Literature DB >> 15062713

Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain.

Eugene J Carragee1, Matthew Hannibal.   

Abstract

The diagnostic evaluation of chronic LBP is at best a complex and involved undertaking. The most important part of the process lies in the knowledge of the patient and a solid history and physical examination. From there, most of the serious and life-threatening causes of LBP can be elucidated and studies may be used for confirmation. Imaging studies are used most practically as confirmation studies once a working diagnosis is determined. MRI, although excellent at defining tumor, infection, and nerve compression, can be too sensitive with regard to degenerative disease findings and commonly displays pathology that is not responsible for the patient's symptoms. As an example, the high-intensity zones (HIZ) seen on MRI are reliable in determining annular defects in the disc but are not reliable in establishing internal disc disruption as the cause of LBP. Discography is the primary tool used by many physicians to determine the true pain generator when discogenic LBP is suspected. Because the reliability of the patient response is fundamental to discography, interpreting the test in different settings must be considered. In individuals with disc degeneration and annular defects, discography may elicit LBP with injection whether the patient is symptomatic with serious LBP or not. The pain response may be amplified in those subjects with issues of chronic pain, social stressors, such as secondary gain or litigation claims, or psychologic distress disorder. These factors have been shown experimentally to be associated with an increased risk for a false positive injection. The ability of an individual to differentiate the true site of LBP by the quality of sensation with disc injection (concordancy) of pain produced by the injected disc also may not be reliable. In fact, individuals may not have the neural discrimination to differentiate sclerotomal pain originating from different sites in the low back and pelvis. One may realize that chronic LBP illness may not stem from a mechanical spinal disorder alone. In fact, the mechanical pathology may be just a portion of the problem with amplification by neurophysiologic, social, and psychologic issues. Chronic disabling LBP commonly is confounded by chronic pain, emotional troubles, poor job satisfaction, alcohol and narcotic abuse, and compensation issues, just to identify a few. It would follow that expecting to identify a single cause for this symptom complex is impractical and any single test may not be a reasonable approach. Furthermore, surgical correction of the mechanical portion of chronic LBP. even if correctly identified, then can be expected only to relieve a portion of a patient's symptoms as long as the confounding issues continue to be significant or have become life long adaptive mechanisms. In the end, the discogram and other diagnostic tests are tools that have clear limitations. In this field, clinical judgment begins and ends with an understanding of a patient's life and circumstances as much as with their specific spinal pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15062713     DOI: 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00099-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  25 in total

1.  General practitioners' views on radiology reports of plain radiography for back pain.

Authors:  Ansgar Espeland; Anders Baerheim
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Ordering diagnostic imaging: a survey of ontario physiotherapists' opinions on an expanded scope of practice.

Authors:  Jodie Ng Fuk Chong; Krista De Luca; Sana Goldan; Abdullah Imam; Boris Li; Karl Zabjek; Anna Chu; Euson Yeung
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  [Correlation of degenerative intervertebral disk displacement using MRI with discography findings in patients with back pain].

Authors:  B Böhm; H Meinig; A Eckardt; S Schadmand-Fischer; J Heine
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: who should be fused? An updated review.

Authors:  Farzad Omidi-Kashani; Ebrahim Ghayem Hasankhani; Amir Ashjazadeh
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-08-19

5.  T1ρ magnetic resonance imaging and discography pressure as novel biomarkers for disc degeneration and low back pain.

Authors:  Arijitt Borthakur; Philip M Maurer; Matthew Fenty; Chenyang Wang; Rachelle Berger; Jonathon Yoder; Richard A Balderston; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Ondansetron Does Not Reduce Withdrawal in Patients With Physical Dependence on Chronic Opioid Therapy.

Authors:  Larry F Chu; John Sun; Anna Clemenson; Matthew J Erlendson; Tom Rico; Erika Cornell; Hannah Obasi; Zahra N Sayyid; Ellen M Encisco; Jeff Yu; Jamison G Gamble; Ian Carroll; J David Clark
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.702

7.  Potential triaging of referrals for lumbar spinal surgery consultation: a comparison of referral accuracy from pain specialists, findings from advanced imaging and a 3-item questionnaire.

Authors:  David Simon; Matt Coyle; Simon Dagenais; Joseph O'Neil; Eugene K Wai
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 8.  [Concepts of in-patient gradual diagnostics for patients with lumbar back-pain].

Authors:  R Kayser; K Mahlfeld; C E Heyde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Does the high-intensity zone (HIZ) of lumbar Intervertebral discs always represent an annular fissure?

Authors:  Zhi Shan; Huanhuan Chen; Junhui Liu; Hong Ren; Xuyang Zhang; Fengdong Zhao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  What is mechanical back pain and how best to treat it?

Authors:  James J Chien; Zahid H Bajwa
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.