Literature DB >> 21356139

Why liquid energy results in overconsumption.

Cees de Graaf1.   

Abstract

Liquids have been shown to have a low satiating efficiency. The may be related to the high rate of consumption for liquids which may be higher than 200 g/min. In a number of studies, we showed that the positive relationship between eating rate and energy intake is mediated by oro-sensory exposure time. Longer sensory exposure times are consistently associated with lower food intakes. This observation maybe linked to the role of cephalic phase responses to foods. Cephalic phase responses are a set of physiological responses, which are conceived to prepare the digestive system for the incoming flow of nutrients after ingestion, with the aim of maintaining homeostasis. Results from various studies suggest that cephalic phase responses are much smaller (absent) for liquids compared to solids. It is hypothesised that the absence of cephalic phase responses to liquid foods may be one of the causes why liquid energies enter the body undetected and lead to weak energy intake compensation. This idea fits with the concept of the taste system as a nutrient-sensing system that informs the brain and the gastro-intestinal system about what is coming into our body. With liquids, this system is bypassed. Slower eating may help the human body to associate the sensory signals from food with their metabolic consequences. Foods that are eaten quickly may impair this association, and may therefore lead to overconsumption of energy, and ultimately to weight gain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21356139     DOI: 10.1017/S0029665111000012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc        ISSN: 0029-6651            Impact factor:   6.297


  29 in total

1.  Effects of learning and food form on energy intake and appetitive responses.

Authors:  Joshua B Jones; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-06-21

2.  Short-term effects of a green coffee extract-, Garcinia c ambogia- and L-carnitine-containing chewing gum on snack intake and appetite regulation.

Authors:  Cecilia Bobillo; Graham Finlayson; Ana Martínez; Daniela Fischman; Analisa Beneitez; Alejandro J Ferrero; Belisario E Fernández; Marcos A Mayer
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  Faster eating rates are associated with higher energy intakes during an ad libitum meal, higher BMI and greater adiposity among 4·5-year-old children: results from the Growing Up in Singapore Towards Healthy Outcomes (GUSTO) cohort.

Authors:  Anna Fogel; Ai Ting Goh; Lisa R Fries; Suresh A Sadananthan; S Sendhil Velan; Navin Michael; Mya-Thway Tint; Marielle V Fortier; Mei Jun Chan; Jia Ying Toh; Yap-Seng Chong; Kok Hian Tan; Fabian Yap; Lynette P Shek; Michael J Meaney; Birit F P Broekman; Yung Seng Lee; Keith M Godfrey; Mary F F Chong; Ciarán G Forde
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.718

4.  Tolerable upper intake level for dietary sugars.

Authors:  Dominique Turck; Torsten Bohn; Jacqueline Castenmiller; Stefaan de Henauw; Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst; Helle Katrine Knutsen; Alexander Maciuk; Inge Mangelsdorf; Harry J McArdle; Androniki Naska; Carmen Peláez; Kristina Pentieva; Alfonso Siani; Frank Thies; Sophia Tsabouri; Roger Adan; Pauline Emmett; Carlo Galli; Mathilde Kersting; Paula Moynihan; Luc Tappy; Laura Ciccolallo; Agnès de Sesmaisons-Lecarré; Lucia Fabiani; Zsuzsanna Horvath; Laura Martino; Irene Muñoz Guajardo; Silvia Valtueña Martínez; Marco Vinceti
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-02-28

5.  Valuing the Diversity of Research Methods to Advance Nutrition Science.

Authors:  Richard D Mattes; Sylvia B Rowe; Sarah D Ohlhorst; Andrew W Brown; Daniel J Hoffman; DeAnn J Liska; Edith J M Feskens; Jaapna Dhillon; Katherine L Tucker; Leonard H Epstein; Lynnette M Neufeld; Michael Kelley; Naomi K Fukagawa; Roger A Sunde; Steven H Zeisel; Anthony J Basile; Laura E Borth; Emahlea Jackson
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 11.567

Review 6.  Dietary Management of Obesity: Cornerstones of Healthy Eating Patterns.

Authors:  Alissa D Smethers; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.456

7.  A rapid beverage intake questionnaire can detect changes in beverage intake.

Authors:  Valisa E Hedrick; Dana L Comber; Katherine E Ferguson; Paul A Estabrooks; Jyoti Savla; Andrea M Dietrich; Elena Serrano; Brenda M Davy
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2012-10-31

8.  Beyond expectations: the physiological basis of sensory enhancement of satiety.

Authors:  M R Yeomans; R Re; M Wickham; H Lundholm; L Chambers
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  Effects of fruit and vegetable, consumed in solid vs beverage forms, on acute and chronic appetitive responses in lean and obese adults.

Authors:  J A Houchins; S-Y Tan; W W Campbell; R D Mattes
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  Energy-dense snacks can have the same expected satiation as sugar-containing beverages.

Authors:  Ashley A Martin; Liam R Hamill; Sarah Davies; Peter J Rogers; Jeffrey M Brunstrom
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.