Literature DB >> 22848286

The prognostic importance of cathepsin D and E-cadherin in early breast cancer: A single-institution experience.

Galia Jacobson-Raber1, Irena Lazarev, Victor Novack, Willmosh Mermershtein, Yael Baumfeld, David B Geffen, Netta Sion-Vardy, Samuel Ariad.   

Abstract

Molecular tools have increasingly been used for decision-making in patients with early breast cancer (EBC). Nevertheless, simple tools such as immunohistochemistry may still be required in particular cases to complement traditional and molecular prognosticators. In this study, the prognostic significance of three well-known immunohistochemical biomarkers, cathepsin D, E-cadherin and Ki67, was studied in 270 patients with EBC, followed by a median time of 126 months in a single institution. Histological examination was performed to confirm the histopathological diagnosis and select specimens. The specimens were evaluated using immunohistochemistry and survival curves were plotted. Results revealed the following patient characteristics: node-negative/1-3 lymph nodes in 228 (86%) patients, hormone receptor-positive in 217 (80%); triple-negative in 31 (11%), and Her2-overexpression in 23 (9%) patients. Breast cancer-related events occurred in 37 patients (14%). A total of 217 patients (80%) survived. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for breast cancer-specific survival showed an area under curve for the clinicopathological model of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.64-0.86), 0.79 (95% CI, 0.68-0.90) for the three-biomarker model, and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.92) for the E-cadherin and cathepsin D only model. We propose that a simple prognostic model based on combined scores of E-cadherin and cathepsin D may aid treatment decisions in patients with EBC.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22848286      PMCID: PMC3406547          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2011.393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  24 in total

Review 1.  Classical cadherin adhesion molecules: coordinating cell adhesion, signaling and the cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Marita Goodwin; Alpha S Yap
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.611

2.  The propeptide of cathepsin D increases proliferation, invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Sujata Saraswat Ohri; Aruna Vashishta; Mary Proctor; Martin Fusek; Vaclav Vetvicka
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 3.  Wnt and mammary stem cells: hormones cannot fly wingless.

Authors:  Kevin Roarty; Jeffrey M Rosen
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.547

4.  REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK).

Authors:  Lisa M McShane; Douglas G Altman; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube; Massimo Gion; Gary M Clark
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2005-08

5.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1-3, 2000.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2001

Review 7.  Prediction of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in endocrine responsive, early breast cancer using multigene assays.

Authors:  Kathy S Albain; Soonmyung Paik; Laura van't Veer
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  A "quickscore" method for immunohistochemical semiquantitation: validation for oestrogen receptor in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  S Detre; G Saclani Jotti; M Dowsett
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; J N Ingle; R D Gelber; A S Coates; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 10.  Predictive markers in breast cancer--the present.

Authors:  S J L Payne; R L Bowen; J L Jones; C A Wells
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.087

View more
  8 in total

1.  Association of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, CYCLIN D1 and Cathepsin D with Clinicopathological Parameters in Breast Carcinoma; an Immunohistochemical Study.

Authors:  Özgür Külahcı; H Hasan Esen; Elife Asut; Salim Güngör
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2017-01-01

2.  Cathepsin D inhibitors as potential therapeutics for breast cancer treatment: Molecular docking and bioevaluation against triple-negative and triple-positive breast cancers.

Authors:  Hasitha Shilpa Anantaraju; Madhu Babu Battu; Srikant Viswanadha; Dharmarajan Sriram; Perumal Yogeeswari
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  Nuclear cathepsin D enhances TRPS1 transcriptional repressor function to regulate cell cycle progression and transformation in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Bach; Danielle Derocq; Valérie Laurent-Matha; Philippe Montcourrier; Salwa Sebti; Béatrice Orsetti; Charles Theillet; Céline Gongora; Sophie Pattingre; Eva Ibing; Pascal Roger; Laetitia K Linares; Thomas Reinheckel; Guillaume Meurice; Frank J Kaiser; Christian Gespach; Emmanuelle Liaudet-Coopman
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-29

4.  Co-Expression of Androgen Receptor and Cathepsin D Defines a Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subgroup with Poorer Overall Survival.

Authors:  Hanane Mansouri; Lindsay B Alcaraz; Caroline Mollevi; Aude Mallavialle; William Jacot; Florence Boissière-Michot; Joelle Simony-Lafontaine; Valérie Laurent-Matha; Pascal Roger; Emmanuelle Liaudet-Coopman; Séverine Guiu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Increasing intratumor C/EBP-β LIP and nitric oxide levels overcome resistance to doxorubicin in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Iris C Salaroglio; Elena Gazzano; Ahmad Abdullrahman; Eleonora Mungo; Barbara Castella; Gamal Eldein Fathy Abd-Ellatef Abd-Elrahman; Massimo Massaia; Massimo Donadelli; Menachem Rubinstein; Chiara Riganti; Joanna Kopecka
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-11-27

6.  Prognostic role of high cathepsin D expression in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junho Kang; Yeuni Yu; Seongdo Jeong; Hansong Lee; Hye Jin Heo; Jeong Jun Park; Hee Sam Na; Dai Sik Ko; Yun Hak Kim
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 8.168

7.  Cathepsin D Expression in Colorectal Cancer: From Proteomic Discovery through Validation Using Western Blotting, Immunohistochemistry, and Tissue Microarrays.

Authors:  Chandra Kirana; Hongjun Shi; Emma Laing; Kylie Hood; Rose Miller; Peter Bethwaite; John Keating; T William Jordan; Mark Hayes; Richard Stubbs
Journal:  Int J Proteomics       Date:  2012-08-07

8.  Hub Gene and Its Key Effects on Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma by Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis.

Authors:  Chao Ma; Haoyu Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.