. Nanotechnology could address most of these issues, as it employs nanoparticles (NPs) carrying drugs that selectively accumulate and achieve controlled drug release in tumor tissues. Methods overcoming the stiff interstitium and scarce vascularity within hypoxic zones include the incorporation of collagenases to degrade the collagen-rich tumor extracellular matrix, the use of multistage systems that progressively reduce NP size or of NP-loaded cells that display inherent hypoxia-targeting abilities. The unfavorable hypoxia-induced low pH could be converted into a therapeutical advantage by pH-responsive NPs or multilayer NPs, while overexpressed markers of hypoxic cells could be specifically targeted for an enhanced preferential drug delivery. Finally, promising new gene therapeutics could also be incorporated into nanovehicles, which could lead to silencing of hypoxia-specific genes that are overexpressed in cancer cells. In this review, we highlight NPs which have shown promising results in targeting cancer hypoxia and we discuss their applicability in glioblastoma, as well as possible limitations. Novel research directions in this field are also considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glioblastoma; hypoxia; nanoparticles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27230936     DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1947-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  171 in total

Review 1.  Delivery of local therapeutics to the brain: working toward advancing treatment for malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Kaisorn L Chaichana; Leon Pinheiro; Henry Brem
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  Nitroimidazole radiopharmaceuticals in hypoxia: part II cytotoxicity and radiosensitization applications.

Authors:  Rakesh Sharma
Journal:  Curr Radiopharm       Date:  2011-10

3.  Size- and age-dependent neurotoxicity of engineered metal nanoparticles in rats.

Authors:  Aruna Sharma; Dafin F Muresanu; Ranjana Patnaik; Hari S Sharma
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  Intratumoral hypoxia, radiation resistance, and HIF-1.

Authors:  Gregg L Semenza
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial.

Authors:  Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Martin J B Taphoorn; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Anouk Allgeier; Barbara Fisher; Karl Belanger; Peter Hau; Alba A Brandes; Johanna Gijtenbeek; Christine Marosi; Charles J Vecht; Karima Mokhtari; Pieter Wesseling; Salvador Villa; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Thierry Gorlia; Michael Weller; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; René-Olivier Mirimanoff
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Size-dependent cytotoxicity of gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yu Pan; Sabine Neuss; Annika Leifert; Monika Fischler; Fei Wen; Ulrich Simon; Günter Schmid; Wolfgang Brandau; Willi Jahnen-Dechent
Journal:  Small       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 13.281

7.  The Cancer Cell Oxygen Sensor PHD2 Promotes Metastasis via Activation of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Anna Kuchnio; Stijn Moens; Ulrike Bruning; Karol Kuchnio; Bert Cruys; Bernard Thienpont; Michaël Broux; Andreea Alexandra Ungureanu; Rodrigo Leite de Oliveira; Françoise Bruyère; Henar Cuervo; Ann Manderveld; An Carton; Juan Ramon Hernandez-Fernaud; Sara Zanivan; Carmen Bartic; Jean-Michel Foidart; Agnes Noel; Stefan Vinckier; Diether Lambrechts; Mieke Dewerchin; Massimiliano Mazzone; Peter Carmeliet
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 8.  Nanoparticles for brain drug delivery.

Authors:  Massimo Masserini
Journal:  ISRN Biochem       Date:  2013-05-21

Review 9.  Central nervous system toxicity of metallic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Xiaoli Feng; Aijie Chen; Yanli Zhang; Jianfeng Wang; Longquan Shao; Limin Wei
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-07-03

10.  Accumulation of extracellular hyaluronan by hyaluronan synthase 3 promotes tumor growth and modulates the pancreatic cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Anne Kultti; Chunmei Zhao; Netai C Singha; Susan Zimmerman; Ryan J Osgood; Rebecca Symons; Ping Jiang; Xiaoming Li; Curtis B Thompson; Jeffrey R Infante; Michael A Jacobetz; David A Tuveson; Gregory I Frost; H Michael Shepard; Zhongdong Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Gather wisdom to overcome barriers: Well-designed nano-drug delivery systems for treating gliomas.

Authors:  Jiwei Cui; Yuanxin Xu; Haiyan Tu; Huacong Zhao; Honglan Wang; Liuqing Di; Ruoning Wang
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 14.903

2.  Modulation of Hypoxia-Induced Chemoresistance to Polymeric Micellar Cisplatin: The Effect of Ligand Modification of Micellar Carrier Versus Inhibition of the Mediators of Drug Resistance.

Authors:  Hoda Soleymani Abyaneh; Amir Hassan Soleimani; Mohammad Reza Vakili; Rania Soudy; Kamaljit Kaur; Francesco Cuda; Ali Tavassoli; Afsaneh Lavasanifar
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 3.  Alliance with EPR Effect: Combined Strategies to Improve the EPR Effect in the Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Jooho Park; Yongwhan Choi; Hyeyoun Chang; Wooram Um; Ju Hee Ryu; Ick Chan Kwon
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 11.556

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.