Literature DB >> 12591657

Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers: double-contrast thin-section MR imaging with pathologic correlation of explanted tissue.

Bobby Bhartia1, Janice Ward, J Ashley Guthrie, Philip J Robinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to determine the sensitivity of double-contrast MR imaging in the detection of hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with a cirrhotic liver. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients underwent double-contrast MR imaging and subsequent liver transplantation. Breath-hold T1- and T2-weighted MR images were obtained before and after administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide, and three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo MR images were obtained 10, 40, and 120 sec after a bolus injection of gadolinium. Hypervascular lesions that failed to take up superparamagnetic iron oxide were regarded as showing typical characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma; lesions that had only one of these two characteristics (either hypervascularity or failure to take up superparamagnetic iron oxide) were regarded as highly suspicious for hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology reports were correlated with pathology reports for the explanted livers.
RESULTS: Thirty-two hepatocellular carcinomas were found in 14 of the 31 patients. Combining the number of MR imaging reports citing lesions that were "typical of hepatocellular carcinoma" with the number of those citing lesions that were "highly suspicious," we found that for 25 of 32 lesions, an accurate MR imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma was made (overall sensitivity, 78%). These lesions included 10 of the 11 lesions that were larger than 20 mm (sensitivity, 91%), 12 of the 13 lesions that were 11-20 mm (sensitivity, 92%), and three of the eight lesions that were 10 mm or less (sensitivity, 38%). Nineteen (76%) of 25 lesions had characteristics considered typical of hepatocellular carcinoma; the remaining six lesions either failed to take up superparamagnetic iron oxide and were hypovascular or were hypervascular but showed some uptake of superparamagnetic iron oxide.
CONCLUSION: In patients with a cirrhotic liver, double-contrast MR imaging is highly sensitive in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinomas of 10 mm or larger, but success in the identification of tumors smaller than 10 mm is still limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12591657     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.180.3.1800577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  28 in total

1.  Evaluating the validity of model for end-stage liver disease exception points for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with multiple nodules <2 cm.

Authors:  Mariya L Samoylova; Jennifer L Dodge; Neil Mehta; Francis Y Yao; John P Roberts
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  Surveillance and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Lorenzo Andreana; Graziella Isgrò; Maria Pleguezuelo; Giacomo Germani; Andrew K Burroughs
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2009-10-31

Review 3.  [Radiological diagnosis of hepatic tumors. Part II: Identification and differential diagnosis].

Authors:  G Layer; S Delorme
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  The added diagnostic value of 64-row multidetector CT combined with contrast-enhanced US in the evaluation of hepatocellular nodule vascularity: implications in the diagnosis of malignancy in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia; Valerio Alaimo; Elisa Baratella; Alessandro Medeot; Massimo Midiri; Maria Assunta Cova
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Performance of radiological methods in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma preoperatively in a recipient of living related liver transplantation: comparison with step section histopathology.

Authors:  Masakazu Hirakawa; Kengo Yoshimitsu; Hiroyuki Irie; Tsuyoshi Tajima; Akihiro Nishie; Yoshiki Asayama; Kousei Ishigami; Daisuke Kakihara; Akinobu Taketomi; Shin-ichi Aishima; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 6.  [Indications for magnetic resonance imaging in Internal Medicine. When do we really need this technology?].

Authors:  A G Schreyer; K Debl; H Herfarth
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 7.  Nodule in Liver: Investigations, Differential Diagnosis and Follow-up.

Authors:  Padaki N Rao
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2014-07-23

Review 8.  Nanomedicines in gastroenterology and hepatology.

Authors:  Alf Lamprecht
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 9.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in liver cancer.

Authors:  Simona Leoni; Ilaria Serio; Anna Pecorelli; Sara Marinelli; Luigi Bolondi
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2015-01-12

10.  Pre-liver transplant biopsy in hepatocellular carcinoma: a potential criterion for exclusion from transplantation?

Authors:  Richard S Young; Mohammed Aldiwani; Abdul R Hakeem; Amit Nair; Ashley Guthrie; Judy Wyatt; Darren Treanor; Gareth Morris-Stiff; Rebecca L Jones; K Rajendra Prasad
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.