Literature DB >> 21358489

T1ρ magnetic resonance imaging and discography pressure as novel biomarkers for disc degeneration and low back pain.

Arijitt Borthakur1, Philip M Maurer, Matthew Fenty, Chenyang Wang, Rachelle Berger, Jonathon Yoder, Richard A Balderston, Dawn M Elliott.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of patients low back pain (LBP) requiring discography as part of their routine clinical diagnoses and asymptomatic age-matched volunteers.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether T1ρ MRI and discography opening pressure (OP) are quantitative biomarkers of disc degeneration in LBP patients and in asymptomatic volunteers. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Disc degenerative disease, a common cause of LBP, is related to the patient's prognosis and serves as a target for therapeutic interventions. However, there are few quantitative measures in the clinical setting. Discography OP and T1ρ MRI are potential biomarkers of disc degenerative disease related to biochemical composition of the intervertebral disc.
METHODS: The institutional review board approved all experiments, and informed consent was provided by each subject. Patients being treated for LBP (n = 17; 68 levels; mean age, 44 ± 6 years; and range, 30-53) and control subjects (n = 11; 44 levels; mean age, 43 ± 17 years; and range, 22-76) underwent T1ρ and T2 MRI on a Siemens 3T Tim Trio clinical scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA). The LBP patients also received multilevel provocative discography before their MRI. OP was recorded as the pressure when fluid first enters the nucleus of the intervertebral disc.
RESULTS: T1ρ was significantly lower in the painful discs (55.3 ± 3.0 ms, mean ± SE) from control (92.0 ± 4.9 ms, P < 0.001) and nonpainful discs (83.6 ± 3.2 ms, P < 0.001). Mean OP for the painful discs (11.8 ± 1.0 psi, mean ± SE) was significantly lower than that for nonpainful discs (19.1 ± 0.7 psi, P < 0.001). Both T1ρ and OP correlated moderately with Pfirrmann degenerative grade. Receiver-operating-characteristic area under the curve was 0.91 for T1ρ MRI and 0.84 for OP for predicting painful discs.
CONCLUSION: T1ρ and OP are quantitative measures of degeneration that are consistent across both control subjects and LBP patients. A significant and strong correlation exists between T1ρ values and in vivo OP measurements obtained by discography in LBP patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21358489      PMCID: PMC4002043          DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820287bf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  36 in total

1.  Proteoglycan depletion-induced changes in transverse relaxation maps of cartilage: comparison of T2 and T1rho.

Authors:  Ravinder Reddy Regatte; Sarma V S Akella; Arijitt Borthakur; J Bruce Kneeland; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Investigation of the laminate structure of lumbar disc anulus fibrosus.

Authors:  F Marchand; A M Ahmed
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Swelling pressure of the lumbar intervertebral discs: influence of age, spinal level, composition, and degeneration.

Authors:  J P Urban; J F McMullin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Degeneration and the chemical composition of the human lumbar intervertebral disc.

Authors:  R H Pearce; B J Grimmer; M E Adams
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  An experimental study comparing percutaneous discectomy with chemonucleolysis.

Authors:  R Gunzburg; R D Fraser; R Moore; B Vernon-Roberts
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  C W Pfirrmann; A Metzdorf; M Zanetti; J Hodler; N Boos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis.

Authors:  W H Kirkaldy-Willis; J H Wedge; K Yong-Hing; J Reilly
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Material properties in unconfined compression of human nucleus pulposus, injectable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels and tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Neil R Malhotra; Lihui Weng; Weiliam Chen; Robert L Mauck; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain.

Authors:  Eugene J Carragee; Matthew Hannibal
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Sodium magnetic resonance imaging of proteoglycan depletion in an in vivo model of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Andrew J Wheaton; Arijitt Borthakur; George R Dodge; J Bruce Kneeland; H Ralph Schumacher; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  33 in total

1.  T1ρ magnetic resonance imaging quantification of early lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Bruno Beomonte Zobel; Gianluca Vadalà; Riccardo Del Vescovo; Sofia Battisti; Francesca Maria Martina; Luigi Stellato; Emanuele Leoncini; Arijitt Borthakur; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Advances in the diagnosis of degenerated lumbar discs and their possible clinical application.

Authors:  Marco Brayda-Bruno; Marta Tibiletti; Keita Ito; Jeremy Fairbank; Fabio Galbusera; Alberto Zerbi; Sally Roberts; Ellen Wachtel; Yulia Merkher; Sarit Sara Sivan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  T1ρ and T2 mapping of the intervertebral disk: comparison of different methods of segmentation.

Authors:  R Menezes-Reis; C E G Salmon; C S Carvalho; G P Bonugli; C B Chung; M H Nogueira-Barbosa
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Dosik Hwang; Sewon Kim; Nirusha A Abeydeera; Sheronda Statum; Koichi Masuda; Christine B Chung; Palanan Siriwanarangsun; Won C Bae
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

5.  Comparison between pain at discography and morphological disc changes at axial loaded MRI in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Hanna Hebelka; Helena Brisby; Tommy Hansson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Mesenchymal stem cell tracking in the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Charles Handley; Tony Goldschlager; David Oehme; Peter Ghosh; Graham Jenkin
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Is bone density associated with intervertebral disc pressure in healthy and degenerated discs?

Authors:  Paul M Fein; Alexander DelMonaco; Timothy M Jackman; Cameron Curtiss; Ali Guermazi; Glenn D Barest; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  RNA Sequencing Reveals a Role of TonEBP Transcription Factor in Regulation of Pro-inflammatory Genes in Response to Hyperosmolarity in Healthy Nucleus Pulposus Cells: A HOMEOSTATIC RESPONSE?

Authors:  Zariel I Johnson; Irving M Shapiro; Makarand V Risbud
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Lumbar intervertebral discs T2 relaxometry and T1ρ relaxometry correlation with age in asymptomatic young adults.

Authors:  Rafael Menezes-Reis; Carlos E Garrido Salmon; Gustavo P Bonugli; Debora Mazoroski; Mauricio H Tamashiro; Leonor G Savarese; Marcello Henrique Nogueira-Barbosa
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-08

Review 10.  Cell therapy for intervertebral disc repair: advancing cell therapy from bench to clinics.

Authors:  L M Benneker; G Andersson; J C Iatridis; D Sakai; R Härtl; K Ito; S Grad
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.