Literature DB >> 21354055

SNaPshot and StripAssay as valuable alternatives to direct sequencing for KRAS mutation detection in colon cancer routine diagnostics.

Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta1, Elna Moerland, Hanneke de Bruyne, Henk de Graaf, Tamara Vrancken, Gesina van Lijnschoten, Adriaan J C van den Brule.   

Abstract

Although direct sequencing is the gold standard for KRAS mutation detection in routine diagnostics, it remains laborious, time consuming, and not very sensitive. Our objective was to evaluate SNaPshot and the KRAS StripAssay as alternatives to sequencing for KRAS mutation detection in daily practice. KRAS exon 2-specific PCR followed by sequencing or by a SNaPshot reaction was performed. For the StripAssay, a mutant-enriched PCR was followed by hybridization to KRAS-specific probes bound to a nitrocellulose strip. To test sensitivities, dilution series of mutated DNA in wild-type DNA were made. Additionally, direct sequencing and SNaPshot were evaluated in 296 colon cancer samples. Detection limits of direct sequencing, SNaPshot, and StripAssay were 20%, 10%, and 1% tumor cells, respectively. Direct sequencing and SNaPshot can detect all 12 mutations in KRAS codons 12 and 13, whereas the StripAssay detects 10 of the most frequent ones. Workload and time to results are comparable for SNaPshot and direct sequencing. SNaPshot is flexible and easy to multiplex. The StripAssay is less time consuming for daily laboratory practice. SNaPshot is more flexible and slightly more sensitive than direct sequencing. The clinical evaluation showed comparable performances between direct sequencing and SNaPshot. The StripAssay is rapid and an extremely sensitive assay that could be considered when few tumor cells are available. However, found mutants should be confirmed to avoid risk of false positives.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21354055      PMCID: PMC3128574          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2010.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  19 in total

1.  Diagnostic biochip array for fast and sensitive detection of K-ras mutations in stool.

Authors:  Lothar Prix; Peter Uciechowski; Beatrix Böckmann; Michael Giesing; Andreas J Schuetz
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Single-tube reaction using peptide nucleic acid as both PCR clamp and sensor probe for the detection of rare mutations.

Authors:  Chiuan-Chian Chiou; Ji-Dung Luo; Tai-Long Chen
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 3.  KRAS mutation testing for predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy for colorectal carcinoma: proposal for an European quality assurance program.

Authors:  J H J M van Krieken; A Jung; T Kirchner; F Carneiro; R Seruca; F T Bosman; P Quirke; J F Fléjou; T Plato Hansen; G de Hertogh; P Jares; C Langner; G Hoefler; M Ligtenberg; D Tiniakos; S Tejpar; G Bevilacqua; A Ensari
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Sensitive sequencing method for KRAS mutation detection by Pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Takako Kawasaki; Mohan Brahmandam; Liying Yan; Mami Cantor; Chungdak Namgyal; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Gregory Y Lauwers; Massimo Loda; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  EGFR and KRAS mutations as criteria for treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: retro- and prospective observations in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  N van Zandwijk; A Mathy; L Boerrigter; H Ruijter; I Tielen; D de Jong; P Baas; S Burgers; P Nederlof
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Simple and sensitive detection of mutations in the ras proto-oncogenes using PNA-mediated PCR clamping.

Authors:  C Thiede; E Bayerdörffer; R Blasczyk; B Wittig; A Neubauer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A rapid, sensitive, reproducible and cost-effective method for mutation profiling of colon cancer and metastatic lymph nodes.

Authors:  Debora Fumagalli; Patrick G Gavin; Yusuke Taniyama; Seung-Il Kim; Hyun-Joo Choi; Soonmyung Paik; Katherine L Pogue-Geile
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Christos S Karapetis; Shirin Khambata-Ford; Derek J Jonker; Chris J O'Callaghan; Dongsheng Tu; Niall C Tebbutt; R John Simes; Haji Chalchal; Jeremy D Shapiro; Sonia Robitaille; Timothy J Price; Lois Shepherd; Heather-Jane Au; Christiane Langer; Malcolm J Moore; John R Zalcberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  High-fidelity DNA polymerase enhances the sensitivity of a peptide nucleic acid clamp PCR assay for K-ras mutations.

Authors:  Bjørnar Gilje; Reino Heikkilä; Satu Oltedal; Kjersti Tjensvoll; Oddmund Nordgård
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  Clinical relevance of KRAS mutation detection in metastatic colorectal cancer treated by Cetuximab plus chemotherapy.

Authors:  F Di Fiore; F Blanchard; F Charbonnier; F Le Pessot; A Lamy; M P Galais; L Bastit; A Killian; R Sesboüé; J J Tuech; A M Queuniet; B Paillot; J C Sabourin; F Michot; P Michel; T Frebourg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Current companion diagnostics in advanced colorectal cancer; getting a bigger and better piece of the pie.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Scott Kopetz; Kanwal P S Raghav
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

2.  A Sensitive Peptide Nucleic Acid Probe Assay for Detection of BRAF V600 Mutations in Melanoma.

Authors:  Tai-Long Chen; John Wen-Cheng Chang; Jia-Juan Hsieh; Hsin-Yi Cheng; Chiuan-Chian Chiou
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2016 09-10       Impact factor: 4.069

3.  A Multicenter, Open-Label Phase II Clinical Trial of Combined MEK plus EGFR Inhibition for Chemotherapy-Refractory Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew H Ko; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Jessica Van Ziffle; Olga M Mirzoeva; Nancy M Joseph; AmirAli Talasaz; Peter Kuhn; Margaret A Tempero; Eric A Collisson; R Kate Kelley; Alan P Venook; Elizabeth Dito; Anna Ong; Sharvina Ziyeh; Ryan Courtin; Regina Linetskaya; Sanaa Tahiri; W Michael Korn
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  KRAS Testing: A Tool for the Implementation of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Rodney E Shackelford; Nicholas A Whitling; Patricia McNab; Shanker Japa; Domenico Coppola
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2012-07

5.  Biochip-based detection of KRAS mutation in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Gernot Kriegshäuser; Gerhild Fabjani; Barbara Ziegler; Sabine Zöchbauer-Müller; Adelheid End; Robert Zeillinger
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Shifted termination assay (STA) fragment analysis to detect BRAF V600 mutations in papillary thyroid carcinomas.

Authors:  So Young Kang; Soomin Ahn; Sun-Mi Lee; Ji Yun Jeong; Ji-Youn Sung; Young Lyun Oh; Kyoung-Mee Kim
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  Development and validation of a clinical trial patient stratification assay that interrogates 27 mutation sites in MAPK pathway genes.

Authors:  Ken C N Chang; Stefan Galuska; Russell Weiner; Matthew J Marton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Detection of low-abundance KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer using microfluidic capillary electrophoresis-based restriction fragment length polymorphism method with optimized assay conditions.

Authors:  Huidan Zhang; Jin Song; Hui Ren; Zhangrun Xu; Xiaonan Wang; Lianfeng Shan; Jin Fang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Detection of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF by mass spectrometry - a sensitive, reliable, fast and cost-effective technique.

Authors:  Mark Kriegsmann; Norbert Arens; Volker Endris; Wilko Weichert; Jörg Kriegsmann
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.644

10.  Comparison of next generation sequencing, SNaPshot assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for lung adenocarcinoma EGFR mutation assessment.

Authors:  Andrei-Tudor Cernomaz; Ina Iuliana Macovei; Ionut Pavel; Carmen Grigoriu; Mihai Marinca; Florent Baty; Simona Peter; Radu Zonda; Martin Brutsche; Bogdan- Dragos Grigoriu
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.