Literature DB >> 30778800

Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early cancer involving the upper third: can we go higher?

Chun-Chao Zhu1,2, Hui Cao2, Felix Berlth1,3, Jia Xu2, Shin-Hoo Park1, Hwi-Nyeong Choe1, Yun-Suhk Suh1, Seong-Ho Kong1, Hyuk-Joon Lee1,4, Woo-Ho Kim5, Han-Kwang Yang6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) is commonly performed for early gastric cancer (EGC) located in middle third of the stomach. We investigated the surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of PPG involving the upper third of stomach.
METHODS: We included all patients of the period 2013-2016 who underwent PPG, distal subtotal gastrectomy (DSG), and total gastrectomy (TG) for EGC involving the upper third by carefully defining the localization. Surgical, oncological, and functional outcome analyses included postoperative morbidity, lymph-node metastasis, tumor recurrence, postoperative body weight, body mass index, hemoglobin, total protein, albumin, quantification of intraabdominal fat, and gallstone development.
RESULTS: Overall, 288 cases were analyzed: 145 PPG, 61 DSG, and 82 TG. In the study period, patients potentially underwent PPG for EGC involving the upper third, if enough proximal remnant stomach was found whilst achieving a sufficient proximal margin. PPG resulted in less operation time (p < 0.001), less blood loss (p = 0.002) and lower postoperative morbidity compared to TG. For lymph-node (LN) stations being resected in all groups, no difference was found in number of resected LN. Recurrence-free survival was similar for all groups. PPG showed advantages regarding postoperative body weight, hemoglobin, total protein, albumin in postoperative 6 and 12 month follow-up. Lowest decrease of abdominal fat area after 12 months was seen for PPG. Gallstone incidence was significantly lower after PPG compared to TG (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: For EGC involving the upper third, PPG can be another good option with lower postoperative morbidity, better functional outcomes, and same oncological safety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early gastric cancer; Outcomes; Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy; Upper stomach

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30778800     DOI: 10.1007/s10120-018-00921-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  52 in total

1.  Nutritional assessment of patients after pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masahide Ikeguchi; Hirohiko Kuroda; Kyouichi Kihara; Tomoko Hatata; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Kenji Fukuda; Hiroaki Saito; Shigeru Tatebe
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy is better than laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for middle-third early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yun-Suhk Suh; Dong-Seok Han; Seong-Ho Kong; Sebastianus Kwon; Cheong-Il Shin; Woo-Ho Kim; Hyung-Ho Kim; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Intraoperative Gastroscopy for Tumor Localization in Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hoon Hur; Sang-Yong Son; Yong Kwan Cho; Sang-Uk Han
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Clinical outcomes of intraoperative manual dilatation of pylorus in pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Chun-Chao Zhu; Tae-Han Kim; Felix Berlth; Shin-Hoo Park; Yun-Suhk Suh; Seong-Ho Kong; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Hui Cao; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Feasibility and nutritional impact of laparoscopy-assisted subtotal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper stomach.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Kosuga; Naoki Hiki; Souya Nunobe; Hisashi Noma; Michitaka Honda; Shinya Tanimura; Takeshi Sano; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Diminished Gastric Resection Preserves Better Quality of Life in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Isozaki; Sasau Matsumoto; Shigeki Murakami; Takehiro Takama; Tatsuo Sho; Kiyohiro Ishihara; Kunihiko Sakai; Masanori Takeda; Koji Nakada; Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
Journal:  Acta Med Okayama       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.892

7.  Pyloric motility after pylorus-preserving gastrectomy with or without the pyloric branch of the vagus nerve.

Authors:  Toshihiro Nakabayashi; Erito Mochiki; Moises Garcia; Norihiro Haga; Tomoaki Suzuki; Takayuki Asao; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Association between single-slice measurements of visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue with volumetric measurements: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  T Irlbeck; J M Massaro; F Bamberg; C J O'Donnell; U Hoffmann; C S Fox
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  Laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: preservation of vagus nerve and infrapyloric blood flow induces less stasis.

Authors:  Souya Nunobe; Naoki Hiki; Tetsu Fukunaga; Masanori Tokunaga; Shigekazu Ohyama; Yasuyuki Seto; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography.

Authors:  Fernando Marum Mauad; Francisco Abaeté Chagas-Neto; Augusto César Garcia Saab Benedeti; Marcello Henrique Nogueira-Barbosa; Valdair Francisco Muglia; Antonio Adilton Oliveira Carneiro; Enrico Mattana Muller; Jorge Elias Junior
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2017 May-Jun
View more
  7 in total

1.  Prediction Model for Screening Patients at Risk of Malnutrition After Gastric Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Ji-Hyeon Park; Eunjung Kim; Eun-Mi Seol; Seong-Ho Kong; Do Joong Park; Han-Kwang Yang; Jong-Ho Choi; Shin-Hoo Park; Hwi-Nyeong Choe; Meera Kweon; Jiwon Park; Yunhee Choi; Hyuk-Joon Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Proximal Anterior-Antrum Posterior (PAAP) Overlapping Anastomosis in Minimally Invasive Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer Located in the High Body and Posterior Wall of the Stomach.

Authors:  Ji-Hyeon Park; Seong-Ho Kong; Jong-Ho Choi; Shin-Hoo Park; Yun-Suhk Suh; Do-Joong Park; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.720

3.  Short-term Outcomes of Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer: Comparison Between Extracorporeal and Intracorporeal Gastrogastrostomy.

Authors:  Khalid Alzahrani; Ji-Hyeon Park; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Shin-Hoo Park; Jong-Ho Choi; Chaojie Wang; Fadhel Alzahrani; Yun-Suhk Suh; Seong-Ho Kong; Do Joong Park; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 3.197

4.  A comparison between pylorus-preserving and distal gastrectomy in surgical safety and functional benefit with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinyu Mao; Xinlei Xu; Hua Zhu; Chunpeng Ji; Xu Lu; Baolin Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Signature and Prediction of Perigastric Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Gastric Cancer and Total Gastrectomy: Is Total Gastrectomy Always Necessary?

Authors:  Chun-Dong Zhang; Hiroharu Yamashita; Yasuhiro Okumura; Koichi Yagi; Susumu Aikou; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Risks and benefits of additional surgery for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach meeting non-curative resection criteria after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Sin Hye Park; Hong Man Yoon; Keun Won Ryu; Young-Woo Kim; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Bang Wool Eom
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.253

7.  Pathological and oncological outcomes of pylorus-preserving versus conventional distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sen Hou; Fan Liu; Zhidong Gao; Yingjiang Ye
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.253

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.