Literature DB >> 19579863

Changes in glucose metabolism during and after radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Giampiero Giovacchini1, Maria Picchio, Stefano Schipani, Claudio Landoni, Luigi Gianolli, Valentino Bettinardi, Nadia Di Muzio, Maria Carla Gilardi, Ferruccio Fazio, Cristina Messa.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the metabolic response to radiotherapy in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients is commonly performed about three months after the end of radiotherapy. The aim of the present study was to assess with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose changes in glucose metabolism during and after radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients. METHODS AND STUDY
DESIGN: In 6 patients, PET/CT scans with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose were performed before (PET0), during (PET1; at a median of 14 days before the end of radiotherapy) and after the end of radiotherapy (PET2 and PET3, at a median of 28 and 93 days, respectively). The metabolic response was scored according to visual and semiquantitative criteria.
RESULTS: Standardize maximum uptake at PET1 (7.9 +/- 4.8), PET2 (5.1 +/- 4.1) and PET3 (2.7 +/- 3.1) were all significantly (P < 0.05; ANOVA repeated measures) lower than at PET0 (16.1 +/- 10.1). Standardized maximum uptake at PET1 was significantly higher than at both PET2 and PET3. There were no significant differences in SUV(max) between PET2 and PET3. PET3 identified 4 complete and 2 partial metabolic responses, whereas PET1 identified 6 partial metabolic responses. Radiotherapy-induced increased [l8F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake could be visually distinguished from tumor uptake based on PET/CT integration and was less frequent at PET1 (n = 2) than at PET3 (n = 6).
CONCLUSION: In non-small cell lung cancer, radiotherapy induces a progressive decrease in glucose metabolism that is greater 3 months after the end of treatment but can be detected during the treatment itself. Glucose avid, radiotherapy-induced inflammation is more evident after the end of radiotherapy than during radiotherapy and does not preclude the interpretation of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose images, particularly when using PET/CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19579863     DOI: 10.1177/030089160909500208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumori        ISSN: 0300-8916


  10 in total

1.  A radiobiological model of radiotherapy response and its correlation with prognostic imaging variables.

Authors:  Mireia Crispin-Ortuzar; Jeho Jeong; Andrew N Fontanella; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Cigarette smoke induces MUC5AC protein expression through the activation of Sp1.

Authors:  Y Peter Di; Jinming Zhao; Richart Harper
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Early FDG PET at 10 or 20 Gy under chemoradiotherapy is prognostic for locoregional control and overall survival in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Maria Hentschel; Steffen Appold; Andreas Schreiber; Nasreddin Abolmaali; Andrij Abramyuk; Wolfgang Dörr; Joerg Kotzerke; Michael Baumann; Klaus Zöphel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Role of interim 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the early prediction of clinical outcomes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) during radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy. A systematic review.

Authors:  Marta Cremonesi; Laura Gilardi; Mahila Esmeralda Ferrari; Gaia Piperno; Laura Lavinia Travaini; Robert Timmerman; Francesca Botta; Guido Baroni; Chiara Maria Grana; Sara Ronchi; Delia Ciardo; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Cristina Garibaldi; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 9.236

5.   ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT during chemo-radiotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: the early metabolic response correlates with the delivered radiation dose.

Authors:  Mariangela Massaccesi; Maria Lucia Calcagni; Maria Grazia Spitilli; Fabrizio Cocciolillo; Francesca Pelligrò; Lorenzo Bonomo; Vincenzo Valentini; Alessandro Giordano
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Four-dimensional (4D) motion detection to correct respiratory effects in treatment response assessment using molecular imaging biomarkers.

Authors:  Eduard Schreibmann; Ian Crocker; David M Schuster; Walter J Curran; Tim Fox
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-08-31

7.  Low dose irradiation profoundly affects transcriptome and microRNAme in rat mammary gland tissues.

Authors:  Lidia Luzhna; Olga Kovalchuk
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2014-11-10

8.  Alterations of MicroRNA Expression in the Liver, Heart, and Testis of Mice Upon Exposure to Repeated Low-Dose Radiation.

Authors:  Xinyue Liang; Shirong Zheng; Jiuwei Cui; Dehai Yu; Guozi Yang; Lei Zhou; Brain Wang; Lu Cai; Wei Li
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Modelling non-homogeneous stochastic reaction-diffusion systems: the case study of gemcitabine-treated non-small cell lung cancer growth.

Authors:  Paola Lecca; Daniele Morpurgo
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  MeDiA: Mean Distance Association and Its Applications in Nonlinear Gene Set Analysis.

Authors:  Hesen Peng; Junjie Ma; Yun Bai; Jianwei Lu; Tianwei Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.