Literature DB >> 17199453

Adherence to federal guidelines for reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in clinical trials.

Stacie E Geller1, Marci Goldstein Adams, Molly Carnes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act of 1993 requires that NIH-funded clinical trials include women and minorities as subjects; other federal agencies have adopted similar guidelines. The objective of this study was to determine the current level of compliance with these guidelines in federally funded randomized controlled trials.
METHODS: Randomized controlled trials published in nine influential medical journals in 2004 were identified by PubMed search. Studies where individuals were not the unit of analysis, those begun before 1994, and those not receiving federal funding were excluded. Included studies were examined to determine sample characteristics and presence of subgroup reporting.
RESULTS: PubMed located 589 published papers. After exclusion of ineligible papers, 69 remained for analysis. Among 46 clinical studies enrolling both men and women, women were generally underrepresented, comprising on average 37% of the sample and only 24% of the sample when analysis was restricted to drug trials. Eighty-seven percent of the studies did not report any outcomes by sex or include sex as a covariate in modeling. Among all 69 studies, 18% did not break down sample sizes by racial and ethnic groups, and 87% did not provide any analysis by racial or ethnic groups. Only 5 studies indicated that the generalizability of their results may be limited by lack of diversity among those studied.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate inadequate compliance with the NIH guidelines. Researchers, editors, and journal audiences share the responsibility of ensuring compliance with our country's policies regarding federally funded research to effect healthcare improvements for all.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17199453     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.1123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  39 in total

1.  Sex bias in trials and treatment must end.

Authors:  Alison M Kim; Candace M Tingen; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Routinely collected data and comparative effectiveness evidence: promises and limitations.

Authors:  Lars G Hemkens; Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Sex/gender differences in cardiovascular disease prevention: what a difference a decade makes.

Authors:  Lori Mosca; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Nanette Kass Wenger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Sex matters: gender disparities in quality and outcomes of care.

Authors:  Arlene S Bierman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  The inclusion of women and minorities in smoking cessation clinical trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel L Dickerson; Robert F Leeman; Carolyn M Mazure; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb

6.  Policies to address disparities in clinical trials: the EDICT Project.

Authors:  Cynthia A Spiker; Armin D Weinberg
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Women's health and women's leadership in academic medicine: hitting the same glass ceiling?

Authors:  Molly Carnes; Claudia Morrissey; Stacie E Geller
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Advancing Women's Health and Women's Leadership With Endowed Chairs in Women's Health.

Authors:  Molly Carnes; Paula Johnson; Wendy Klein; Marjorie Jenkins; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Beliefs of women's risk as research subjects: a four-city study examining differences by sex and by race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Stefanie L Russell; Ralph V Katz; Nancy R Kressin; B Lee Green; Min Qi Wang; Cristina Claudio; Krassimira Tzvetkova
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Analysis of sex and gender-specific research reveals a common increase in publications and marked differences between disciplines.

Authors:  Sabine Oertelt-Prigione; Roza Parol; Stephan Krohn; Robert Preissner; Vera Regitz-Zagrosek
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.