Literature DB >> 21351877

Inclusion, analysis, and reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in clinical trials: have we made progress?

Stacie E Geller1, Abby Koch, Beth Pellettieri, Molly Carnes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Revitalization Act of 1993 requires that NIH-funded clinical trials include women and minorities as participants; other federal agencies have adopted similar guidelines. The objective of this study is to determine the current level of compliance with these guidelines for the inclusion, analysis, and reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in federally funded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to compare the current level of compliance with that from 2004, which was reported previously.
METHODS: RCTs published in nine prominent medical journals in 2009 were identified by PubMed search. Studies where individuals were not the unit of analysis, those begun before 1994, and those not receiving federal funding were excluded. PubMed search located 512 published articles. After exclusion of ineligible articles, 86 (17%) remained for analysis.
RESULTS: Thirty studies were sex specific. The median enrollment of women in the 56 studies that included both men and women was 37%. Seventy-five percent of the studies did not report any outcomes by sex, including 9 studies reporting <20% women enrolled. Among all 86 studies, 21% did not report sample sizes by racial and ethnic groups, and 64% did not provide any analysis by racial or ethnic groups. Only 3 studies indicated that the generalizability of their results may be limited by lack of diversity among those studied. There were no statistically significant changes in inclusion or reporting of sex or race/ethnicity when compared with 2004.
CONCLUSIONS: Ensuring enhanced inclusion, analysis, and reporting of sex and race/ethnicity entails the efforts of NIH, journal editors, and the researchers themselves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21351877      PMCID: PMC3058895          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  15 in total

1.  Gender bias in clinical trials: do double standards still apply?

Authors:  K Ramasubbu; H Gurm; D Litaker
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2001-10

Review 2.  Adequacy of reporting race/ethnicity in clinical trials in areas of health disparities.

Authors:  Giselle Corbie-Smith; Diane Marie M St George; Sandra Moody-Ayers; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Wanted. Single, white male for medical research.

Authors:  R Dresser
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schulz; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Sex bias in trials and treatment must end.

Authors:  Alison M Kim; Candace M Tingen; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Low rate of sex-specific result reporting in cardiovascular trials.

Authors:  Lori A Blauwet; Sharonne N Hayes; David McManus; Rita F Redberg; Mary Norine Walsh
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Females in clinical studies: where are we going?

Authors:  K Uhl; A Parekh; S Kweder
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 8.  Adherence to federal guidelines for reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in clinical trials.

Authors:  Stacie E Geller; Marci Goldstein Adams; Molly Carnes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Women subjects in NIH-funded clinical research literature: lack of progress in both representation and analysis by sex.

Authors:  R M Vidaver; B Lafleur; C Tong; R Bradshaw; S A Marts
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2000-06

10.  Sex and gender bias in anatomy and physical diagnosis text illustrations.

Authors:  K D Mendelsohn; L Z Nieman; K Isaacs; S Lee; S P Levison
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-10-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  86 in total

1.  Attributes of researchers and their strategies to recruit minority populations: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Sandra Crouse Quinn; James Butler; Craig S Fryer; Mary A Garza; Kevin H Kim; Christopher Ryan; Stephen B Thomas
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Editor's spotlight/take 5: sex-specific analysis of data in high-impact orthopaedic journals: how are we doing?

Authors:  Jo A Hannafin; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Sex/gender differences in cardiovascular disease prevention: what a difference a decade makes.

Authors:  Lori Mosca; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Nanette Kass Wenger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Maximizing Effectiveness Trials in PTSD and SUD Through Secondary Analysis: Benefits and Limitations Using the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network "Women and Trauma" Study as a Case Example.

Authors:  Denise A Hien; Aimee N C Campbell; Lesia M Ruglass; Lissette Saavedra; Abigail G Mathews; Grace Kiriakos; Antonio Morgan-Lopez
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2015-04-07

5.  Is religiosity related to attitudes toward clinical trials participation?

Authors:  Svetlana Daverio-Zanetti; Kathryn Schultz; Miguel A Martin del Campo; Vanessa Malcarne; Natasha Riley; Georgia Robins Sadler
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  Sex bias and omission in neuroscience research is influenced by research model and journal, but not reported NIH funding.

Authors:  Gabriella M Mamlouk; David M Dorris; Lily R Barrett; John Meitzen
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 8.606

7.  Intrinsic excitability varies by sex in prepubertal striatal medium spiny neurons.

Authors:  David M Dorris; Jinyan Cao; Jaime A Willett; Caitlin A Hauser; John Meitzen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Sex-specific analysis of data in high-impact orthopaedic journals: how are we doing?

Authors:  Carolyn M Hettrich; Sommer Hammoud; Lauren E LaMont; Elizabeth A Arendt; Jo A Hannafin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Sex bias in rhinology research.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Stephenson; Zainab Farzal; Adam M Zanation; Brent A Senior
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.858

10.  Advancing Women's Health and Women's Leadership With Endowed Chairs in Women's Health.

Authors:  Molly Carnes; Paula Johnson; Wendy Klein; Marjorie Jenkins; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.