Literature DB >> 21359938

Performance of radiological methods in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma preoperatively in a recipient of living related liver transplantation: comparison with step section histopathology.

Masakazu Hirakawa1, Kengo Yoshimitsu, Hiroyuki Irie, Tsuyoshi Tajima, Akihiro Nishie, Yoshiki Asayama, Kousei Ishigami, Daisuke Kakihara, Akinobu Taketomi, Shin-ichi Aishima, Hiroshi Honda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of multidetector-row CT (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) preoperatively in living related liver transplantation (LRLT) recipients with liver cirrhosis and HCC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 LRLT recipients with 89 pathologically proved HCCs underwent dynamic 4-row MDCT (5 mm collimation) and MRI within 1 month before LRLT. The images were reviewed for the diagnosis of HCC on a tumor-by-tumor basis by three observers independently and randomly using explanted specimens as the gold standard. The diagnostic accuracy of these techniques in the detection of HCC was assessed with alternative free response receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The sensitivity and positive predictive values were evaluated.
RESULTS: The average values of the area under the ROC curve (Az) of MRI images were higher than those obtained with MDCT; however, no significant difference was observed (P > 0.05). The overall sensitivity of HCC with MRI was higher than that with MDCT, especially in the case of HCCs <20 mm.
CONCLUSION: A better diagnostic performance regarding HCCs in LRLT recipients was achieved with MRI than with MDCT, although no significant difference was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21359938     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-010-0528-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  39 in total

1.  Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: expansion of the tumor size limits does not adversely impact survival.

Authors:  F Y Yao; L Ferrell; N M Bass; J J Watson; P Bacchetti; A Venook; N L Ascher; J P Roberts
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI versus triple-phase MDCT for the preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Seong Hyun Kim; Dongil Choi; Seung Hoon Kim; Jae Hoon Lim; Won Jae Lee; Min Ju Kim; Hyo K Lim; Soon Jin Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers: double-contrast thin-section MR imaging with pathologic correlation of explanted tissue.

Authors:  Bobby Bhartia; Janice Ward; J Ashley Guthrie; Philip J Robinson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Non-resective ablation and liver transplantation in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): safety and efficacy.

Authors:  D Maluf; R A Fisher; T Maroney; A Cotterell; A Fulcher; J Tisnado; M Contos; V Luketic; R Stravitz; M Shiffman; R Sterling; M Posner
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus triple-phase MDCT for the preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Seong Hyun Kim; Seung Hoon Kim; Jongmee Lee; Min Ju Kim; Yong Hwan Jeon; Yulri Park; Dongil Choi; Won Jae Lee; Hyo K Lim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  The Barcelona approach: diagnosis, staging, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Josep M Llovet; Josep Fuster; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Preoperative depiction of hepatocellular carcinoma: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus triple-phase helical CT.

Authors:  Bo Kiung Kang; Jae Hoon Lim; Seung Hoon Kim; Dongil Choi; Hyo Keun Lim; Won Jae Lee; Soon Jin Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Deep Learning Model With Convolutional Neural Network for Detecting and Segmenting Hepatocellular Carcinoma in CT: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Vo Tan Duc; Phan Cong Chien; Le Duy Mai Huyen; Tran Le Minh Chau; Nguyen Do Trung Chanh; Duong Thi Minh Soan; Hoang Cao Huyen; Huynh Minh Thanh; Le Nguyen Gia Hy; Nguyen Hoang Nam; Mai Thi Tu Uyen; Le Huu Hanh Nhi; Le Huu Nhat Minh
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-17

Review 2.  Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Tin Nadarevic; Vanja Giljaca; Agostino Colli; Mirella Fraquelli; Giovanni Casazza; Damir Miletic; Davor Štimac
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-06

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced dynamic CT for small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma and assessment of dynamic enhancement patterns: Results of two-year follow-up using cone-beam CT hepatic arteriography.

Authors:  Ye Ra Choi; Jin Wook Chung; Mi Hye Yu; Myungsu Lee; Jung Hoon Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.